Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:43:55 -0400, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/28/2015 11:45 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/28/15 11:04 AM, wrote: On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:05:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: If you are claiming Jim Webb is charismatic, your connection to reality was severed long ago. I am not sure we have actually seen that much of Webb. As for Mrs. Clinton, she has tens of millions of dedicated followers. By definition, she is charismatic. She has a large name recognition factor and coattails from her hubby. If she was still Hillary Roddam, nobody would give her a second glance. Her credentials are as a neocon senator who was for the Iraq war and as a failed SoS who left the US is worse shape than it was when she got there. When the campaign finally gets down to looking at her record, she will be a solid 47% candidate. The only way she can win is if the GOP vote splits and that is what you keep saying here about Trump. Really? I don't see any of the GOPer wannabes beating her in a general election, especially Foot-in-Mouth Jeb. And, hey, if the Trumpster makes an Indy run, more power to him. He'd pull 10% of the vote, at least, and 95% of that would be GOPer voters. Result? Hillary wins in a landslide. Works for me. Why would you want a character like Hillery as your president? Her charisma perhaps? -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |