Spot On...
 

I am Irish. For many years in my native land the Rev. Ian Paisley
spouted bigoted hatred about Catholics in Northern Ireland, but then
claimed innocence when some militant sectarian group massacred
Catholics. Speech was not murder, he said. He would never condone
killing, he said. Then he went right back to feeding the attitudes that
spawned the killing. Few were fooled.

We should not be fooled in America today.

In this country the "mainstream" right-wing has made an industry of
demonizing African-Americans as "thugs" and criminals - just look at the
divergence in tone between the recent coverage of Ferguson or Baltimore
and the (mostly white) biker massacre in Waco, TX. For decades, white
America has been told that black Americans are lazy leeches, dependent
on hand-outs funded by your hard-earned taxes to bankroll their immoral
lifestyles.

The first black president was greeted by the right not only with diehard
obstructionism but a chorus of color-coded abuse ("lazy," "food-stamp
president" etc) and questions about his very American-ness: he was "not
one of us," a foreigner adhering to a foreign religion who has no right
to be president.

The siren song of racial hate relentlessly put out by the "mainstream"
right finds echo in the gunshots that rang out in Charleston.

Rightists will, of course, deny the connection, the way Paisley did. But
we are not fooled.

- - -

This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Spot On...
 

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I am Irish. For many years in my native land the Rev. Ian Paisley
spouted bigoted hatred about Catholics in Northern Ireland, but then
claimed innocence when some militant sectarian group massacred
Catholics. Speech was not murder, he said. He would never condone
killing, he said. Then he went right back to feeding the attitudes that
spawned the killing. Few were fooled.

We should not be fooled in America today.

In this country the "mainstream" right-wing has made an industry of
demonizing African-Americans as "thugs" and criminals - just look at the
divergence in tone between the recent coverage of Ferguson or Baltimore
and the (mostly white) biker massacre in Waco, TX. For decades, white
America has been told that black Americans are lazy leeches, dependent
on hand-outs funded by your hard-earned taxes to bankroll their immoral
lifestyles.

The first black president was greeted by the right not only with diehard
obstructionism but a chorus of color-coded abuse ("lazy," "food-stamp
president" etc) and questions about his very American-ness: he was "not
one of us," a foreigner adhering to a foreign religion who has no right
to be president.

The siren song of racial hate relentlessly put out by the "mainstream"
right finds echo in the gunshots that rang out in Charleston.

Rightists will, of course, deny the connection, the way Paisley did. But
we are not fooled.

- - -

This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

If you think there was no coverage of the Waco biker brawl you are
just not paying attention and 177 went to jail.
Most of the people killed in the "massacre" were shot by the police.
That is probably why the reason why there wasn't more coverage I
suppose, police shooting a white guy isn't news.

You don't read much about the ~300 murders a year in Baltimore unless
you read the Sun.

Spot On...
 

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

More of his Krausescheiße.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Spot On...
 

On 1/16/16 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I am Irish. For many years in my native land the Rev. Ian Paisley
spouted bigoted hatred about Catholics in Northern Ireland, but then
claimed innocence when some militant sectarian group massacred
Catholics. Speech was not murder, he said. He would never condone
killing, he said. Then he went right back to feeding the attitudes that
spawned the killing. Few were fooled.

We should not be fooled in America today.

In this country the "mainstream" right-wing has made an industry of
demonizing African-Americans as "thugs" and criminals - just look at the
divergence in tone between the recent coverage of Ferguson or Baltimore
and the (mostly white) biker massacre in Waco, TX. For decades, white
America has been told that black Americans are lazy leeches, dependent
on hand-outs funded by your hard-earned taxes to bankroll their immoral
lifestyles.

The first black president was greeted by the right not only with diehard
obstructionism but a chorus of color-coded abuse ("lazy," "food-stamp
president" etc) and questions about his very American-ness: he was "not
one of us," a foreigner adhering to a foreign religion who has no right
to be president.

The siren song of racial hate relentlessly put out by the "mainstream"
right finds echo in the gunshots that rang out in Charleston.

Rightists will, of course, deny the connection, the way Paisley did. But
we are not fooled.

- - -

This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

If you think there was no coverage of the Waco biker brawl you are
just not paying attention and 177 went to jail.
Most of the people killed in the "massacre" were shot by the police.
That is probably why the reason why there wasn't more coverage I
suppose, police shooting a white guy isn't news.

You don't read much about the ~300 murders a year in Baltimore unless
you read the Sun.


We are not fooled.

Spot On...
 

John H. wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

More of his Krausescheiße.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Thank you, Rev. Paisley.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Spot On...
 

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:04:09 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I am Irish. For many years in my native land the Rev. Ian Paisley
spouted bigoted hatred about Catholics in Northern Ireland, but then
claimed innocence when some militant sectarian group massacred
Catholics. Speech was not murder, he said. He would never condone
killing, he said. Then he went right back to feeding the attitudes that
spawned the killing. Few were fooled.

