![]() |
|
#41
Mr. Luddite wrote:
I avoided this thread. I thought it was a bunch of George H. W. Bush bashing. He was and is a decent guy. Smart, too...unlike his sons. 😀 -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
#41
On 10/15/15 7:11 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:21:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 2:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 11:46 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:51:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 10:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:34:29 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article 9lrt1btkj1dvb19k8no9jek6hv48d35ve1@ 4ax.com, says... BTW are you following the story about the 12 year old who ran into a store with a loaded rifle (New Zealand). He threatened to kill everyone. Everything was there but the willingness to actually shoot someone. Do you really think culture has nothing to do with this? Sure, they're not exposed to our gun culture. Now explain that to Harry who says they watch all of the same movies and play the same video games. Our "gun culture" is built on a lot more than movies and video games, which are pretty much the same in all modern western countries. Explain that. What part of our gun culture here makes a 12 year old more likely to actually shoot someone? Since this kid had the rifle, availability had nothing to do with it. The easy availability of firearms, the failure to detect most of those with a tendency towards violence, the tremendous number of shootings in this country and the acceptance of it by people like you... Since he had the gun, availability was not the issue and the rest of your answer is gibberish unless you are simply saying we have a more violent culture. We kill more people with blunt objects that most of the western democracies do with all weapons, including bare hands. How is that a gun culture problem? It is just a violent culture problem, driven by the thug culture which has become mainstream, protected by the left. (saggy pants and hoodies for example) When people want to look like thugs and act like thugs, they kill like thugs and get killed like thugs. I suspect it is a bit more complicated than your attempts to blame what you call the "thug" culture. And yes, we do have a more violent culture and that violence towards people includes a hell of a lot more than what you think is violence. Hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. We have a lot of all three, and we don't and never have paid the sort of attention we should to these. Add in a society that doesn't really care about actual violence and the availability of guns, and voila. So now you are saying all of the mass shooters are starving, homeless, jobless people? I thought it was just because they had access to a gun. I was discussing what you refer to as thugs, which is your code word to describe a portion of black society. These are not the same people as most of the mass shooters that do their work in schools, movie theaters, shopping centers, killing students, teachers, et cetera. And, yes, hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. |
#41
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/15/15 7:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:21:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 2:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 11:46 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:51:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 10:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:34:29 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article 9lrt1btkj1dvb19k8no9jek6hv48d35ve1@ 4ax.com, says... BTW are you following the story about the 12 year old who ran into a store with a loaded rifle (New Zealand). He threatened to kill everyone. Everything was there but the willingness to actually shoot someone. Do you really think culture has nothing to do with this? Sure, they're not exposed to our gun culture. Now explain that to Harry who says they watch all of the same movies and play the same video games. Our "gun culture" is built on a lot more than movies and video games, which are pretty much the same in all modern western countries. Explain that. What part of our gun culture here makes a 12 year old more likely to actually shoot someone? Since this kid had the rifle, availability had nothing to do with it. The easy availability of firearms, the failure to detect most of those with a tendency towards violence, the tremendous number of shootings in this country and the acceptance of it by people like you... Since he had the gun, availability was not the issue and the rest of your answer is gibberish unless you are simply saying we have a more violent culture. We kill more people with blunt objects that most of the western democracies do with all weapons, including bare hands. How is that a gun culture problem? It is just a violent culture problem, driven by the thug culture which has become mainstream, protected by the left. (saggy pants and hoodies for example) When people want to look like thugs and act like thugs, they kill like thugs and get killed like thugs. I suspect it is a bit more complicated than your attempts to blame what you call the "thug" culture. And yes, we do have a more violent culture and that violence towards people includes a hell of a lot more than what you think is violence. Hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. We have a lot of all three, and we don't and never have paid the sort of attention we should to these. Add in a society that doesn't really care about actual violence and the availability of guns, and voila. So now you are saying all of the mass shooters are starving, homeless, jobless people? I thought it was just because they had access to a gun. I was discussing what you refer to as thugs, which is your code word to describe a portion of black society. These are not the same people as most of the mass shooters that do their work in schools, movie theaters, shopping centers, killing students, teachers, et cetera. And, yes, hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. Why are they hungry? We have a pretty elaborate welfare system. They can afford guns, and bullets. Lots are fat. Why do they drop out of school at rates that are many times higher than the non thugs? Seems as if violence and drugs breeds a culture of violence and drugs. Maybe we should stop the war on drugs. And the drug problem would decrease. We have spent trillions on the War on Poverty, and if anything we have a higher rate now then when LBJ started the war. Maybe the war against s the problem? |
