How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:25:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?

They might talk about Trump a bit more without the fear of getting stepped on
immediately.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On 1/28/2016 5:39 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:25:26 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?

They might talk about Trump a bit more without the fear of getting stepped on
immediately.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Rest assured. He'll have a snappy critique ready the following day.

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:43:52 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

We are very familiar with one who says very little beyond name-calling and insults.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On 1/28/2016 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:43:52 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

We are very familiar with one who says very little beyond name-calling and insults.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

I wonder why he doesn't run for office in bumfoch MD.

On 1/28/16 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:43:52 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/27/16 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 20:19:26 -0500, Alex wrote:

Boating All Out wrote:
How many from the Republican clown car will try to get in
on it, instead of mouthing inanities in a Fox debate.



Now you are using Harryism's, Kevin? I thought you were a bit smarter
than that.

I suppose the real question is how bad ratings will be on Fox without
Trump. That is the only thing Rupert really cares about. I suppose the
core audience will be watching but they would watch a test pattern if
that was what was on.
I haven't really watched any of the debates so it doesn't affect me
either way. Is anyone actually going to say anything we have not heard
already?


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

We are very familiar with one who says very little beyond name-calling and insults.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

You plan on publishing your Bio of Racism and Hate, JohnnyMop?

On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 06:43:52 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Early on, Kasich sounded as if he had an idea or two but that pretty
much stopped in the later "debates."I watched one more after that, but
now I just watch a few highlights or, in fact, lowlights. Very little
beyond name-calling and insults.

I haven't seen a real "debate" since the early 90s and the candidates
made sure that would never happen again. These things are just Q&A
sessions where the questions are all agreed to beforehand and they
still do not actually answer the questions most of the time. We just
hear snippets of their stump speech.
Since there are no 3d party candidates, all you will ever hear about
are the things the Remocrat/Depublican cabal wants you to hear about.
It will be a debate about guns, gays, abortion and, maybe, who voted
for the wars. Nobody has talked seriously about the debt since Perot
and they glaze over the economy with throw away lines about how they
will create jobs but nobody has actually explained how they pay for
them.