My response was clear. The Dem wannabe's do not need Fox or its audience
to be nominated or elected. There is nothing to be gained by the Dems
"debating" on Fox, so why waste the time?
The Repugnants, apparently, think they need exposure to networks other
than Fox. I don't know why. Their ship of fools seems intent on sinking
itself. I can't wait for Rubio to be questioned closely about his fairy
tale life. That'll leave who, Cruz?
Delicious.
Just the fact that you admit networks can be biased makes my point.
We really need the fairness doctrine back.
You would change your mind if the Kochs decided to buy NBC and Time
Warner.
As I have stated previously, you would have been a lot of fun in college
debates.
I made no such admission. You are attempting to extrapolate that. Once
again, the Dems *do not need* Fox or its audience.
If memory serves, NBC is owned by Comcast. Comcast is one of my least
favorite corporationist companies.
I wouldn't argue against the return of the fairness doctrine or the
elimination of "big money" and "secret PACs" from the political process.
Awwwwwwww....
Threaded Mode
