| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Yo John & Tim
#37 is on its way. A brand new Ruger from their factory collection.
This one is a Model 44 Carbine Anniversary Edition made over 30 years ago. I'm working on something VERY unique for, hopefully, #38! |
Yo John & Tim
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:56:57 -0400, Alex wrote:
#37 is on its way. A brand new Ruger from their factory collection. This one is a Model 44 Carbine Anniversary Edition made over 30 years ago. I'm working on something VERY unique for, hopefully, #38! This one? I like #36 better. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 7:57:32 PM UTC-4, Alex wrote:
#37 is on its way. A brand new Ruger from their factory collection. This one is a Model 44 Carbine Anniversary Edition made over 30 years ago. I'm working on something VERY unique for, hopefully, #38! This might be worth a couple bids. I like it. http://tinyurl.com/odfwnyt |
Yo John & Tim
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:02:40 -0700 (PDT), "John H."
wrote: On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 7:57:32 PM UTC-4, Alex wrote: #37 is on its way. A brand new Ruger from their factory collection. This one is a Model 44 Carbine Anniversary Edition made over 30 years ago. I'm working on something VERY unique for, hopefully, #38! This might be worth a couple bids. I like it. http://tinyurl.com/odfwnyt Don't be shocked at what this goes for. Those old snake guns are hot right now according to American Rifleman and their article about it only hyped up the market a little more.. |
Yo John & Tim
On Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 11:51:44 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:02:40 -0700 (PDT), "John H." wrote: On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 7:57:32 PM UTC-4, Alex wrote: #37 is on its way. A brand new Ruger from their factory collection. This one is a Model 44 Carbine Anniversary Edition made over 30 years ago. I'm working on something VERY unique for, hopefully, #38! This might be worth a couple bids. I like it. http://tinyurl.com/odfwnyt Don't be shocked at what this goes for. Those old snake guns are hot right now according to American Rifleman and their article about it only hyped up the market a little more.. I recently sold an old 3 screw Ruger Blackhawk in .357 with a 5 inch barrel. It was in good condition, but not pristine or anything. I was surprised at what it brought. |
Yo John & Tim
John H. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 7:57:32 PM UTC-4, Alex wrote: #37 is on its way. A brand new Ruger from their factory collection. This one is a Model 44 Carbine Anniversary Edition made over 30 years ago. I'm working on something VERY unique for, hopefully, #38! This might be worth a couple bids. I like it. http://tinyurl.com/odfwnyt It's in very good shape and an iconic revolver. Give it a shot! |
Yo John & Tim
I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though.
I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. |
Yo John & Tim
One day I'll get a Ruger pistol chambered in .30 Carbine to match my M1 GM/SSG
|
Yo John & Tim
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. I'm just holding out for my mini-14. One of these days. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/23/15 3:34 PM, Tim wrote:
I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. My S&W .357 revolver and my Henry .357 lever action rifle are a great pairing, and I enjoy them both. I shoot .357 almost exclusively, though I do have about 250 rounds of .38 Special on the shelf. I use those rounds in the revolver, though they do feed and fire properly in the rifle. |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/23/15 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. I'm just holding out for my mini-14. One of these days. -- $744, typically. Pretty decent accuracy on the newer models, which have heavier barrels and some other modifications. The trigger is just ok, but there are some good gunsmiths around who can fix it up into a smooth 3.5 pounder. I like the rear peep sight. I actually like the Mini 14 better than an AR in the same caliber. |
Yo John & Tim
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:44:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/23/15 3:44 PM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. I'm just holding out for my mini-14. One of these days. -- $744, typically. Pretty decent accuracy on the newer models, which have heavier barrels and some other modifications. The trigger is just ok, but there are some good gunsmiths around who can fix it up into a smooth 3.5 pounder. I like the rear peep sight. I actually like the Mini 14 better than an AR in the same caliber. Donne' gives a rat's ass about your opinions. What unit was that you were (supposedly) with in Vietnam? F'ing liar. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/23/15 4:47 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:44:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/23/15 3:44 PM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. I'm just holding out for my mini-14. One of these days. -- $744, typically. Pretty decent accuracy on the newer models, which have heavier barrels and some other modifications. The trigger is just ok, but there are some good gunsmiths around who can fix it up into a smooth 3.5 pounder. I like the rear peep sight. I actually like the Mini 14 better than an AR in the same caliber. Donne' gives a rat's ass about your opinions. What unit was that you were (supposedly) with in Vietnam? F'ing liar. -- You are such an "angry" old white racist, Herring. I'm sure the decent members of your family will rejoice when you take that long dirt nap. |
