In article ,
says...

On 28 Jul 2015 18:59:19 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Here is US Code Tile 18 Chapter 101 section 2071:


(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so
takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper,
document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of
any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any
office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term
?office? does not include the office held by any person as a retired
officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.


Harry ... maybe you might want to ponder this as Hillary
captures your infatuation with her charismatic ways.

Yawn. Was Hillary indicted? No? Just another right wing wet dream.

It is still early. I would not have bet Bill would be impeached.

As long as HRC stays away from too many gigolos she'll get by.
The others she'll just have eliminated, ala Vince Foster.
Master criminal, she is.

On 7/28/2015 6:02 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Here is US Code Tile 18 Chapter 101 section 2071:


(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so
takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper,
document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer
of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully
conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the
same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from
holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection,
the term ?office? does not include the office held by any person as a
retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.



Reminds me of a pillow label.


Ha! It does!

On 7/28/2015 6:09 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 28 Jul 2015 18:59:19 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Here is US Code Tile 18 Chapter 101 section 2071:


(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so
takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper,
document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of
any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any
office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term
?office? does not include the office held by any person as a retired
officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.


Harry ... maybe you might want to ponder this as Hillary
captures your infatuation with her charismatic ways.

Yawn. Was Hillary indicted? No? Just another right wing wet dream.

It is still early. I would not have bet Bill would be impeached.

As long as HRC stays away from too many gigolos she'll get by.
The others she'll just have eliminated, ala Vince Foster.
Master criminal, she is.



My aversion regarding Hillary Clinton as a potential POTUS has nothing
to do with Vince Foster or other rumors of a dark Clinton past. They
are nothing but unproven rumors.

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:24:04 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 7/28/2015 2:59 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
Here is US Code Tile 18 Chapter 101 section 2071:


(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates,
obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so
takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper,
document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of
any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map,
book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals,
removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any
office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term
“office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired
officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.


Harry ... maybe you might want to ponder this as Hillary
captures your infatuation with her charismatic ways.
Yawn. Was Hillary indicted? No? Just another right wing wet dream.


Will she be indicted? Unlikely. Did she willfully conceal, remove and
destroy documents that were in her custody? You betcha she did. She
can argue that most were personal emails but, because she also used the
same personal server for government communications, *all* emails should
have been checked for possible security compromises.

I was just reading that her Windows based "server" didn't have any
encryption or unique protection. It had the standard, out of the box,
Windows protection that any consumer, store bought computer has.

Were any of those destroyed documents property of the US Government and
ultimately the public?

We'll never know, will we? We just have to take Hillary's word for it.

Of course last March Hillary assured everyone that she *never* sent
emails containing classified material using her personal server. Oh,
wait a minute. Now she changed her tune. Now she says they weren't
classified *when* they were sent, but were classified later.

However, even that modified statement is at odds with what the State
Department Inspectors General found. Of a random sample of 40 emails of
the 30,000 that Hillary submitted, four contained material that was
*always* classified. Secret, no less. The 40 emails are all the
Inspectors General office has been allowed to review so far.

I suppose in time we'll hear another modification to the story by
Hillary. This is the Clinton way. If you can't hide it completely,
dribble the truth out slowly, so the pieces can't be easily fit together.

Arrogance, dishonesty and deceitfulness.

Do any of those bother Harry? No, they define his essential character. Most likely
those traits are what Harry sees as 'charisma' emanating from Hillary.


He'll cast his vote for Hillary while he rubs one off staring at his
worn photo of Sarah Palin.