On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:24:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If by chance Hillary *does* become the next POTUS, a problem immediately
surfaces:

Regardless of the outcome of the email investigation, she could not
pass a legitimate FBI background check for a security clearance, simply
based on the known fact that she used an unsecure, personal
server for her official government communications, mixed with all her
personal emails ... against policy and against the law.

I guess she could deal with the unclassified social issues in her agenda
(whatever it is) but she'd have to delegate much of foreign policy and
the role as Commander in Chief to someone else.


Are you amusing yourself sufficiently?

On 8/17/2015 12:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:24:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If by chance Hillary *does* become the next POTUS, a problem immediately
surfaces:

Regardless of the outcome of the email investigation, she could not
pass a legitimate FBI background check for a security clearance, simply
based on the known fact that she used an unsecure, personal
server for her official government communications, mixed with all her
personal emails ... against policy and against the law.

I guess she could deal with the unclassified social issues in her agenda
(whatever it is) but she'd have to delegate much of foreign policy and
the role as Commander in Chief to someone else.


Are you amusing yourself sufficiently?


One could ask you the same question. Are you a right handed or left
handed amuser?

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:11:28 -0400, Justan Olphat
wrote:

On 8/17/2015 12:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:24:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If by chance Hillary *does* become the next POTUS, a problem immediately
surfaces:

Regardless of the outcome of the email investigation, she could not
pass a legitimate FBI background check for a security clearance, simply
based on the known fact that she used an unsecure, personal
server for her official government communications, mixed with all her
personal emails ... against policy and against the law.

I guess she could deal with the unclassified social issues in her agenda
(whatever it is) but she'd have to delegate much of foreign policy and
the role as Commander in Chief to someone else.


Are you amusing yourself sufficiently?


One could ask you the same question. Are you a right handed or left
handed amuser?

===

I'm guessing switch hitter.

On 8/17/2015 12:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:24:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If by chance Hillary *does* become the next POTUS, a problem immediately
surfaces:

Regardless of the outcome of the email investigation, she could not
pass a legitimate FBI background check for a security clearance, simply
based on the known fact that she used an unsecure, personal
server for her official government communications, mixed with all her
personal emails ... against policy and against the law.

I guess she could deal with the unclassified social issues in her agenda
(whatever it is) but she'd have to delegate much of foreign policy and
the role as Commander in Chief to someone else.




Are you amusing yourself sufficiently?


Yup. Just watched a report of today by NBC news (of all places) of
another 305 Hillary emails that have been tagged by the intelligence
community for further review. This is not political and
the alerts are not coming from right-wing nut cases.

The current excuse offered by Hillary that "none of them were marked
"classified" when she sent or received them holds no water. It doesn't
matter. I don't think many people understand or realize this.

On 8/17/15 3:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 8/17/2015 12:48 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 12:24:30 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If by chance Hillary *does* become the next POTUS, a problem immediately
surfaces:

Regardless of the outcome of the email investigation, she could not
pass a legitimate FBI background check for a security clearance, simply
based on the known fact that she used an unsecure, personal
server for her official government communications, mixed with all her
personal emails ... against policy and against the law.

I guess she could deal with the unclassified social issues in her agenda
(whatever it is) but she'd have to delegate much of foreign policy and
the role as Commander in Chief to someone else.




Are you amusing yourself sufficiently?


Yup. Just watched a report of today by NBC news (of all places) of
another 305 Hillary emails that have been tagged by the intelligence
community for further review. This is not political and
the alerts are not coming from right-wing nut cases.

The current excuse offered by Hillary that "none of them were marked
"classified" when she sent or received them holds no water. It doesn't
matter. I don't think many people understand or realize this.



I don't think "many people" aside from the Hillary Haters give a ****.

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:05:27 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 8/17/15 3:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

Yup. Just watched a report of today by NBC news (of all places) of
another 305 Hillary emails that have been tagged by the intelligence
community for further review. This is not political and
the alerts are not coming from right-wing nut cases.

The current excuse offered by Hillary that "none of them were marked
"classified" when she sent or received them holds no water. It doesn't
matter. I don't think many people understand or realize this.



I don't think "many people" aside from the Hillary Haters give a ****.

57% of the people polled say they don't trust her. Trust is a big
issue in a POTUS.

If that number keeps going up, she will feel a need to spend more time
with her grand daughter. With any luck, Jeb will offer to baby sit.