#41
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 7:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:21:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 2:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 11:46 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:51:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 10:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:34:29 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article 9lrt1btkj1dvb19k8no9jek6hv48d35ve1@ 4ax.com, says... BTW are you following the story about the 12 year old who ran into a store with a loaded rifle (New Zealand). He threatened to kill everyone. Everything was there but the willingness to actually shoot someone. Do you really think culture has nothing to do with this? Sure, they're not exposed to our gun culture. Now explain that to Harry who says they watch all of the same movies and play the same video games. Our "gun culture" is built on a lot more than movies and video games, which are pretty much the same in all modern western countries. Explain that. What part of our gun culture here makes a 12 year old more likely to actually shoot someone? Since this kid had the rifle, availability had nothing to do with it. The easy availability of firearms, the failure to detect most of those with a tendency towards violence, the tremendous number of shootings in this country and the acceptance of it by people like you... Since he had the gun, availability was not the issue and the rest of your answer is gibberish unless you are simply saying we have a more violent culture. We kill more people with blunt objects that most of the western democracies do with all weapons, including bare hands. How is that a gun culture problem? It is just a violent culture problem, driven by the thug culture which has become mainstream, protected by the left. (saggy pants and hoodies for example) When people want to look like thugs and act like thugs, they kill like thugs and get killed like thugs. I suspect it is a bit more complicated than your attempts to blame what you call the "thug" culture. And yes, we do have a more violent culture and that violence towards people includes a hell of a lot more than what you think is violence. Hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. We have a lot of all three, and we don't and never have paid the sort of attention we should to these. Add in a society that doesn't really care about actual violence and the availability of guns, and voila. So now you are saying all of the mass shooters are starving, homeless, jobless people? I thought it was just because they had access to a gun. I was discussing what you refer to as thugs, which is your code word to describe a portion of black society. These are not the same people as most of the mass shooters that do their work in schools, movie theaters, shopping centers, killing students, teachers, et cetera. And, yes, hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. Why are they hungry? We have a pretty elaborate welfare system. They can afford guns, and bullets. Lots are fat. Why do they drop out of school at rates that are many times higher than the non thugs? Seems as if violence and drugs breeds a culture of violence and drugs. Maybe we should stop the war on drugs. And the drug problem would decrease. We have spent trillions on the War on Poverty, and if anything we have a higher rate now then when LBJ started the war. Maybe the war against s the problem? Harry assumed that "thug" meant black. I guess he is the racist since there are gangs composed of black, Hispanic, *and* white trash! |
#41
On 10/15/15 7:38 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 7:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:21:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 2:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 11:46 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:51:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 10:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:34:29 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article 9lrt1btkj1dvb19k8no9jek6hv48d35ve1@ 4ax.com, says... BTW are you following the story about the 12 year old who ran into a store with a loaded rifle (New Zealand). He threatened to kill everyone. Everything was there but the willingness to actually shoot someone. Do you really think culture has nothing to do with this? Sure, they're not exposed to our gun culture. Now explain that to Harry who says they watch all of the same movies and play the same video games. Our "gun culture" is built on a lot more than movies and video games, which are pretty much the same in all modern western countries. Explain that. What part of our gun culture here makes a 12 year old more likely to actually shoot someone? Since this kid had the rifle, availability had nothing to do with it. The easy availability of firearms, the failure to detect most of those with a tendency towards violence, the tremendous number