On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davis’s refusal
to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious
objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were
empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a
religious commitment to pacifism?

It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses.



Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge
throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious" folks
to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped.

Yet you give Hillary, whose 'malfeasance' was much more severe, a pass.

What a f'ing hypocrite.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:21:24 AM UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davis's refusal
to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious
objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were
empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a
religious commitment to pacifism?

It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses.



Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge
throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious" folks
to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped.

Yet you give Hillary, whose 'malfeasance' was much more severe, a pass.

What a f'ing hypocrite.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Email-gate keeps rolling along. Now a Clinton staffer that helped to setup the server says he's going to "take the 5th". Heh. I think the Clinton teflon is wearing thin, and this guy doesn't want to have an "accident".

On 9/3/2015 6:41 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:21:24 AM UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davis's refusal
to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious
objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were
empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a
religious commitment to pacifism?

It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses.



Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge
throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious" folks
to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped.

Yet you give Hillary, whose 'malfeasance' was much more severe, a pass.

What a f'ing hypocrite.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Email-gate keeps rolling along. Now a Clinton staffer that helped to setup the server says he's going to "take the 5th". Heh. I think the Clinton teflon is wearing thin, and this guy doesn't want to have an "accident".



He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:
On 9/3/2015 6:41 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:21:24 AM UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davis's
refusal
to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious
objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were
empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a
religious commitment to pacifism?

It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses.



Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge
throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious"
folks
to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped.

Yet you give Hillary, whose 'malfeasance' was much more severe, a pass.

What a f'ing hypocrite.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Email-gate keeps rolling along. Now a Clinton staffer that helped to
setup the server says he's going to "take the 5th". Heh. I think the
Clinton teflon is wearing thin, and this guy doesn't want to have an
"accident".



He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

On Saturday, September 5, 2015 at 6:43:56 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:
On 9/3/2015 6:41 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 7:21:24 AM UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:32:41 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/3/15 1:39 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 15:22:01 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

I wonder how many of those supporting Kentucky clerk Kim Davis's
refusal
to issue a marriage license to a gay couple based upon her religious
objection to same-sex couples marrying would support her if she were
empowered to issue gun permits but refused to do so based upon a
religious commitment to pacifism?

It should be noted that she is not issuing ANY marriage licenses.



Willful nonfeasance by a public official. I hope the federal judge
throws the book at her. These efforts of bat**** crazy "religious"
folks
to turn this country into an ayatollahville need to be stopped.

Yet you give Hillary, whose 'malfeasance' was much more severe, a pass.

What a f'ing hypocrite.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

Email-gate keeps rolling along. Now a Clinton staffer that helped to
setup the server says he's going to "take the 5th". Heh. I think the
Clinton teflon is wearing thin, and this guy doesn't want to have an
"accident".



He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

Throughout your coulourful life I'm sure you have "taken the fifth" on several occasions, thus making you an expert on the said matter.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:43:54 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:

He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

The way prosecutors get around the 5th amendment is to grant immunity.
Then there is no incrimination and failure to testify is contempt of
court.

On 9/6/15 1:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:43:54 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:

He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

The way prosecutors get around the 5th amendment is to grant immunity.
Then there is no incrimination and failure to testify is contempt of
court.


Gosh, really?

On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 08:39:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/6/15 1:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:43:54 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:

He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

The way prosecutors get around the 5th amendment is to grant immunity.
Then there is no incrimination and failure to testify is contempt of
court.


Gosh, really?

I am curious what Hillary's in house geek has to hide.

On 9/6/2015 1:34 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:43:54 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 9/5/15 7:31 PM, amdx wrote:

He's all set to get probation if he testifies truthfully.

Mikek

D'oh. Do you even know what "taking the Fifth" means? Probably not.

The way prosecutors get around the 5th amendment is to grant immunity.
Then there is no incrimination and failure to testify is contempt of
court.

Kind of like confessing your sins to be forgiven by the gods in black robes.