david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 9:27 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/30/2015 9:21 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 6:11 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:54 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:59 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:12:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Indeed, my narrow outlook on life prevents me from voting for
assholes
like Trump and Cruz.

Yet you would vote for a lying asshole like Clinton (pick one)

Pull the rooster boy


All politicians tell stretchers, even or especially your
libertarians. I
think Mrs. Clinton is far less of a liar than Trump, Cruz, Rubio,
Christie, and the rest of the GOP pack, and will not move the country
backwards.


It's more like making a course correction from where we are currently
heading.

Oh, really? It's a lot more than a course correction. It's lower taxes
for the rich, weakening of workplace safety standards, weakening of
environmental standards, more money wasted on the military, more
privatization of what should be public functions, draconian immigration
policies, more wars with boots on the ground, more exportation of
U.S.jobs, weakening of food and drug standards, further deterioration of
public schools and funding for them, attacks on societal gains made by
women and by various minorities -


Figured that would put a nickel in you. Ha.



I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

===

You always welcome the chance to advocate for a bigger, more intrusive
government. Personally I'd like to see harsher penalties for tax
cheaters and dead beats.

david duke likes trump
 

On 12/30/15 10:35 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:27:59 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 12/30/2015 9:21 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/30/15 6:11 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:54 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/29/15 9:59 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:12:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Indeed, my narrow outlook on life prevents me from voting for assholes
like Trump and Cruz.

Yet you would vote for a lying asshole like Clinton (pick one)

Pull the rooster boy


All politicians tell stretchers, even or especially your libertarians. I
think Mrs. Clinton is far less of a liar than Trump, Cruz, Rubio,
Christie, and the rest of the GOP pack, and will not move the country
backwards.


It's more like making a course correction from where we are currently
heading.

Oh, really? It's a lot more than a course correction. It's lower taxes
for the rich, weakening of workplace safety standards, weakening of
environmental standards, more money wasted on the military, more
privatization of what should be public functions, draconian immigration
policies, more wars with boots on the ground, more exportation of
U.S.jobs, weakening of food and drug standards, further deterioration of
public schools and funding for them, attacks on societal gains made by
women and by various minorities -


Figured that would put a nickel in you. Ha.


I thought 'draconian immigration policies' was cute. My grandfather thought they were
pretty reasonable.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working,
accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters.

Insulting my grandfather doesn't explain the 'draconian immigration policies'
comment. You must be referring to the immigration policies applicable to the Germans,
French, Dutch, etc., desiring to immigrate.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Your boy Trump and several of the other GOP asshole wannabes want to
round up millions of illegals and... The "and" is significant, for
reasons you wouldn't comprehend.

david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.

david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working,
accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters.

Yeah but those hard working Mexicans would have put those lazy union
workers out of work.
We are seeing it here right now. Without the Mexicans, it is taking
the contractors about 2 extra months to build a house.

david duke likes trump
 

On 12/30/15 11:13 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:23:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Had they been stricter, we might have gotten a family of hard-working,
accomplished Mexicans, instead of a family of squirrel hunters.

Yeah but those hard working Mexicans would have put those lazy union
workers out of work.
We are seeing it here right now. Without the Mexicans, it is taking
the contractors about 2 extra months to build a house.


I wasn't aware that union workers were building tract houses in Florida.

david duke likes trump
 

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.

david duke likes trump
 

On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.


Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges.

david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.


Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges.

Getting backed into a corner continuously must be a bitch. Or, maybe Greg just wasn't
'entitled' to an answer, eh?

I have to admit, since our little discussion, you've done very well at squelching the
name-calling. Congratulations. I knew you could do it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

david duke likes trump
 

John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 12/30/15 12:22 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:44:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/30/15 11:11 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 10:21:54 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


I always appreciate a chance to tell the truth about the GOP's plans,
though, considering the audience here, I kept it simple.

Only in the sense that you "simply" quoted the DNC talking points.


Really? I haven't read them. Hmmm.

Low information democrat? ;-)

BTW we all know that is bull**** since the talking points have not
changed much since the Carter administration. You probably have them
on a card in your wallet.

I notice you did not address any of the challenges to your recitation
of those talking points.


Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

You are correct in that I did not "address" what you call challenges.

Getting backed into a corner continuously must be a bitch. Or, maybe Greg just wasn't
'entitled' to an answer, eh?