of shootings in this country and the acceptance of it by people like you... Since he had the gun, availability was not the issue and the rest of your answer is gibberish unless you are simply saying we have a more violent culture. We kill more people with blunt objects that most of the western democracies do with all weapons, including bare hands. How is that a gun culture problem? It is just a violent culture problem, driven by the thug culture which has become mainstream, protected by the left. (saggy pants and hoodies for example) When people want to look like thugs and act like thugs, they kill like thugs and get killed like thugs. I suspect it is a bit more complicated than your attempts to blame what you call the "thug" culture. And yes, we do have a more violent culture and that violence towards people includes a hell of a lot more than what you think is violence. Hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. We have a lot of all three, and we don't and never have paid the sort of attention we should to these. Add in a society that doesn't really care about actual violence and the availability of guns, and voila. So now you are saying all of the mass shooters are starving, homeless, jobless people? I thought it was just because they had access to a gun. I was discussing what you refer to as thugs, which is your code word to describe a portion of black society. These are not the same people as most of the mass shooters that do their work in schools, movie theaters, shopping centers, killing students, teachers, et cetera. And, yes, hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. Why are they hungry? We have a pretty elaborate welfare system. They can afford guns, and bullets. Lots are fat. Why do they drop out of school at rates that are many times higher than the non thugs? Seems as if violence and drugs breeds a culture of violence and drugs. Maybe we should stop the war on drugs. And the drug problem would decrease. We have spent trillions on the War on Poverty, and if anything we have a higher rate now then when LBJ started the war. Maybe the war against s the problem? Bilious, you're a cartoon of the Tea Party. |
#41
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:22:41 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 10/15/15 7:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:21:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 2:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 11:46 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:51:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 10:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:34:29 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article 9lrt1btkj1dvb19k8no9jek6hv48d35ve1@ 4ax.com, says... BTW are you following the story about the 12 year old who ran into a store with a loaded rifle (New Zealand). He threatened to kill everyone. Everything was there but the willingness to actually shoot someone. Do you really think culture has nothing to do with this? Sure, they're not exposed to our gun culture. Now explain that to Harry who says they watch all of the same movies and play the same video games. Our "gun culture" is built on a lot more than movies and video games, which are pretty much the same in all modern western countries. Explain that. What part of our gun culture here makes a 12 year old more likely to actually shoot someone? Since this kid had the rifle, availability had nothing to do with it. The easy availability of firearms, the failure to detect most of those with a tendency towards violence, the tremendous number of shootings in this country and the acceptance of it by people like you... Since he had the gun, availability was not the issue and the rest of your answer is gibberish unless you are simply saying we have a more violent culture. We kill more people with blunt objects that most of the western democracies do with all weapons, including bare hands. How is that a gun culture problem? It is just a violent culture problem, driven by the thug culture which has become mainstream, protected by the left. (saggy pants and hoodies for example) When people want to look like thugs and act like thugs, they kill like thugs and get killed like thugs. I suspect it is a bit more complicated than your attempts to blame what you call the "thug" culture. And yes, we do have a more violent culture and that violence towards people includes a hell of a lot more than what you think is violence. Hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. We have a lot of all three, and we don't and never have paid the sort of attention we should to these. Add in a society that doesn't really care about actual violence and the availability of guns, and voila. So now you are saying all of the mass shooters are starving, homeless, jobless people? I thought it was just because they had access to a gun. I was discussing what you refer to as thugs, which is your code word to describe a portion of black society. That is not really true. I see lots of rich white kids who want to emulate that same thug culture. They dress, talk and act like the thugs you are referring to. They are also one trigger pull away from being a murderer but it is still rare. These are not the same people as most of the mass shooters that do their work in schools, movie theaters, shopping centers, killing students, teachers, et cetera. Agreed but that is also a small percentage of the murders in this country. It is just the ones that make the news. And, yes, hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. So there are no unemployed people in Europe? I also disagree that there are that many "hungry" people here. If they are, it is because they traded their EBT card for drugs. We have the fattest "poor" people in the world. |
#41
