Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife.
Suck it, Donnie! |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alex
"A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. Suck it, Donnie!" If she's married to you she not only deserves that gun but probably needs it. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:17:12 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:
Alex "A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. Suck it, Donnie!" If she's married to you she not only deserves that gun but probably needs it. Have you resolved your inner turmoil over RVs yet, donne'? It must be hell loving the idea of getting one but having to put them down for harry's sake. Let me know when you want more info on them. We can keep it hidden from YKW. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True North wrote:
Alex "A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. Suck it, Donnie!" If she's married to you she not only deserves that gun but probably needs it. Funny stuff! You spend all day wondering about other people's lives rather than living your own. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/30/2015 6:58 PM, Alex wrote:
True North wrote: Alex "A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. Suck it, Donnie!" If she's married to you she not only deserves that gun but probably needs it. Funny stuff! You spend all day wondering about other people's lives rather than living your own. He's waiting for wifey's permission. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:46:19 -0400, Alex wrote:
A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. === Why not a Sig Sauer P238? Darn nice gun. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/29/2015 9:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:46:19 -0400, Alex wrote: A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. === Why not a Sig Sauer P238? Darn nice gun. I agree. I had a S&W Bodyguard .380 for a "carry" pistol. Didn't like it at all. Trigger pull was ridiculously long and with my state's requirement of a 10lb pull I'd end up pointing the thing at the ground by the time it fired. Also had jamming issues (stovepiping) although it may have simply been that I didn't have it long enough to properly break it in. I traded it back in for a Sig Sauer P238. Much nicer feel overall and no jams. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/29/2015 9:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:46:19 -0400, Alex wrote: A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. === Why not a Sig Sauer P238? Darn nice gun. I agree. I had a S&W Bodyguard .380 for a "carry" pistol. Didn't like it at all. Trigger pull was ridiculously long and with my state's requirement of a 10lb pull I'd end up pointing the thing at the ground by the time it fired. Also had jamming issues (stovepiping) although it may have simply been that I didn't have it long enough to properly break it in. I traded it back in for a Sig Sauer P238. Much nicer feel overall and no jams. ..380's are notorious for needing a break in period. She will get plenty of range time. The deciding factor was the size. She has small hands. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/30/2015 8:03 PM, Alex wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/29/2015 9:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:46:19 -0400, Alex wrote: A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. === Why not a Sig Sauer P238? Darn nice gun. I agree. I had a S&W Bodyguard .380 for a "carry" pistol. Didn't like it at all. Trigger pull was ridiculously long and with my state's requirement of a 10lb pull I'd end up pointing the thing at the ground by the time it fired. Also had jamming issues (stovepiping) although it may have simply been that I didn't have it long enough to properly break it in. I traded it back in for a Sig Sauer P238. Much nicer feel overall and no jams. .380's are notorious for needing a break in period. She will get plenty of range time. The deciding factor was the size. She has small hands. It will probably be fine for her then. The problem I had with it was a tendency to pull the barrel down simply by pulling the trigger back to fire. It has a long pull for a small gun. I suppose you could have it customized. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/1/2015 12:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 9/30/2015 8:03 PM, Alex wrote: Mr. Luddite wrote: On 9/29/2015 9:28 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:46:19 -0400, Alex wrote: A Smith and Wesson Bodyguard .380 for the wife. === Why not a Sig Sauer P238? Darn nice gun. I agree. I had a S&W Bodyguard .380 for a "carry" pistol. Didn't like it at all. Trigger pull was ridiculously long and with my state's requirement of a 10lb pull I'd end up pointing the thing at the ground by the time it fired. Also had jamming issues (stovepiping) although it may have simply been that I didn't have it long enough to properly break it in. I traded it back in for a Sig Sauer P238. Much nicer feel overall and no jams. .380's are notorious for needing a break in period. She will get plenty of range time. The deciding factor was the size. She has small hands. It will probably be fine for her then. The problem I had with it was a tendency to pull the barrel down simply by pulling the trigger back to fire. It has a long pull for a small gun. I suppose you could have it customized. harry knows a gunsmith who could give it a 1lb double action trigger. What a joy that would be to stuff in your pocket. ;-) |