On 10/13/2015 3:34 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/13/15 12:48 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/13/15 11:08 AM, Califbill wrote:



Never said college and education should not be subsidized. I stated
that
for education for self enjoyment should not be.

Bilious, it's not my problem if you didn't enjoy your college courses. I
enjoyed many, if not all, of mine. Oh, wait...was that allowed? Perhaps
you are referring to electives...electives were required, and I did take
a couple that had only peripheral connections to my majors, and I did
enjoy them.

Education for self-enjoyment. Now there is a concept. Are you referring
to guitar lessons? Making rubber molds for dildos? I managed to work in
some courses in art history, music, and archeology. Perhaps you should
have worked in some courses in English as she is written.



I enjoyed college. Except for some ****ty professors, was great. And
electives are needed. But to have a four year+ regimen of studies, that
lead to no useful skills, is a waste of taxpayer money. Society pays for
primary schools, so our youth can be contributing members of society.
Not
to make them good at Trivial Pursuit. Big problem in certain large
cities
is the amount of youths who forgo education and decide dealing drugs and
robbery is going to be their contribution.


I'm fairly certain you are not in charge of deciding what comprises
"useful skills. We also differ on the purpose of education. You and most
others here have the trade school concept...you get educated in order to
get and hold a job. I think the purpose of education is to instill a
desire to learn, and to teach students how to use their minds, and where
to go to acquire the facts they need in order to make intelligent
decisions.


Lovely thoughts but most people like to eat.