New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."

The research is based on demographic changes and voter preferences
emerging at a time when older, white voters who have powered Republican
nominees are fading. The growing Latino electorate is expected to
surpass 10% of all voters in 2016, and younger white voters are trending
toward Democrats.

The findings are likely to scramble Republican strategy circles, because
the top Republican candidates are currently performing no better than
Romney among Latinos -- a problem compounded by celebrity candidate
Donald Trump's disparaging comments about Mexican immigrants.

Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor, does best with Latinos, at 27%,
according to a Univision poll this week, closely trailed by Sen. Marco
Rubio (R-Fla.) at 25%.

http://tinyurl.com/qcovwkg


Heh heh heh heh

On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 8/23/15 4:18 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---

You seem to think Latino voters are "illegal" voters. As usual, you are
uninformed.

Hardly a month goes by without the GOP wannabes ****ing off another
group of people. Who is next, people from China, Japan, Vietnam?

On 8/23/2015 3:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 4:18 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---

You seem to think Latino voters are "illegal" voters. As usual, you are
uninformed.

Ya, go ahead, nothing new about you interpreting things to fit your
liberal fog. The illegals will be voters soon enough.

Mikek


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 8/23/15 5:23 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/23/2015 3:27 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 8/23/15 4:18 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of
Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual
nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---

You seem to think Latino voters are "illegal" voters. As usual, you are
uninformed.

Ya, go ahead, nothing new about you interpreting things to fit your
liberal fog. The illegals will be voters soon enough.

Mikek



No doubt you are the end result of Fox News.

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:27:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/23/15 4:18 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---

You seem to think Latino voters are "illegal" voters. As usual, you are
uninformed.


I am not sure about the undocumented but the TV station here did not
have much problem finding resident aliens (green card) people voting.
They knocked on the door and got some of them to admit it on camera
.... nothing came of it.

On 8/23/15 10:34 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:27:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/23/15 4:18 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---

You seem to think Latino voters are "illegal" voters. As usual, you are
uninformed.


I am not sure about the undocumented but the TV station here did not
have much problem finding resident aliens (green card) people voting.
They knocked on the door and got some of them to admit it on camera
... nothing came of it.



Virtually every GOP-backed claim of "voter fraud" has turned up nothing
or very, very little.

On Mon, 24 Aug 2015 06:22:49 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/23/15 10:34 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:27:23 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/23/15 4:18 PM, amdx wrote:
On 8/22/2015 7:57 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:

New data suggest GOP 2016 nominee will need to win nearly half of Latino
vote

New research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice
of Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.

Thanks to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said
the GOP would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no
longer holds.

Now, data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.

Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.

"It's very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit
more of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's
just math."


And who said the reason liberals want more illegals is to elect more
liberals.


Heh heh heh heh

You seem orgasmic.

Mikek


---

You seem to think Latino voters are "illegal" voters. As usual, you are
uninformed.


I am not sure about the undocumented but the TV station here did not
have much problem finding resident aliens (green card) people voting.
They knocked on the door and got some of them to admit it on camera
... nothing came of it.



Virtually every GOP-backed claim of "voter fraud" has turned up nothing
or very, very little.

This was pretty cut and dried. The TV station shoved a mike in the
people's faces and asked if they were registered to vote "si". Are you
a US citizen "no" and then some conversation about why DMV would
register them if they were not allowed to vote.
They found a bunch of them.

It was simple, they compared people who were registered against people
who refused jury duty because they were not citizens. Of course some
just lied to get out of jury duty, some didn't. They lied on the voter
registration.

Politicians have no interest in pursuing this. If you lost the
election, you have no power and if you won, you do not want to
question the election that put you in power.