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:19:29 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 10/15/15 7:38 PM, Califbill wrote: Why are they hungry? We have a pretty elaborate welfare system. They can afford guns, and bullets. Lots are fat. Why do they drop out of school at rates that are many times higher than the non thugs? Seems as if violence and drugs breeds a culture of violence and drugs. Maybe we should stop the war on drugs. And the drug problem would decrease. We have spent trillions on the War on Poverty, and if anything we have a higher rate now then when LBJ started the war. Maybe the war against s the problem? Bilious, you're a cartoon of the Tea Party. He is certainly right about LBJ's war on poverty. It has been a horrible failure on several fronts. |
#41
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/15/15 7:38 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 7:11 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:21:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 2:15 PM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:21:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 11:46 AM, wrote: On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:51:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/15/15 10:29 AM, wrote: On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:34:29 -0500, Boating All Out wrote: In article 9lrt1btkj1dvb19k8no9jek6hv48d35ve1@ 4ax.com, says... BTW are you following the story about the 12 year old who ran into a store with a loaded rifle (New Zealand). He threatened to kill everyone. Everything was there but the willingness to actually shoot someone. Do you really think culture has nothing to do with this? Sure, they're not exposed to our gun culture. Now explain that to Harry who says they watch all of the same movies and play the same video games. Our "gun culture" is built on a lot more than movies and video games, which are pretty much the same in all modern western countries. Explain that. What part of our gun culture here makes a 12 year old more likely to actually shoot someone? Since this kid had the rifle, availability had nothing to do with it. The easy availability of firearms, the failure to detect most of those with a tendency towards violence, the tremendous number of shootings in this country and the acceptance of it by people like you... Since he had the gun, availability was not the issue and the rest of your answer is gibberish unless you are simply saying we have a more violent culture. We kill more people with blunt objects that most of the western democracies do with all weapons, including bare hands. How is that a gun culture problem? It is just a violent culture problem, driven by the thug culture which has become mainstream, protected by the left. (saggy pants and hoodies for example) When people want to look like thugs and act like thugs, they kill like thugs and get killed like thugs. I suspect it is a bit more complicated than your attempts to blame what you call the "thug" culture. And yes, we do have a more violent culture and that violence towards people includes a hell of a lot more than what you think is violence. Hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. We have a lot of all three, and we don't and never have paid the sort of attention we should to these. Add in a society that doesn't really care about actual violence and the availability of guns, and voila. So now you are saying all of the mass shooters are starving, homeless, jobless people? I thought it was just because they had access to a gun. I was discussing what you refer to as thugs, which is your code word to describe a portion of black society. These are not the same people as most of the mass shooters that do their work in schools, movie theaters, shopping centers, killing students, teachers, et cetera. And, yes, hunger breeds violence, joblessness breeds violence, poverty breeds violence, homelessness breeds violence, illness breeds violence. Why are they hungry? We have a pretty elaborate welfare system. They can afford guns, and bullets. Lots are fat. Why do they drop out of school at rates that are many times higher than the non thugs? Seems as if violence and drugs breeds a culture of violence and drugs. Maybe we should stop the war on drugs. And the drug problem would decrease. We have spent trillions on the War on Poverty, and if anything we have a higher rate now then when LBJ started the war. Maybe the war against s the problem? Bilious, you're a cartoon of the Tea Party. Another non answer. What a f'n idiot. |
#41
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:14:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all... Didn't you just buy another gun, Harry? So he's got 41 and you've got a dozen or so. That makes him a jerk? Would it be funny if someone broke into your house and stole your collection? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#41
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:
eyser Söze On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. "The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all..." Don't think it's really smart for Ditzy to be bragging about all those guns on the Internet. I imagine they have more than their fair share of criminals in Pompano Beach and I doubt there are too many Ditzy Dan Krugers there. Have you missed all the posts from Harry bragging about his gun and ammo collection? I don't suppose you'll answer this. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#41
