| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 7/28/2015 7:29 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/28/15 6:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/28/2015 5:38 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/28/15 3:54 PM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:39:46 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 7/28/2015 10:05 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: As for Mrs. Clinton, she has tens of millions of dedicated followers. So do Lemmings. Jim Webb is not without his flaws although I don't find them particularly negative. He's serious, can exhibit a bit of a temper and doesn't kowtow to anyone. He's a Democrat but has an independent streak in him. He doesn't necessarily follow the "party line" if it's something he doesn't believe in. I like that. And that's probably why Harry doesn't like him. I never said or even implied I didn't like Jim Webb. I don't think he has much charisma, and I'm not impressed with him as a possible candidate for POTUS. He seems a perfectly decent guy, though. I wish you right-wingers would learn how to read and comprehend what you read. He's perfectly decent ... in a rather non-liberal way. I'm not sure you righties even know what liberal and conservative mean anymore. Thank you for your observation but the world does not revolve around Harry Krause's interpretations or definitions. We are all entitled to our own. Besides, the terms (as used today) are moving goalposts. In today's world JFK would be considered a conservative and Reagan would probably be considered too liberal. |