|
Purchasing a Pistol_ Enough Already!
I rode my bike to the closest FFL dealer a little over 1 mile, it will cost me $30 for his service. The gun is ordered and he emailed his Dealer number to the company. It was simple. Thanks, Mikek |
Purchasing a Pistol
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. |
Purchasing a Pistol
In article ,
says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. WTF? Is there a Stasi here? A Gestapo? No, and without the 2nd there could be. What does "revolt" have to do with that? An armed citizenry provides insurance against that. Hard to believe you get so stupid when an argument doesn't go your way. Hell, your gun nuttery has rendered you unable to understand common English. |
Purchasing a Pistol
On 1/7/2016 10:30 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" You should keep your fantasies to yourself. Who says I'm anti-gun? You, who wants every wacko to carry a piece? Get a grip. The 2nd provides protection from tyrannical government. I suspect Abe Lincoln's had that in mind when he said "by the people, for the people, of the people." So far it's working. You should read it. The difference between you and I is I'm not a gun nut. Then, what kind of nut are you? |
Purchasing a Pistol
On 1/8/2016 2:56 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. I don't think his mumbo jumbo is meant to be believed. He's just riling against conservatives like any die hard liberal would do. |
Purchasing a Pistol_ Enough Already!
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:54:32 -0600, amdx wrote:
I rode my bike to the closest FFL dealer a little over 1 mile, it will cost me $30 for his service. The gun is ordered and he emailed his Dealer number to the company. It was simple. Thanks, Mikek Enjoy it! -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Purchasing a Pistol
In article ,
says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. WTF? Is there a Stasi here? A Gestapo? No, and without the 2nd there could be. What does "revolt" have to do with that? An armed citizenry provides insurance against that. Hard to believe you get so stupid when an argument doesn't go your way. Hell, your gun nuttery has rendered you unable to understand common English. |
Purchasing a Pistol
Boating All Out wrote:
In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" You should keep your fantasies to yourself. Who says I'm anti-gun? You, who wants every wacko to carry a piece? Get a grip. The 2nd provides protection from tyrannical government. I suspect Abe Lincoln's had that in mind when he said "by the people, for the people, of the people." So far it's working. You should read it. The difference between you and I is I'm not a gun nut. Easy, Kevin. Some people collect stamps, some collect guns. |
Purchasing a Pistol
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:39:24 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:30:50 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article 5e2t8b54rsb2l98a8pqraf5gj1iiqdf5a9@ 4ax.com, says... On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 00:35:17 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 23:44:33 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:03:56 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/6/2016 11:12 AM, wrote: On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 01:14:06 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: What "facts?" Nothing relevent to this discussion. No, I just dismissed it Since you just want to ban guns, the facts you should look at is the wonderful success of banning drugs. That worked well didn't it? I don't think BOA said he *wants* to ban guns. In fact, he said he'd like to have one. He said "Me, my hands are clean. Never bought a gun. Don't want to support the death industry." So how the hell do you think that means I want to ban guns? I've said explicitly that I want the 2nd kept. It's good insurance against government. Actually I forgot about the Marlin .22 semi-auto rifle I bought for rabbit hunting years ago at Sears. But I don't rabbit hunt now, so I have no need for a gun. And I don't want to support the death industry. Got plenty of guys like you for that. I was responding to Richard's comment that you wanted a gun. It is clear how you really feel, no matter how you quibble about it. What's the quibble? You said I want to ban guns. I don't. You're the one who's quibbling. You say you want "good insurance against the government" and then you want to let the government decide who they are going to let "limit" them. I really think that armed revolt thing is not a very good reason to have the 2d amendment rights anyway but when I hear anti gun people saying it my bull**** detector goes off. You need to get your "bull**** meter" tuned up. And quit lying. Who said anything about a "revolt?" OK explain how the second amendment is insurance against the government if it isn't a revolt? You just talk gibberish and expect us to believe you. WTF? Is there a Stasi here? A Gestapo? No, and without the 2nd there could be. What does "revolt" have to do with that? An armed citizenry provides insurance against that. Hard to believe you get so stupid when an argument doesn't go your way. Hell, your gun nuttery has rendered you unable to understand common English. If you used your gun to stop the stasi or the gestapo, wouldn't that be an armed revolt? I bet the government would think so. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com