| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/4/2015 12:19 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/4/15 12:06 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 9:20 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...has a liberal bias... So, is the mainstream media really left-wing, or even liberal, as those on the right love to claim? Tt should be noted that the real world tends to have a liberal bias — at least what Ted Cruz considers a liberal bias. Take climate change, for example. The fact that the climate is warming because of human activity is a completely uncontroversial notion; it is happening, and the vast majority of scientists agree that it will be catastrophic for humanity if nothing is done very soon. That the mainstream media does not contest the issue of climate change, or claim that it is some giant left-wing conspiracy, does not prove it is liberal, but that it is operating in reality. Cruz does not operate in reality, and believes climate change (i.e. science) is a “religion.” But just because Cruz believes this, or his deranged father, Rafael, believes that evolution is a communist lie, does not mean that evolutionary biologists are communists or that climate scientists are religious fanatics — it means that Rafael Cruz and his son are delusional. http://tinyurl.com/nmqhdxk - - - Yup. How and from what sources has the "real world" been convinced that climate change is a result of human activity? Who has declared that human activity being the cause is an "uncontroversial notion"? Why, of course. Liberals and the liberal media. Right, because nearly all the scientists who agree human activity is a major contributor to global warming/climate chage are card-carrying liberals, and, of course, nearly all scientists agree. Gotta love rec.boats, the Ben Carson-approved usenet group. Sheesh. I guess the rise of man and agriculture stopped the ice age 10,000 years ago. How could that be possible when Dr. Ben believes "creation" didn't happen that far in the past? Let's keep it honest and accurate, shall we? Carson has never made a claim as to *when" mankind was created. In fact, here's a direct quote by him: " -- and I’m not a hard and fast person who says the Earth is only 6,000 years old -- " and, referencing the Bible: “It says, in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth,” “It doesn’t say when He created them except for "in the beginning." BTW, Carson *does* believe in evolution, but not on the grand scale as proposed by Darwin. He claims that according to the Bible each thing brought forth was after its own kind. Evolutionary changes *within* each species has occurred to adapt to changing climates and/or environments. He has also stated, "But in no way has a species evolved into another species". This certainly isn't the view of someone who thinks life on earth is only 6 or 10 thousand years old. Gotta keep the liberal smear machine honest once in a while..... |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/4/15 12:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/4/2015 12:19 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 12:06 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 9:20 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...has a liberal bias... So, is the mainstream media really left-wing, or even liberal, as those on the right love to claim? Tt should be noted that the real world tends to have a liberal bias — at least what Ted Cruz considers a liberal bias. Take climate change, for example. The fact that the climate is warming because of human activity is a completely uncontroversial notion; it is happening, and the vast majority of scientists agree that it will be catastrophic for humanity if nothing is done very soon. That the mainstream media does not contest the issue of climate change, or claim that it is some giant left-wing conspiracy, does not prove it is liberal, but that it is operating in reality. Cruz does not operate in reality, and believes climate change (i.e. science) is a “religion.” But just because Cruz believes this, or his deranged father, Rafael, believes that evolution is a communist lie, does not mean that evolutionary biologists are communists or that climate scientists are religious fanatics — it means that Rafael Cruz and his son are delusional. http://tinyurl.com/nmqhdxk - - - Yup. How and from what sources has the "real world" been convinced that climate change is a result of human activity? Who has declared that human activity being the cause is an "uncontroversial notion"? Why, of course. Liberals and the liberal media. Right, because nearly all the scientists who agree human activity is a major contributor to global warming/climate chage are card-carrying liberals, and, of course, nearly all scientists agree. Gotta love rec.boats, the Ben Carson-approved usenet group. Sheesh. I guess the rise of man and agriculture stopped the ice age 10,000 years ago. How could that be possible when Dr. Ben believes "creation" didn't happen that far in the past? Let's keep it honest and accurate, shall we? Carson has never made a claim as to *when" mankind was created. In fact, here's a direct quote by him: " -- and I’m not a hard and fast person who says the Earth is only 6,000 years old -- " and, referencing the Bible: “It says, in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth,” “It doesn’t say when He created them except for "in the beginning." BTW, Carson *does* believe in evolution, but not on the grand scale as proposed by Darwin. He claims that according to the Bible each thing brought forth was after its own kind. Evolutionary changes *within* each species has occurred to adapt to changing climates and/or environments. He has also stated, "But in no way has a species evolved into another species". This certainly isn't the view of someone who thinks life on earth is only 6 or 10 thousand years old. Gotta keep the liberal smear machine honest once in a while..... Gosh...you've evolved into the defender of Obnoxious Trump and Know Nothing Carson. Congrats. Oh, and the Carson quote on evolutionary change demonstrates his belief in the bible over his belief in evolution and evolutionary theory. Carson is a "creationist," ergo, a believer in superstitious bull****. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyHDJgTYi1k |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/4/2015 1:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/4/15 12:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 12:19 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 12:06 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 9:20 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...has a liberal bias... So, is the mainstream media really left-wing, or even liberal, as those on the right love to claim? Tt should be noted that the real world tends to have a liberal bias — at least what Ted Cruz considers a liberal bias. Take climate change, for example. The fact that the climate is warming because of human activity is a completely uncontroversial notion; it is happening, and the vast majority of scientists agree that it will be catastrophic for humanity if nothing is done very soon. That the mainstream media does not contest the issue of climate change, or claim that it is some giant left-wing conspiracy, does not prove it is liberal, but that it is operating in reality. Cruz does not operate in reality, and believes climate change (i.e. science) is a “religion.” But just because Cruz believes this, or his deranged father, Rafael, believes that evolution is a communist lie, does not mean that evolutionary biologists are communists or that climate scientists are religious fanatics — it means that Rafael Cruz and his son are delusional. http://tinyurl.com/nmqhdxk - - - Yup. How and from what sources has the "real world" been convinced that climate change is a result of human activity? Who has declared that human activity being the cause is an "uncontroversial notion"? Why, of course. Liberals and the liberal media. Right, because nearly all the scientists who agree human activity is a major contributor to global warming/climate chage are card-carrying liberals, and, of course, nearly all scientists agree. Gotta love rec.boats, the Ben Carson-approved usenet group. Sheesh. I guess the rise of man and agriculture stopped the ice age 10,000 years ago. How could that be possible when Dr. Ben believes "creation" didn't happen that far in the past? Let's keep it honest and accurate, shall we? Carson has never made a claim as to *when" mankind was created. In fact, here's a direct quote by him: " -- and I’m not a hard and fast person who says the Earth is only 6,000 years old -- " and, referencing the Bible: “It says, in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth,” “It doesn’t say when He created them except for "in the beginning." BTW, Carson *does* believe in evolution, but not on the grand scale as proposed by Darwin. He claims that according to the Bible each thing brought forth was after its own kind. Evolutionary changes *within* each species has occurred to adapt to changing climates and/or environments. He has also stated, "But in no way has a species evolved into another species". This certainly isn't the view of someone who thinks life on earth is only 6 or 10 thousand years old. Gotta keep the liberal smear machine honest once in a while..... Gosh...you've evolved into the defender of Obnoxious Trump and Know Nothing Carson. Congrats. Oh, and the Carson quote on evolutionary change demonstrates his belief in the bible over his belief in evolution and evolutionary theory. Carson is a "creationist," ergo, a believer in superstitious bull****. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyHDJgTYi1k Carson has a right to believe in anything he wants to believe in. He doesn't have a right to force his beliefs upon others due to a political position he may or may not hold. He has stated this on numerous occasions. Oh, and I am not "defending" anyone. I was simply correcting your implied reference to Carson believing that life on earth began within the last 10k years. Yet another "liberal" response trying to change the facts. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/4/15 1:20 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/4/2015 1:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 12:58 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 12:19 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 12:06 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 11/4/15 9:20 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 8:15 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...has a liberal bias... So, is the mainstream media really left-wing, or even liberal, as those on the right love to claim? Tt should be noted that the real world tends to have a liberal bias — at least what Ted Cruz considers a liberal bias. Take climate change, for example. The fact that the climate is warming because of human activity is a completely uncontroversial notion; it is happening, and the vast majority of scientists agree that it will be catastrophic for humanity if nothing is done very soon. That the mainstream media does not contest the issue of climate change, or claim that it is some giant left-wing conspiracy, does not prove it is liberal, but that it is operating in reality. Cruz does not operate in reality, and believes climate change (i.e. science) is a “religion.” But just because Cruz believes this, or his deranged father, Rafael, believes that evolution is a communist lie, does not mean that evolutionary biologists are communists or that climate scientists are religious fanatics — it means that Rafael Cruz and his son are delusional. http://tinyurl.com/nmqhdxk - - - Yup. How and from what sources has the "real world" been convinced that climate change is a result of human activity? Who has declared that human activity being the cause is an "uncontroversial notion"? Why, of course. Liberals and the liberal media. Right, because nearly all the scientists who agree human activity is a major contributor to global warming/climate chage are card-carrying liberals, and, of course, nearly all scientists agree. Gotta love rec.boats, the Ben Carson-approved usenet group. Sheesh. I guess the rise of man and agriculture stopped the ice age 10,000 years ago. How could that be possible when Dr. Ben believes "creation" didn't happen that far in the past? Let's keep it honest and accurate, shall we? Carson has never made a claim as to *when" mankind was created. In fact, here's a direct quote by him: " -- and I’m not a hard and fast person who says the Earth is only 6,000 years old -- " and, referencing the Bible: “It says, in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth,” “It doesn’t say when He created them except for "in the beginning." BTW, Carson *does* believe in evolution, but not on the grand scale as proposed by Darwin. He claims that according to the Bible each thing brought forth was after its own kind. Evolutionary changes *within* each species has occurred to adapt to changing climates and/or environments. He has also stated, "But in no way has a species evolved into another species". This certainly isn't the view of someone who thinks life on earth is only 6 or 10 thousand years old. Gotta keep the liberal smear machine honest once in a while..... Gosh...you've evolved into the defender of Obnoxious Trump and Know Nothing Carson. Congrats. Oh, and the Carson quote on evolutionary change demonstrates his belief in the bible over his belief in evolution and evolutionary theory. Carson is a "creationist," ergo, a believer in superstitious bull****. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyHDJgTYi1k Carson has a right to believe in anything he wants to believe in. He doesn't have a right to force his beliefs upon others due to a political position he may or may not hold. He has stated this on numerous occasions. Oh, and I am not "defending" anyone. I was simply correcting your implied reference to Carson believing that life on earth began within the last 10k years. Yet another "liberal" response trying to change the facts. Carson uses the bible as evidence that the bible is true. He's a creationist, and that sort of biblical bull**** permeates his beliefs. A creationist has no business running this country. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:04:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
Gosh...you've evolved into the defender of Obnoxious Trump and Know Nothing Carson. Congrats. Oh, and the Carson quote on evolutionary change demonstrates his belief in the bible over his belief in evolution and evolutionary theory. Carson is a "creationist," ergo, a believer in superstitious bull****. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyHDJgTYi1k You have to be into irrational beliefs in the unprovable if you believe Hillary on anything. If she had not married Bill, she might be the GOP candidate. She certainly fits the mold, Corporate lawyer, Walmart and Tyson foods board member, self made millionaire by doing basically nothing. She is just trump with tits. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:58:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 11/4/2015 12:19 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/4/15 12:06 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/4/15 9:20 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 8:15 AM, Keyser Sze wrote: ...has a liberal bias... So, is the mainstream media really left-wing, or even liberal, as those on the right love to claim? Tt should be noted that the real world tends to have a liberal bias at least what Ted Cruz considers a liberal bias. Take climate change, for example. The fact that the climate is warming because of human activity is a completely uncontroversial notion; it is happening, and the vast majority of scientists agree that it will be catastrophic for humanity if nothing is done very soon. That the mainstream media does not contest the issue of climate change, or claim that it is some giant left-wing conspiracy, does not prove it is liberal, but that it is operating in reality. Cruz does not operate in reality, and believes climate change (i.e. science) is a religion. But just because Cruz believes this, or his deranged father, Rafael, believes that evolution is a communist lie, does not mean that evolutionary biologists are communists or that climate scientists are religious fanatics it means that Rafael Cruz