On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 6:16:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/20/15 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:17:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/20/15 1:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:48:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSpjej4OhXc

I think you will find that these goobers in fumbuck Virginia are not
as well trained and certainly not as well equipped as the typical
islamic cell.
The wogs in Paris had automatic weapons and explosives in a place
where guns are pretty much banned. The law had little effect on them.
The leader was on the 10 most wanted list in all of Europe yet he
easily moved across the continent and was found a few hundred meters
from the site of the attack almost a week later, located by Turkish
intelligence, not the French.
You try to draw the parallel between a disturbed teenager and a team
of terrorists but the death toll quickly points out the difference.
You always cite statistics but you also want to rule out 9-11 and you
ignore the muslim shooters like the guys who shot up the navy yard or
Ft Hood.
That is like saying, "other than that Mrs Lincoln, how did you like
the play".
The bottom line is 8 guys killed 130 people and wounded 368 in a few
minutes. That is not even in the same ball park with the worst mass
shooting in the US.


Oh.

In 1995, Timothy McVeigh, a white Christian terrorist born in the USA
detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building
in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people and injuring more than 600.

That's...one...guy.

Actually at least 4 (Terry Nichols, Michael and Lori Fortier) but lets
not let facts get in the way of a good rant.


I do get a chuckle over how the gut nutsies minimize the mass murders
committed with guns. I guess those killings don't count because...guns..

Interesting that you are trying to make an anti gun case and you
invoke a 20 year old bombing that dod not involve a gun.

If you are going back that far you might as well include the other WTC
attack or the police murders of women and children at Waco.


I'm making a terrorist case, and the usual but not exclusive weapon of
terrorists in this country is a gun.

Harry you have guns, are you a terrorist?

Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 6:16:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/20/15 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:17:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/20/15 1:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:48:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSpjej4OhXc

I think you will find that these goobers in fumbuck Virginia are not
as well trained and certainly not as well equipped as the typical
islamic cell.
The wogs in Paris had automatic weapons and explosives in a place
where guns are pretty much banned. The law had little effect on them.
The leader was on the 10 most wanted list in all of Europe yet he
easily moved across the continent and was found a few hundred meters
from the site of the attack almost a week later, located by Turkish
intelligence, not the French.
You try to draw the parallel between a disturbed teenager and a team
of terrorists but the death toll quickly points out the difference.
You always cite statistics but you also want to rule out 9-11 and you
ignore the muslim shooters like the guys who shot up the navy yard or
Ft Hood.
That is like saying, "other than that Mrs Lincoln, how did you like
the play".
The bottom line is 8 guys killed 130 people and wounded 368 in a few
minutes. That is not even in the same ball park with the worst mass
shooting in the US.


Oh.

In 1995, Timothy McVeigh, a white Christian terrorist born in the USA
detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building
in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people and injuring more than 600.

That's...one...guy.

Actually at least 4 (Terry Nichols, Michael and Lori Fortier) but lets
not let facts get in the way of a good rant.


I do get a chuckle over how the gut nutsies minimize the mass murders
committed with guns. I guess those killings don't count because...guns.

Interesting that you are trying to make an anti gun case and you
invoke a 20 year old bombing that dod not involve a gun.

If you are going back that far you might as well include the other WTC
attack or the police murders of women and children at Waco.


I'm making a terrorist case, and the usual but not exclusive weapon of
terrorists in this country is a gun.

Harry you have guns, are you a terrorist?


Is that an example of your reasoning processes?

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 07:48:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 6:16:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/20/15 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:17:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/20/15 1:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:48:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSpjej4OhXc

I think you will find that these goobers in fumbuck Virginia are not
as well trained and certainly not as well equipped as the typical
islamic cell.
The wogs in Paris had automatic weapons and explosives in a place
where guns are pretty much banned. The law had little effect on them.
The leader was on the 10 most wanted list in all of Europe yet he
easily moved across the continent and was found a few hundred meters
from the site of the attack almost a week later, located by Turkish
intelligence, not the French.
You try to draw the parallel between a disturbed teenager and a team
of terrorists but the death toll quickly points out the difference.
You always cite statistics but you also want to rule out 9-11 and you
ignore the muslim shooters like the guys who shot up the navy yard or
Ft Hood.
That is like saying, "other than that Mrs Lincoln, how did you like
the play".
The bottom line is 8 guys killed 130 people and wounded 368 in a few
minutes. That is not even in the same ball park with the worst mass
shooting in the US.


Oh.

In 1995, Timothy McVeigh, a white Christian terrorist born in the USA
detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building
in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people and injuring more than 600.

That's...one...guy.

Actually at least 4 (Terry Nichols, Michael and Lori Fortier) but lets
not let facts get in the way of a good rant.


I do get a chuckle over how the gut nutsies minimize the mass murders
committed with guns. I guess those killings don't count because...guns.

Interesting that you are trying to make an anti gun case and you
invoke a 20 year old bombing that dod not involve a gun.

If you are going back that far you might as well include the other WTC
attack or the police murders of women and children at Waco.


I'm making a terrorist case, and the usual but not exclusive weapon of
terrorists in this country is a gun.

Harry you have guns, are you a terrorist?


Is that an example of your reasoning processes?

Tim has thrown your reasoning process back in your face. What *is* your solution to
the 'American (not foreign), white (not black), Christian (not Muslim or other
faith), terrorist?

Please tell us.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On 11/21/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Saturday, November 21, 2015 at 6:16:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/20/15 10:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:17:24 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/20/15 1:34 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:48:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSpjej4OhXc

I think you will find that these goobers in fumbuck Virginia are not
as well trained and certainly not as well equipped as the typical
islamic cell.
The wogs in Paris had automatic weapons and explosives in a place
where guns are pretty much banned. The law had little effect on them.
The leader was on the 10 most wanted list in all of Europe yet he
easily moved across the continent and was found a few hundred meters
from the site of the attack almost a week later, located by Turkish
intelligence, not the French.
You try to draw the parallel between a disturbed teenager and a team
of terrorists but the death toll quickly points out the difference.
You always cite statistics but you also want to rule out 9-11 and you
ignore the muslim shooters like the guys who shot up the navy yard or
Ft Hood.
That is like saying, "other than that Mrs Lincoln, how did you like
the play".
The bottom line is 8 guys killed 130 people and wounded 368 in a few
minutes. That is not even in the same ball park with the worst mass
shooting in the US.


Oh.

In 1995, Timothy McVeigh, a white Christian terrorist born in the USA
detonated a truck bomb in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building
in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people and injuring more than 600.

That's...one...guy.

Actually at least 4 (Terry Nichols, Michael and Lori Fortier) but lets
not let facts get in the way of a good rant.


I do get a chuckle over how the gut nutsies minimize the mass murders
committed with guns. I guess those killings don't count because...guns.

Interesting that you are trying to make an anti gun case and you
invoke a 20 year old bombing that dod not involve a gun.

If you are going back that far you might as well include the other WTC
attack or the police murders of women and children at Waco.


I'm making a terrorist case, and the usual but not exclusive weapon of
terrorists in this country is a gun.

Harry you have guns, are you a terrorist?


Is that an example of your reasoning processes?

Sounds more like he was asking a question, not sorting facts and
fiction? Do you know the difference?