Yo John & Tim
Tim wrote:
One day I'll get a Ruger pistol chambered in .30 Carbine to match my M1 GM/SSG Get really good ear muffs. Only firearm I got rid of. Bought new, reloads would have been decent in it. My dad said, you could cook what ever you were shooting with the fireball that came out. I understand at the time, early 1970's that was 3rd noisiest handgun. 22 jet, and I forget what the other one was. |
Yo John & Tim
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I have the carbine with the 4 round tube magazine. Is that what you had? Mine hasn't been shot much but no malfunctions. http://gfretwell.com/ftp/Ruger%2044%20carbine.jpg I bought it for deer hunting but I have lost more rounds than I fired. I am not climbing down from a deer stand with a loaded gun ;-) I would buy a box magazine version in a heartbeat |
Yo John & Tim
Greg, mine was the rotary 5+1
|
Yo John & Tim
Tim wrote:
I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. I won't shoot mine. It's new and I'll keep it new as an investment. |
Yo John & Tim
Tim wrote:
One day I'll get a Ruger pistol chambered in .30 Carbine to match my M1 GM/SSG Do/did they make one? I have and inside source at the factory. |
Yo John & Tim
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 21:32:44 UTC-3, Alex wrote:
Tim wrote: One day I'll get a Ruger pistol chambered in .30 Carbine to match my M1 GM/SSG Do/did they make one? I have and inside source at the factory. Well, aren't you special! What do you do...send him a box of #8 Robinson screws on occasion. Snerk...big time operator. |
Yo John & Tim
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 21:52:43 UTC-3, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 September 2015 21:32:44 UTC-3, Alex wrote: Tim wrote: One day I'll get a Ruger pistol chambered in .30 Carbine to match my M1 GM/SSG Do/did they make one? I have and inside source at the factory. Well, aren't you special! What do you do...send him a box of #8 Robinson screws on occasion. Snerk...big time operator. Dedicated to Ditzy... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQCVTJTPTHE |
Yo John & Tim
|
Yo John & Tim
On 9/23/15 9:00 PM, Tim wrote:
Sure do Alex. Ruger Blackhawk .30 carbine. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ML-E4uRrEaw Not much different in power than a .357 mag... |
Yo John & Tim
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:49:35 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/23/15 4:47 PM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:44:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/23/15 3:44 PM, John H. wrote: On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:34:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: I bought a brand new .44 carbine in 1977 (?) and loved it with the exception of the 5 round in-stock magazine had problems jamming. I sold it because of that issue. I'm sure that after 40+ years they got it lined out. Nice having a rifle and revolver that shared the same cartridge though. I also had a .357 lever gun to share with my Dan Wesson for a while. But the lever gun just wasn't for me so off it went too. I'm just holding out for my mini-14. One of these days. -- $744, typically. Pretty decent accuracy on the newer models, which have heavier barrels and some other modifications. The trigger is just ok, but there are some good gunsmiths around who can fix it up into a smooth 3.5 pounder. I like the rear peep sight. I actually like the Mini 14 better than an AR in the same caliber. Donne' gives a rat's ass about your opinions. What unit was that you were (supposedly) with in Vietnam? F'ing liar. -- You are such an "angry" old white racist, Herring. I'm sure the decent members of your family will rejoice when you take that long dirt nap. What unit was that, Krause? Just another lie? F'ing liar. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/2015 10:34 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 10:19 AM, Tim wrote: Actually the 357 is a superior cartridge. But it won't fit In a m1 carbine. I have a carbine. If I could find a decent 357 auto load rifle I'd have it to match rounds withy pistol. The Marlin 1894 was a nice rifle in 357, but just wasn't for me. Well, my experience with .357 rifles is limited to the Italian version of the Win '92 and my current Henry .357, both lever actions. I did get to shoot a couple of rounds with the Ruger Model 77 .357 bolt action and considered getting one but I have a "thing" for lever action. There might be a .357 autoload rifle out there, but I've not seen anything specific about one. There are lots of people who'd like to have one, though. The Henry .357, by the way, has a very smoooooooth action, and virtually no kick. I have a 1x4 scope/red dot on mine, and it is very accurate at 50 to 100 yards. Haven't shot it beyond 100 yards but once, and that was before I scoped it. Let me guess. You watched every episode of the rifleman. You probably envied the love and respect the kid had for his dad. |
Yo John & Tim
Actually the 357 is a superior cartridge. But it won't fit In a m1 carbine. I have a carbine. If I could find a decent 357 auto load rifle I'd have it to match rounds withy pistol. The Marlin 1894 was a nice rifle in 357, but just wasn't for me.
|
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/15 10:19 AM, Tim wrote:
Actually the 357 is a superior cartridge. But it won't fit In a m1 carbine. I have a carbine. If I could find a decent 357 auto load rifle I'd have it to match rounds withy pistol. The Marlin 1894 was a nice rifle in 357, but just wasn't for me. Well, my experience with .357 rifles is limited to the Italian version of the Win '92 and my current Henry .357, both lever actions. I did get to shoot a couple of rounds with the Ruger Model 77 .357 bolt action and considered getting one but I have a "thing" for lever action. There might be a .357 autoload rifle out there, but I've not seen anything specific about one. There are lots of people who'd like to have one, though. The Henry .357, by the way, has a very smoooooooth action, and virtually no kick. I have a 1x4 scope/red dot on mine, and it is very accurate at 50 to 100 yards. Haven't shot it beyond 100 yards but once, and that was before I scoped it. |
Yo John & Tim
But lever guns done operate well in prone position
|
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote:
But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA |
Yo John & Tim
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote: But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA Seems to be some problems with getting a new round chambered while in the prone position, even with a 'rest'. Tim's right. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/15 2:02 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote: But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA Seems to be some problems with getting a new round chambered while in the prone position, even with a 'rest'. Tim's right. -- As I stated, practice is the cure. If you're not familiar with lever action "action," you'll stumble a few times until you get it right. Of course, if you are terminally stupid, as you are, well, you'll probably never get it right. |
Yo John & Tim
Harry is like to see you effectively work that Keever while lying flat on the ground. That's why military bolt actions over took levers before WW1
|
Yo John & Tim
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:05:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 2:02 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote: But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA Seems to be some problems with getting a new round chambered while in the prone position, even with a 'rest'. Tim's right. -- As I stated, practice is the cure. If you're not familiar with lever action "action," you'll stumble a few times until you get it right. Of course, if you are terminally stupid, as you are, well, you'll probably never get it right. If you're going to use a video to prove your point, use one that doesn't refute the point. F'ing lying dummy. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/15 2:45 PM, Tim wrote:
Harry is like to see you effectively work that Keever while lying flat on the ground. That's why military bolt actions over took levers before WW1 I mostly shoot standing up or from a bench, Tim. I prefer shooting offhand and sometimes sitting down at a bench with the firearm on a rest. I don't have a reason to plop down on the group and shoot. |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/15 3:19 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:05:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 2:02 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote: But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA Seems to be some problems with getting a new round chambered while in the prone position, even with a 'rest'. Tim's right. -- As I stated, practice is the cure. If you're not familiar with lever action "action," you'll stumble a few times until you get it right. Of course, if you are terminally stupid, as you are, well, you'll probably never get it right. If you're going to use a video to prove your point, use one that doesn't refute the point. F'ing lying dummy. -- A gun bag is not a shooting rest, moron. |
Yo John & Tim
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:20:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 2:45 PM, Tim wrote: Harry is like to see you effectively work that Keever while lying flat on the ground. That's why military bolt actions over took levers before WW1 I mostly shoot standing up or from a bench, Tim. I prefer shooting offhand and sometimes sitting down at a bench with the firearm on a rest. I don't have a reason to plop down on the group and shoot. Life's a bit different when you might get shot at. But, the lack of knowledge exhibited by you and donne' is understandable. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/15 3:44 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 15:20:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 2:45 PM, Tim wrote: Harry is like to see you effectively work that Keever while lying flat on the ground. That's why military bolt actions over took levers before WW1 I mostly shoot standing up or from a bench, Tim. I prefer shooting offhand and sometimes sitting down at a bench with the firearm on a rest. I don't have a reason to plop down on the group and shoot. Life's a bit different when you might get shot at. But, the lack of knowledge exhibited by you and donne' is understandable. -- If you were getting shot at in Vietnam, it was because you deserved it. |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/2015 2:05 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 2:02 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote: But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA Seems to be some problems with getting a new round chambered while in the prone position, even with a 'rest'. Tim's right. -- As I stated, practice is the cure. If you're not familiar with lever action "action," you'll stumble a few times until you get it right. Of course, if you are terminally stupid, as you are, well, you'll probably never get it right. So you have had success putting Pavlov's theory to the test with your marksmanship. Whoopy Doo! |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/2015 3:20 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 2:45 PM, Tim wrote: Harry is like to see you effectively work that Keever while lying flat on the ground. That's why military bolt actions over took levers before WW1 I mostly shoot standing up or from a bench, Tim. I prefer shooting offhand and sometimes sitting down at a bench with the firearm on a rest. I don't have a reason to plop down on the group and shoot. Watch out for flying bullets. Oh wait, you refused to put yourself in harms way. |
Yo John & Tim
On 9/24/2015 3:24 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/24/15 3:19 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:05:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 2:02 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:35:16 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 9/24/15 12:22 PM, Tim wrote: But lever guns done operate well in prone position They do with a little practice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4pKqyWDTiA Seems to be some problems with getting a new round chambered while in the prone position, even with a 'rest'. Tim's right. -- As I stated, practice is the cure. If you're not familiar with lever action "action," you'll stumble a few times until you get it right. Of course, if you are terminally stupid, as you are, well, you'll probably never get it right. If you're going to use a video to prove your point, use one that doesn't refute the point. F'ing lying dummy. -- A gun bag is not a shooting rest, moron. Why not? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com