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 12:49:44 -0700, jps wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:08:57 -0400, Alex wrote: This one is nice. A Ruger New Model Single Six in .22LR and stainless steel. Brand new but made in 1975. An unfired 40 year-old gun from the manufacture's collection. It also comes with the original box, manuals, and a certificate of authenticity signed by Mike Fifer. Almost time for another safe! The only question is which of them will be your choice to off yourself when you're ready to go? 17,000 suicides by gun each year in the US and it's been proven that guns in the house increase the odds of a suicide. Do you reckon mental stability, or lack thereof, may also be a factor? Why have you not asked Harry the same question? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#41
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:54:36 -0700, jps wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:19:19 -0700, Califbill billnews wrote: jps wrote: On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:08:57 -0400, Alex wrote: This one is nice. A Ruger New Model Single Six in .22LR and stainless steel. Brand new but made in 1975. An unfired 40 year-old gun from the manufacture's collection. It also comes with the original box, manuals, and a certificate of authenticity signed by Mike Fifer. Almost time for another safe! The only question is which of them will be your choice to off yourself when you're ready to go? 17,000 suicides by gun each year in the US and it's been proven that guns in the house increase the odds of a suicide. So? Maybe if we made it easier, the nutcases would off themselves before shooting a bunch of innocents and suicide by cop. I would expect no less calloused a response from someone who clearly hasn't been touched by a suicide in the family nor are you apparently capable of the empathy required to understand the plight of the severely depressed, the imbalanced or the family surrounding them. Are you implying that mental state may have more to do with the suicide than the gun? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#41
On 10/17/15 12:37 PM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:14:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all... Didn't you just buy another gun, Harry? So he's got 41 and you've got a dozen or so. That makes him a jerk? Would it be funny if someone broke into your house and stole your collection? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Do you always return from one of these old white men RV non-camping trips with your nose so full of snot that you feel obligated to blow it out into .wrecked.bloats? It's been almost pleasant in here during your absence. Oh, I don't have a "dozen or so" firearms. I have a few I use regularly at the range and a pair of engraved revolvers I bought as an "investment" years. Typically, I keep a firearm until or unless I get bored with it, and if I do, I sell it. All of my firearms are kept "safely." |
#41
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:14:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all... Didn't you just buy another gun, Harry? So he's got 41 and you've got a dozen or so. That makes him a jerk? Would it be funny if someone broke into your house and stole your collection? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Since I don't live in a "tract" house he might be referring to someone else who has 41 firearms. His narcissism is out of control. |
#41
John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote: eyser Söze On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. "The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all..." Don't think it's really smart for Ditzy to be bragging about all those guns on the Internet. I imagine they have more than their fair share of criminals in Pompano Beach and I doubt there are too many Ditzy Dan Krugers there. Have you missed all the posts from Harry bragging about his gun and ammo collection? I don't suppose you'll answer this. -- Ban idiots, not guns! Of course he won't. He has strict orders from his hero. |
#41
On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 11:50:22 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/17/15 12:37 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:14:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all... Didn't you just buy another gun, Harry? So he's got 41 and you've got a dozen or so. That makes him a jerk? Would it be funny if someone broke into your house and stole your collection? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Do you always return from one of these old white men RV non-camping trips .... Wow, I didn't know John went camping with Bernie Sanders and Harry Reid. Hope he got their autographs. Or maybe they should have gotten his... |
#41
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 12:50:19 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/17/15 12:37 PM, John H. wrote: On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:14:50 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/11/15 9:01 AM, True North wrote: Better get a few more, Ditzy. The boogie man is coming. The jerk bought *another* gun? It's going to be damned funny when someone breaks into his tract house and steals them all... Didn't you just buy another gun, Harry? So he's got 41 and you've got a dozen or so. That makes him a jerk? Would it be funny if someone broke into your house and stole your collection? -- Ban idiots, not guns! Do you always return from one of these old white men RV non-camping trips with your nose so full of snot that you feel obligated to blow it out into .wrecked.bloats? It's been almost pleasant in here during your absence. Oh, I don't have a "dozen or so" firearms. I have a few I use regularly at the range and a pair of engraved revolvers I bought as an "investment" years. Typically, I keep a firearm until or unless I get bored with it, and if I do, I sell it. All of my firearms are kept "safely." There was nothing inflammatory in my post. Simply asked questions based on your comments. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com