I have to admit, since our little discussion, you've done very well at squelching the
name-calling. Congratulations. I knew you could do it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


I'm sure your observation about "corners" pleases you, but as usual it is
totally inaccurate


--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

david duke likes trump
 

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

david duke likes trump
 

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"

Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.

david duke likes trump
 

On 12/29/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


The only decent alternative to Clinton is Bernie. There are no decent
Republican alternatives.



" The definition of the word "conundrum" is: something that is puzzling or confusing.

Here are six Conundrums of Socialism in the United States of America:

1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries."


Mikek

david duke likes trump
 

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:55:21 -0600, amdx wrote:

On 12/29/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:


The only decent alternative to Clinton is Bernie. There are no decent
Republican alternatives.



" The definition of the word "conundrum" is: something that is puzzling or confusing.

Here are six Conundrums of Socialism in the United States of America:

1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.

2. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.

3. They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.

4. Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.

5. The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.

6. They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries."


Mikek


Reminds me of the Muslim Conundrum:


Lets have a look at the evidence:
- No Christmas
- No television
- No nude women
- No football
- No pork chops
- No hot dogs
- No burgers
- No beer
- No bacon
- Rags for clothes
- Towels for hats
- Constant wailing from some idiot in a tower
- More than one wife
- More than one mother in law
- You can't shave
- Your wife can't shave
- You can't wash off the smell of donkey
- You cook over burning camel ****
- Your wife is picked by someone else for you
- and your wife smells worse than your donkey
Then they tell you that "when you die, it all gets better"??
Well no sh*t Sherlock!....

It's not like it could get much worse!
THE MUSLIMS ARE NOT HAPPY!

They're not happy in Gaza ..
They're not happy in Egypt .
They're not happy in Libya ..
They're not happy in Morocco ..
They're not happy in Iran ..
They're not happy in Iraq .
They're not happy in Yemen ..
They're not happy in Afghanistan ..
They're not happy in Pakistan ..
They're not happy in Syria .
They're not happy in Lebanon ..

SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY?

They're happy in Australia .
They're happy in Canada ....
They're happy in England ...
They're happy in France .....
They're happy in Italy .
They're happy in Germany .....
They're happy in Sweden ..
They're happy in the USA ....
They're happy in Norway ..
They're happy in Holland ....
They're happy in Denmark .

Basically, they're happy in every country that is not Muslim
And unhappy in every country that is!

AND WHO DO THEY BLAME?

Not Islam.
Not their leadership.
Not themselves.

THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!

AND THEN; They want to change those countries to be like....
THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

david duke likes trump
 

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"

Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.

You can't seriously say Nixon represented today's "GOP".
Nor Reagan. They were Democrats in todays terms.
Today's GOP is a mongrelization of the old GOP. Today's
GOP wants a revolution. And they're too stupid to see they
would be on the losing side of it. Trump is probably the
GOP's best bet, since he's hard to pin down. The rest of
them have obviously bad ideas. They're all losers.

david duke likes trump
 

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:25:56 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).

They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.

Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"

Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.

You can't seriously say Nixon represented today's "GOP".
Nor Reagan. They were Democrats in todays terms.
Today's GOP is a mongrelization of the old GOP. Today's
GOP wants a revolution. And they're too stupid to see they
would be on the losing side of it. Trump is probably the
GOP's best bet, since he's hard to pin down. The rest of
them have obviously bad ideas. They're all losers.

No argument here but four more years of Bush Clinton is not any
better.

david duke likes trump
 

Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 09:57:55 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 18:55:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:10:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, I have not read or seen any Democratic talking points in
the issues in the upcoming election(s).
They haven't changed since the days of leisure suits.
Only talking point, "What difference does it make?"
Harry is just playing the same song the democrats always play without
actually acknowledging that most of the gains in all of those areas
came under GOP presidents. Nixon gave us OSHA, EPA, Roe v Wade etc.
The tax cut that put almost half of the people in the US under the
threshold of paying income tax was Reagan.
OTOH we have Clinton who gave us DOMA, Wall Street deregulation, bank
deregulation, Don't ask Don't tell etc.

He would be better voting GOP if worker safety, the environment, gays,
women, low tax rates for the poor and better regulation of banks and
Wall Street are important to him.
You can't seriously say Nixon represented today's "GOP".
Nor Reagan. They were Democrats in todays terms.
Today's GOP is a mongrelization of the old GOP. Today's
GOP wants a revolution. And they're too stupid to see they
would be on the losing side of it. Trump is probably the
GOP's best bet, since he's hard to pin down. The rest of
them have obviously bad ideas. They're all losers.
Losers, Kevin? Really?