On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"

Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.

On 12/29/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


The only decent alternative to Clinton is Bernie. There are no decent
Republican alternatives.



" The definition of the word "conundrum" is: something that is puzzling or confusing.

Here are six Conundrums of Socialism in the United States of America:

1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries."


Mikek

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:55:21 -0600, amdx wrote:

On 12/29/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


The only decent alternative to Clinton is Bernie. There are no decent
Republican alternatives.



" The definition of the word "conundrum" is: something that is puzzling or confusing.

Here are six Conundrums of Socialism in the United States of America:

1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries."


Mikek


Reminds me of the Muslim Conundrum:


Lets have a look at the evidence:
- No Christmas
- No television
- No nude women
- No football
- No pork chops
- No hot dogs
- No burgers
- No beer
- No bacon
- Rags for clothes
- Towels for hats
- Constant wailing from some idiot in a tower
- More than one wife
- More than one mother in law
- You can't shave
- Your wife can't shave
- You can't wash off the smell of donkey
- You cook over burning camel ****
- Your wife is picked by someone else for you
- and your wife smells worse than your donkey
Then they tell you that "when you die, it all gets better"??
Well no sh*t Sherlock!....

It's not like it could get much worse!
THE MUSLIMS ARE NOT HAPPY!

They're not happy in Gaza ..
They're not happy in Egypt .
They're not happy in Libya ..
They're not happy in Morocco ..
They're not happy in Iran ..
They're not happy in Iraq .
They're not happy in Yemen ..
They're not happy in Afghanistan ..
They're not happy in Pakistan ..
They're not happy in Syria .
They're not happy in Lebanon ..

SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY?

They're happy in Australia .
They're happy in Canada ....
They're happy in England ...
They're happy in France .....
They're happy in Italy .
They're happy in Germany .....
They're happy in Sweden ..
They're happy in the USA ....
They're happy in Norway ..
They're happy in Holland ....
They're happy in Denmark .

Basically, they're happy in every country that is not Muslim
And unhappy in every country that is!

AND WHO DO THEY BLAME?

Not Islam.
Not their leadership.
Not themselves.

THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!

AND THEN; They want to change those countries to be like....
THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"

Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.

You can't seriously say Nixon represented today's "GOP".
Nor Reagan. They were Democrats in todays terms.
Today's GOP is a mongrelization of the old GOP. Today's
GOP wants a revolution. And they're too stupid to see they
would be on the losing side of it. Trump is probably the
GOP's best bet, since he's hard to pin down. The rest of
them have obviously bad ideas. They're all losers.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:25:56 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"

Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.

You can't seriously say Nixon represented today's "GOP".
Nor Reagan. They were Democrats in todays terms.
Today's GOP is a mongrelization of the old GOP. Today's
GOP wants a revolution. And they're too stupid to see they
would be on the losing side of it. Trump is probably the
GOP's best bet, since he's hard to pin down. The rest of
them have obviously bad ideas. They're all losers.

No argument here but four more years of Bush Clinton is not any
better.

Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).
They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.
Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"
Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.
You can't seriously say Nixon represented today's "GOP".
Nor Reagan. They were Democrats in todays terms.
Today's GOP is a mongrelization of the old GOP. Today's
GOP wants a revolution. And they're too stupid to see they
would be on the losing side of it. Trump is probably the
GOP's best bet, since he's hard to pin down. The rest of
them have obviously bad ideas. They're all losers.
Losers, Kevin? Really?