We should not be fooled in America today.

In this country the "mainstream" right-wing has made an industry of
demonizing African-Americans as "thugs" and criminals - just look at the
divergence in tone between the recent coverage of Ferguson or Baltimore
and the (mostly white) biker massacre in Waco, TX. For decades, white
America has been told that black Americans are lazy leeches, dependent
on hand-outs funded by your hard-earned taxes to bankroll their immoral
lifestyles.

The first black president was greeted by the right not only with diehard
obstructionism but a chorus of color-coded abuse ("lazy," "food-stamp
president" etc) and questions about his very American-ness: he was "not
one of us," a foreigner adhering to a foreign religion who has no right
to be president.

The siren song of racial hate relentlessly put out by the "mainstream"
right finds echo in the gunshots that rang out in Charleston.

Rightists will, of course, deny the connection, the way Paisley did. But
we are not fooled.

- - -

This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

If you think there was no coverage of the Waco biker brawl you are
just not paying attention and 177 went to jail.
Most of the people killed in the "massacre" were shot by the police.
That is probably why the reason why there wasn't more coverage I
suppose, police shooting a white guy isn't news.

You don't read much about the ~300 murders a year in Baltimore unless
you read the Sun.

To read about Baltimore, Chicago, Flint, Detroit, DC, etc. murders would be a racist
act to Krause. Ergo he knows nothing of them.

His little rant deserved the comment I made initially, nothing more.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Spot On...
 

On 1/16/2016 4:27 PM, Keyser Soze wrote:
John H. Wrote in message:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 12:04:09 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I am Irish. For many years in my native land the Rev. Ian Paisley
spouted bigoted hatred about Catholics in Northern Ireland, but then
claimed innocence when some militant sectarian group massacred
Catholics. Speech was not murder, he said. He would never condone
killing, he said. Then he went right back to feeding the attitudes that
spawned the killing. Few were fooled.

We should not be fooled in America today.

In this country the "mainstream" right-wing has made an industry of
demonizing African-Americans as "thugs" and criminals - just look at the
divergence in tone between the recent coverage of Ferguson or Baltimore
and the (mostly white) biker massacre in Waco, TX. For decades, white
America has been told that black Americans are lazy leeches, dependent
on hand-outs funded by your hard-earned taxes to bankroll their immoral
lifestyles.

The first black president was greeted by the right not only with diehard
obstructionism but a chorus of color-coded abuse ("lazy," "food-stamp
president" etc) and questions about his very American-ness: he was "not
one of us," a foreigner adhering to a foreign religion who has no right
to be president.

The siren song of racial hate relentlessly put out by the "mainstream"
right finds echo in the gunshots that rang out in Charleston.

Rightists will, of course, deny the connection, the way Paisley did. But
we are not fooled.

- - -

This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

If you think there was no coverage of the Waco biker brawl you are
just not paying attention and 177 went to jail.
Most of the people killed in the "massacre" were shot by the police.
That is probably why the reason why there wasn't more coverage I
suppose, police shooting a white guy isn't news.

You don't read much about the ~300 murders a year in Baltimore unless
you read the Sun.

To read about Baltimore, Chicago, Flint, Detroit, DC, etc. murders would be a racist
act to Krause. Ergo he knows nothing of them.

His little rant deserved the comment I made initially, nothing more.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



these posts of yours are racially motivated.



-----------------

Hey .... keep it down in here will ya's? Bone crushing, concussion
producing playoff game between Pats and Chiefs is about to start.

Spot On...
 

11:44 AMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 1/16/16 12:04 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:53:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I am Irish. For many years in my native land the Rev. Ian Paisley
spouted bigoted hatred about Catholics in Northern Ireland, but then
claimed innocence when some militant sectarian group massacred
Catholics. Speech was not murder, he said. He would never condone
killing, he said. Then he went right back to feeding the attitudes that
spawned the killing. Few were fooled.

We should not be fooled in America today.

In this country the "mainstream" right-wing has made an industry of
demonizing African-Americans as "thugs" and criminals - just look at the
divergence in tone between the recent coverage of Ferguson or Baltimore
and the (mostly white) biker massacre in Waco, TX. For decades, white
America has been told that black Americans are lazy leeches, dependent
on hand-outs funded by your hard-earned taxes to bankroll their immoral
lifestyles.

The first black president was greeted by the right not only with diehard
obstructionism but a chorus of color-coded abuse ("lazy," "food-stamp
president" etc) and questions about his very American-ness: he was "not
one of us," a foreigner adhering to a foreign religion who has no right
to be president.

The siren song of racial hate relentlessly put out by the "mainstream"
right finds echo in the gunshots that rang out in Charleston.

