Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 22:40:20 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: On 8/17/2015 10:06 PM, jps wrote: On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:53:17 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee argued over the weekend that a 10-year-old girl should have been forced to carry her pregnancy to term after she was raped. During an interview on Sunday, CNN host Dana Bash asked the GOP candidate if he would refuse an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in Paraguay, who was allegedly raped by her stepfather. “Creating one problem that is horrible — let nobody be misled, a 10-year-old girl being raped is horrible — but does it solve a problem by taking the life of an innocent child?” Huckabee said. “And that’s really the issue.” - - - Unfortunately, Huckleberry isn't the only GOP presidential nomination wannabe who feels this way. ****ing loon. He's a "****ing loon" just because he happens to believe that life begins at conception? Those who believe so have a much more complex and difficult issue with abortion compared to those who simply accept and justify their pro-abortion views based on a questionable and increasingly debatable definition of what constitutes a "human". Of course it's much easier and simpler to deal with the issue that way. Advances in decoding and understanding DNA is causing a new look at the conventional wisdom as it was defined many years ago. The science that defined is also discovering new evidence to the contrary. I am pro choice but I do see some hypocrisy in people who think more of the life of a duck than the life of a fetus. |