![]() |
david duke likes trump
On 12/30/15 10:35 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:27:59 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/30/2015 9:21 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 6:11 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 12/30/2015 12:54 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/29/15 9:59 PM, wrote: On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:12:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Indeed, my narrow outlook on life prevents me from voting for assholes like Trump and Cruz. Yet you would vote for a lying asshole like Clinton (pick one) Pull the rooster boy All politicians tell stretchers, even or especially your libertarians. I think Mrs. Clinton is far less of a liar than Trump, Cruz, Rubio, Christie, and the rest of the GOP pack, and will not move the country backwards. It's more like making a course correction from where we are currently heading. Oh, really? It's a lot more than a course correction. It's lower taxes for the rich, weakening of workplace safety standards, weakening of environmental standards, more money wasted on the military, more privatization of what should be public functions, draconian immigration policies, more wars with boots on the ground, more exportation of U.S.jobs, weakening of food and drug standards, further deterioration of public schools and funding for them, attacks on societal gains made by women and by various minorities - Figured that would put a nickel in you. Ha. I thought 'draconian immigration policies' was cute. My grandfather thought they were pretty reasonable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working, accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters. Insulting my grandfather doesn't explain the 'draconian immigration policies' comment. You must be referring to the immigration policies applicable to the Germans, French, Dutch, etc., desiring to immigrate. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Your boy Trump and several of the other GOP asshole wannabes want to round up millions of illegals and... The "and" is significant, for reasons you wouldn't comprehend. |
david duke likes trump
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans, though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple. Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points. |
david duke likes trump
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working, accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters. Yeah but those hard working Mexicans would have put those lazy union workers out of work. We are seeing it here right now. Without the Mexicans, it is taking the contractors about 2 extra months to build a house. |
david duke likes trump
|
david duke likes trump
|
david duke likes trump
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans, though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple. Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points. Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm. Low information democrat? ;-) BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them on a card in your wallet. I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation of those talking points. |
david duke likes trump
On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans, though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple. Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points. Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm. Low information democrat? ;-) BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them on a card in your wallet. I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation of those talking points. Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in the issues in the upcoming election(s). You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges. |
david duke likes trump
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans, though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple. Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points. Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm. Low information democrat? ;-) BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them on a card in your wallet. I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation of those talking points. Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in the issues in the upcoming election(s). You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges. Getting backed into a corner continuously must be a bitch. Or, maybe Greg just wasn't 'entitled' to an answer, eh? I have to admit, since our little discussion, you've done very well at squelching the name-calling. Congratulations. I knew you could do it. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
david duke likes trump
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote: On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans, though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple. Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points. Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm. Low information democrat? ;-) BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them on a card in your wallet. I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation of those talking points. Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in the issues in the upcoming election(s). You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges. Getting backed into a corner continuously must be a bitch. Or, maybe Greg just wasn't 'entitled' to an answer, eh? I have to admit, since our little discussion, you've done very well at squelching the name-calling. Congratulations. I knew you could do it. -- Ban idiots, not guns! I'm sure your observation about "corners" pleases you, but as usual it is totally inaccurate -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com