Rightists will, of course, deny the connection, the way Paisley did. But
we are not fooled.

- - -

This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

If you think there was no coverage of the Waco biker brawl you are
just not paying attention and 177 went to jail.
Most of the people killed in the "massacre" were shot by the police.
That is probably why the reason why there wasn't more coverage I
suppose, police shooting a white guy isn't news.

You don't read much about the ~300 murders a year in Baltimore unless
you read the Sun.


We are not fooled.
------

Who's "we?"

Spot On...
 

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right

Spot On...
 

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:55:36 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

You dispute that the right wing has made an industry of demonizing
African Americans, eh?

Then you are oblivious.

I just don't think the examples in the article are showing anything
like that.

Michael Brown was a thug who tried to take an officer's gun after
being detained for committing a strong armed robbery.

Freddie Gray was not really "demonized" in spite of being a convicted
drug dealer and a number of parole violations. There were still 5 open
cases on him when he was arrested ... again.
Three of the officers involved with his "accidental" death were
charged with murder. The other 3 are charged with an assortment of
other crimes.

In Waco everyone in that restaurant was demonized as being thugs and
nobody really clamored for an investigation about the ones who were
shot, in spite of the fact that the police probably shot a number of
them.

Spot On...
 

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:19:05 PM UTC-6, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right

Oh and the article is dated Thursday Jun 18, 2015 5:41 PM CDT

Spot On...
 

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:19:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right

===

Who would have guessed that a self proclaimed scholar like Harry would
quote something without proper attribution?

Spot On...
 

On 1/16/16 11:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right


The comment first appeared in the NYT, but even if it didn't, what
matters is that the comment is the truth: your side of the political
aisle furthers racial hate. Just ask your buddy, John Herring.

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:19:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right

===

Who would have guessed that a self proclaimed scholar like Harry would
quote something without proper attribution?

Add it to the list.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Spot On...
 

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:19:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania
under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their
top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right

===

Who would have guessed that a self proclaimed scholar like Harry would
quote something without proper attribution?

Add it to the list.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Racist and stupid: the perfect republican

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

The comment first appeared in the NYT, but even if it didn't, what
matters is that the comment is the truth

How could it be seen as truth when the three incidents referenced are
ALL mis characterized?

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:20:14 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 00:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 20:19:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania
under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their
top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right

===

Who would have guessed that a self proclaimed scholar like Harry would
quote something without proper attribution?

Add it to the list.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Racist and stupid: the perfect republican

I think you went almost a whole month without name-calling. Good job, Krause.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:27:36 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

The comment first appeared in the NYT, but even if it didn't, what
matters is that the comment is the truth

How could it be seen as truth when the three incidents referenced are
ALL mis characterized?

Better yet, just what qualifies as 'truth' with Krause? His Maryland Red Barn
undoubtedly holds a lot of ... Krausescheiße.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Spot On...
 

On 1/16/2016 4:53 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

Methinks you once again missed the point. Oh well.

Your point, "all conservatives are racist"
They're are not, you are wrong, find something new.

Mikek

Spot On...
 

amdx wrote:
On 1/16/2016 4:53 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

Methinks you once again missed the point. Oh well.

Your point, "all conservatives are racist"
They're are not, you are wrong, find something new.

Mikek


Whooooosh...

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Spot On...
 

On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 12:11:07 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 1/16/2016 4:53 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

Methinks you once again missed the point. Oh well.

Your point, "all conservatives are racist"
They're are not, you are wrong, find something new.

Mikek


Whooooosh...

I'm sure you hear that quite often, just above your head.

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 10:21:47 -0800 (PST), Its Me
wrote:

On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 12:11:07 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 1/16/2016 4:53 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

Methinks you once again missed the point. Oh well.

Your point, "all conservatives are racist"
They're are not, you are wrong, find something new.

Mikek


Whooooosh...

I'm sure you hear that quite often, just above your head.

===

Anything just above Harry's head would hit him squarely in the abdomen
or back.

Spot On...
 

8:30 AMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 1/16/16 11:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right


The comment first appeared in the NYT, but even if it didn't, what
matters is that the comment is the truth: your side of the political
aisle furthers racial hate. Just ask your buddy, John Herring.

----
*my* side of the isle??? Which side is that?
You have no idea how I'll vote that is IF I even vote at all.
Harry, I've had a heart attack and I'm not gasping for air like it seems you are...

Spot On...
 

On 1/17/16 3:39 PM, Tim wrote:

8:30 AMKeyser Söze
- hide quoted text -
On 1/16/16 11:19 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 10:53:21 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:


This is a highly cited comment in the NYTs, and it perfectly describes
what many on the conservative right are doing to continue and further
racial hate.

Need evidence here? Just read the racist and racially motivated posts
of rightest John Herring (and others).

