Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:45 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 7:29 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.


Trustworthy? What a joke.

Yawn. She's a lot more trustworthy than any of the mooks seeking the
GOP
nomination.



No question that some of the GOP candidates are making some very stupid
statements that most, including me, would never agree with.

But we are discussing "trustworthiness". I can't think of a single
thing Hillary has ever said or done that would give me a feeling that
she is a truthful, honest and trustworthy person.

The polls on the subject appear to back up my opinion.




As I said, whatever your opinion of her, she is more trustworthy than
the GOP mooks hoping to run against her.


There are no facts to back that up. There are more truths to refute it
but you have your blinders on, as always.

On 7/27/2015 7:45 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 7:29 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.


Trustworthy? What a joke.

Yawn. She's a lot more trustworthy than any of the mooks seeking the GOP
nomination.



No question that some of the GOP candidates are making some very stupid
statements that most, including me, would never agree with.

But we are discussing "trustworthiness". I can't think of a single
thing Hillary has ever said or done that would give me a feeling that
she is a truthful, honest and trustworthy person.

The polls on the subject appear to back up my opinion.



She is so smarmy. It's surprising that anyone falls for it.
Nevertheless, she bears the traits that Harry admires in a woman.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/27/15 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.


Trustworthy? What a joke.

Yawn. She's a lot more trustworthy than any of the mooks seeking the
GOP nomination.



Tim nailed it!

On 7/27/2015 7:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.

I wonder if people serving in high government positions are subject to
the FBI background checks that us mere mortals are required to undergo
for security clearances. I held security clearances both in the
military and later as a civilian because one of the DOD programs I was
involved with in business required access to classified information.
In both cases, a background check was done by the FBI which included
friends and relatives being interviewed and asked questions about my
past and current activities. I remember the civilian one well because
issuance of the clearance was held up temporarily because the FBI needed
more information as to why I traveled to the PRC back in 1986.

Both the military and the DOD have specific regulations as to how
classified information and/or documents are handled and stored.
Inspections are conducted to ensure compliance.

I know a guy (he was the president of another company involved in the
program) who was indited and sentenced to a two year house arrest
(wearing an ankle bracelet) for failure to properly maintain classified
data at his company.


So she's bending her statements to be more truthful once she's caught
lying. Purgered statements roll off the Clinton's tongues like honey. A
little vacation at Graybar Hotel might do them some good. Liberals seem
to think that lying is an entitlement for them.





--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

In article ,
says...

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.


She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it.
While she was running drugs from South America.
There's no limit to her evil doings.

On 7/27/2015 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.


She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it.
While she was running drugs from South America.
There's no limit to her evil doings.



Really? Didn't know about them.

Seriously though, this email thing is reminiscent of her claims to have
flown into Bosnia under heavy sniper fire and having to "run" from the
aircraft to the hanger.

When the press started questioning the accuracy of her story she
continued to repeat it, as if it was absolutely true. Finally, when the
evidence dug up by the media proved otherwise, her response was
basically an arrogant, "so what?"

Now she's walking down the same path about the email thing, except she's
modifying her statements in a desperate attempt to appear totally
"forthcoming". After all, she wants to be the first woman POTUS.

On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.


She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it.
While she was running drugs from South America.
There's no limit to her evil doings.



I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than
desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible
collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases,
ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that
party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK.
Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly
deserved.

In article , says...

On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.


She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it.
While she was running drugs from South America.
There's no limit to her evil doings.



I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than
desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible
collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases,
ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that
party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK.
Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly
deserved.

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.

On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.


She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it.
While she was running drugs from South America.
There's no limit to her evil doings.



I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than
desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible
collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases,
ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that
party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK.
Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly
deserved.

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".

On 7/27/15 1:45 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/27/2015 12:18 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/27/15 8:11 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...

Now Hillary is changing her story ... just a little ... again, in that
famous Clintonesque way.

This weekend, she modified her statement about sending or receiving
classified emails on her private server by saying, "I did not email
anything that was classified at the time." The "that was classified
at the time" is new. Before this weekend she claimed she never sent
any classified emails period.

Meanwhile, there is growing evidence, including from the NSA that
indeed, some of the emails contained information that was definitely
classified. Concern exists that classified information was subject to
being compromised.

She violated government policy and rules. She denies it, yet now
alludes to the fact that some of the emails "may have become
classified".

When it was requested that the server's emails be turned over for
inspection, she first refused, then selectively offered the emails she
was willing to release and "destroyed" the rest.

Trustworthy? What a joke.


She killed Vince Foster too. Got away with it.
While she was running drugs from South America.
There's no limit to her evil doings.



I think the never-ending criticism of Mrs. Clinton is little more than
desperation on the part of Republicans. That party has an incredible
collection of loudmouths, losers, racists, morons, religious nutcases,
ethnic haters, woman haters, civil rights haters, and whoever gets that
party's nomination is going to be carrying more baggage than AMTRAK.
Individually, none of them has been getting the attention so richly
deserved.

Sure seems that way. I remember back in the '90's Limbaugh going after
her viciously. First time I realized that insanity had gone mainstream.
Turned Limbaugh off my radio forever.
They'd have to get something solid on her before I'd believe it, because
they've told so many outright lies about her she's been immunized in my
eyes. I get a kick out of Luddite's "outrage" at her caginess.
She's a politician, for crying out loud. They all lie.





I get a kick out of you giving Hillary's lies and deceitfulness a pass
"because she's a politician".



Is Jeb still lying about Hillary in order to score points with the
religious nutcases that underpin the GOP?