and his son are delusional. http://tinyurl.com/nmqhdxk - - - Yup. How and from what sources has the "real world" been convinced that climate change is a result of human activity? Who has declared that human activity being the cause is an "uncontroversial notion"? Why, of course. Liberals and the liberal media. Right, because nearly all the scientists who agree human activity is a major contributor to global warming/climate chage are card-carrying liberals, and, of course, nearly all scientists agree. Gotta love rec.boats, the Ben Carson-approved usenet group. Sheesh. I guess the rise of man and agriculture stopped the ice age 10,000 years ago. How could that be possible when Dr. Ben believes "creation" didn't happen that far in the past? Let's keep it honest and accurate, shall we? Carson has never made a claim as to *when" mankind was created. In fact, here's a direct quote by him: " -- and Im not a hard and fast person who says the Earth is only 6,000 years old -- " and, referencing the Bible: It says, in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth, It doesnt say when He created them except for "in the beginning." BTW, Carson *does* believe in evolution, but not on the grand scale as proposed by Darwin. He claims that according to the Bible each thing brought forth was after its own kind. Evolutionary changes *within* each species has occurred to adapt to changing climates and/or environments. He has also stated, "But in no way has a species evolved into another species". This certainly isn't the view of someone who thinks life on earth is only 6 or 10 thousand years old. Gotta keep the liberal smear machine honest once in a while..... Have you ever heard the term 'ingrained'? Do you think lying could be as ingrained as racism? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 11/4/2015 4:19 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:58:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 11/4/2015 12:19 PM, Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/4/15 12:06 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Sze wrote: On 11/4/15 9:20 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 11/4/2015 8:15 AM, Keyser Sze wrote: ...has a liberal bias... So, is the mainstream media really left-wing, or even liberal, as those on the right love to claim? Tt should be noted that the real world tends to have a liberal bias at least what Ted Cruz considers a liberal bias. Take climate change, for example. The fact that the climate is warming because of human activity is a completely uncontroversial notion; it is happening, and the vast majority of scientists agree that it will be catastrophic for humanity if nothing is done very soon. That the mainstream media does not contest the issue of climate change, or claim that it is some giant left-wing conspiracy, does not prove it is liberal, but that it is operating in reality. Cruz does not operate in reality, and believes climate change (i.e. science) is a religion. But just because Cruz believes this, or his deranged father, Rafael, believes that evolution is a communist lie, does not mean that evolutionary biologists are communists or that climate scientists are religious fanatics it means that Rafael Cruz and his son are delusional. http://tinyurl.com/nmqhdxk - - - Yup. How and from what sources has the "real world" been convinced that climate change is a result of human activity? Who has declared that human activity being the cause is an "uncontroversial notion"? Why, of course. Liberals and the liberal media. Right, because nearly all the scientists who agree human activity is a major contributor to global warming/climate chage are card-carrying liberals, and, of course, nearly all scientists agree. Gotta love rec.boats, the Ben Carson-approved usenet group. Sheesh. I guess the rise of man and agriculture stopped the ice age 10,000 years ago. How could that be possible when Dr. Ben believes "creation" didn't happen that far in the past? Let's keep it honest and accurate, shall we? Carson has never made a claim as to *when" mankind was created. In fact, here's a direct quote by him: " -- and Im not a hard and fast person who says the Earth is only 6,000 years old -- " and, referencing the Bible: It says, in the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth, It doesnt say when He created them except for "in the beginning." BTW, Carson *does* believe in evolution, but not on the grand scale as proposed by Darwin. He claims that according to the Bible each thing brought forth was after its own kind. Evolutionary changes *within* each species has occurred to adapt to changing climates and/or environments. He has also stated, "But in no way has a species evolved into another species". This certainly isn't the view of someone who thinks life on earth is only 6 or 10 thousand years old. Gotta keep the liberal smear machine honest once in a while..... Have you ever heard the term 'ingrained'? Do you think lying could be as ingrained as racism? No, I think that Harry suffers from "PLD" (Progressive Liberal Disease). PLD is typically demonstrated by quoting statements out of context and repeating them often enough to convince others that they are accurate. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The real world of Sarah Palin | General | |||
| Congrats, good luck, and welcome to the real world | General | |||
| Fast Boats and the REAL WORLD | ASA | |||
| Which canoe is faster in the real world | General | |||
| Back to the real world | ASA | |||