Looks like it was conjured from the KOS to me.
"The comment was made by an anonymous NYT reader from Pennsylvania under the username: Gfagan. It was picked by the Times as one of their top comments and recommended more than 4000 times by other users..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6...instream-Right


The comment first appeared in the NYT, but even if it didn't, what
matters is that the comment is the truth: your side of the political
aisle furthers racial hate. Just ask your buddy, John Herring.

----
*my* side of the isle??? Which side is that?
You have no idea how I'll vote that is IF I even vote at all.
Harry, I've had a heart attack and I'm not gasping for air like it seems you are...



You'll vote Republican if you vote.

Spot On...
 

5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.

Spot On...
 

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?

Spot On...
 

On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

Spot On...
 

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Spot On...
 

On 1/17/16 7:18 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of
the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.



We have a two party presidential election system. There isn't a
candidate on the Republican side I would vote in for dog catcher, and
that includes Rubio.

Spot On...
 

On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:51 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.

Spot On...
 

On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.

Spot On...
 

On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Spot On...
 

On 1/17/16 9:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:51 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.



Your disdain for the American political system is almost comical.
As for my vote, as I stated, I want to contribute to the Democratic
landslide in the popular vote. As for "Reagans," your boy Ronnie never
impressed me.

Spot On...
 

On 1/18/2016 8:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/17/16 9:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:37:51 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 7:14 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:56:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside
of the two party system. And it's easily done too.


Oh, I gave you more credit than you'd get for wasting your vote. My
mistake.

Your vote is meaningless, what's your point?


Recruiting for the libertarians?

My vote for Clinton later this year will help ensure she gets out
state's EC votes and will add to her total vote nationwide. While
popular vote doesn't win the presidential election, a big landslide in
Clinton's favor has import.

So, stay home if you want, or vote for whichever Libertarian you like.

Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.



Your disdain for the American political system is almost comical.
As for my vote, as I stated, I want to contribute to the Democratic
landslide in the popular vote. As for "Reagans," your boy Ronnie never
impressed me.

But Hillery does? What a joke. RR was the last great president we're
likely to see.

Spot On...
 

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned 'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...

Spot On...
 

On 1/18/16 11:08 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned 'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...


There is no shortage of chronic liars running for the GOP nomination,
including the two at the top, and as for giving away the farm, what the
Repugs want to do is get their hands on more of the assets of the middle
class and working poor and hand it over to the rich.

Spot On...
 

On 1/18/2016 11:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 11:08 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside
of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party
mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned
'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...


There is no shortage of chronic liars running for the GOP nomination,
including the two at the top, and as for giving away the farm, what the
Repugs want to do is get their hands on more of the assets of the middle
class and working poor and hand it over to the rich.


It's so refreshing to hear something new from Krause. Snerk

Spot On...
 

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:34:42 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/17/16 9:32 PM, wrote:


Do you really think anyone but the democrat will have a snowball's
chance in hell of carrying Maryland whether you or even 20,000 of you
stayed home?
Richard is in the same situation. I don't see any Reagans out there.



Your disdain for the American political system is almost comical.
As for my vote, as I stated, I want to contribute to the Democratic
landslide in the popular vote. As for "Reagans," your boy Ronnie never
impressed me.

As usual you either missed the point or you intentionally ignored it.
Reagan won Mass in 80 and 84. He won Maryland in 84 too.
Since then Md and Mass have been solid blue and a few more GOP votes
or a few less dem votes were not going to change that.

As for the political system, are you saying that you like the EC now
or are you just trolling again? The popular vote is actually
irrelevant. Once a candidate wins a state, the rest of the votes there
are pretty much wasted.

Spot On...
 

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:47:17 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/18/16 11:08 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 7:31:40 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/18/16 2:51 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 6:18:28 PM UTC-6, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/17/2016 6:53 PM, Tim wrote:
5:35 PMKeyser Söze
- show quoted text -
You'll vote Republican if you vote.
-----

Harry, I don't think it occurres to you that you can vote outside of the two party system. And it's easily done too.



Harry can't imagine voting outside of the Democratic party. You are
asking too much.

or grasping the concept of voting your conscience, instead of party mandates.


No empathetic human could in good conscience vote for anyone in the
current crowd of Republican presidential candidates.

Well the current pot of dems look like you have an old fashioned 'give-away-the-farm' socialist and a chronic liar.

decisions, decisions...


There is no shortage of chronic liars running for the GOP nomination,
including the two at the top, and as for giving away the farm, what the
Repugs want to do is get their hands on more of the assets of the middle
class and working poor and hand it over to the rich.


Are you implying that all Republicans are in the top 1%? Are there no middle class
Republicans? Perhaps Republicans would simply like to see more people earning their
living and paying taxes on their earnings.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!