Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Yup...


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

“Creating one problem that is horrible — let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible — but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child?” Huckabee said. “And that’s
really the issue.”

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.

  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default Yup...

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Sze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

Creating one problem that is horrible let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child? Huckabee said. And thats
really the issue.

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.


****ing loon.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Yup...

On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Sze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

Creating one problem that is horrible let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child? Huckabee said. And thats
really the issue.

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.



****ing loon.


He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life
begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex
and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept
and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and
increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human".

Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way.

Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the
conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that
defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary.



  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Yup...

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:40:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

“Creating one problem that is horrible — let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible — but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child?” Huckabee said. “And that’s
really the issue.”

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.



****ing loon.


He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life
begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex
and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept
and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and
increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human".

Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way.

Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the
conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that
defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary.



I am pro choice but I do see some hypocrisy in people who think more
of the life of a duck than the life of a fetus.

  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Yup...

On 8/18/2015 12:52 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:40:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

“Creating one problem that is horrible — let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible — but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child?” Huckabee said. “And that’s
really the issue.”

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.


****ing loon.


He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life
begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex
and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept
and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and
increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human".

Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way.

Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the
conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that
defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary.



I am pro choice but I do see some hypocrisy in people who think more
of the life of a duck than the life of a fetus.



Hey, duck lives matter ! :-)




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2013
Posts: 780
Default Yup...

On 8/18/2015 3:45 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/18/2015 12:52 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:40:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the
weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

“Creating one problem that is horrible — let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible — but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child?” Huckabee said. “And that’s
really the issue.”

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.


****ing loon.


He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life
begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex
and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept
and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and
increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human".

Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way.

Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the
conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that
defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary.



I am pro choice but I do see some hypocrisy in people who think more
of the life of a duck than the life of a fetus.



Hey, duck lives matter ! :-)


And, gopher lives matter !
Mikek

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Yup...

On 8/18/15 12:52 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:40:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

“Creating one problem that is horrible — let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible — but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child?” Huckabee said. “And that’s
really the issue.”

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.


****ing loon.


He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life
begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex
and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept
and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and
increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human".

Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way.

Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the
conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that
defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary.



I am pro choice but I do see some hypocrisy in people who think more
of the life of a duck than the life of a fetus.


Hey, ducks are people, too.

It takes a brave dude to stalk and shoot a duck...
  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default Yup...

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:01:29 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I am pro choice but I do see some hypocrisy in people who think more
of the life of a duck than the life of a fetus.


Hey, ducks are people, too.

It takes a brave dude to stalk and shoot a duck...


But it is OK if it is a Perking Duck?
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default Yup...

On 8/17/15 10:40 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Sze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

Creating one problem that is horrible let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child? Huckabee said. And thats
really the issue.

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.



****ing loon.


He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life
begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex
and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept
and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and
increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human".

Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way.

Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the
conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that
defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary.




Utter nonsense. If Huckster had any credibility on the situation at
hand, he'd step up and pay for the child's food, shelter, housing, and
education, and provide counseling and help, and I don't mean "religious"
help, for the 11 year old mother. These religious loons are doing their
best to hang onto their outdated biblical concept of controlling women
and making women subservient to men.

Most of these outspoken anti-abortion conservatives are pro-fetus
without being certainly aren't pro-life. And that goes for your buddy
Jebbie, whose past includes legislation to shame unwed mothers who put
their kids up for adoption.




  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default Yup...

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:06:59 -0700, jps wrote:

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Sze
wrote:


Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend
that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy
to term after she was raped.

During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP
candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in
Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather.

Creating one problem that is horrible let nobody be misled, a
10-year-old girl being raped is horrible but does it solve a problem
by taking the life of an innocent child? Huckabee said. And thats
really the issue.

- - -

Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination
wannabe who feels this way.


****ing loon.


Why, because he believes a human life should not be destroyed?
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017