So, how's the buddy...
 

On 7/20/2015 1:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 11:54 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...of several right wingers here doing?

"Under oath in a hotel — away from the TV cameras and the soapbox where
he did his public moralizing — Bill Cosby sketched a very different
image
of America's Dad: a philanderer who plied young women with quaaludes,
claimed to be adept at reading their unspoken desires and tried to use
his wealth to keep "Mrs. Cosby" in the dark.

"The portrait comes from Cosby's own words in a transcript of a 2005-06
deposition taken in Philadelphia. It is the only publicly available
testimony he has given in response to accusations he drugged and
sexually
assaulted dozens of women over four decades. Cosby has denied the
allegations, calling the sexual contact consensual."

- - -

Speak up, fellas, those of you who were defending Cosby and his
moralizing...

Actually I think the judge who released,the deposition should be
disbarred.
I think the judge broke the law. Was a sealed agreement between
Cosby and
the plaintiffs. Does not address my feelings about Cosby, but the judge
was truly out of line.



From what little I've seen of the incident, The Associated Press went
to court to get the deposition released. I haven't seen the filings or
any transcript of the court proceedings, but as a result of the filing,
a judge ordered the deposition released. It isn't likely the judge
"broke the law," as judges have discretion to do these sorts of things.

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.


The deposition (where Cosby admitted guilt) was taken a decade ago.
It was only recently unsealed and released.

So, how's the buddy...
 

On 7/20/15 4:03 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:30:45 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 7/20/15 2:24 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:03:53 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.

And a former democratic president it seems


More than one, but the Democratic presidents who messed around weren't
put up on the pedestal of morality preaching by conservatives.

There is a difference between "messing around" and work place sexual
harassment. Pulling your dick out in the work place and ordering a
subordinate to "kiss it" may be OK in your circles but it is a
violation of federal law.


Well, you could have just said *NO!* :)

So, how's the buddy...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 11:54 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...of several right wingers here doing?

"Under oath in a hotel — away from the TV cameras and the soapbox where
he did his public moralizing — Bill Cosby sketched a very different image
of America's Dad: a philanderer who plied young women with quaaludes,
claimed to be adept at reading their unspoken desires and tried to use
his wealth to keep "Mrs. Cosby" in the dark.

"The portrait comes from Cosby's own words in a transcript of a 2005-06
deposition taken in Philadelphia. It is the only publicly available
testimony he has given in response to accusations he drugged and sexually
assaulted dozens of women over four decades. Cosby has denied the
allegations, calling the sexual contact consensual."

- - -

Speak up, fellas, those of you who were defending Cosby and his moralizing...

Actually I think the judge who released,the deposition should be disbarred.
I think the judge broke the law. Was a sealed agreement between Cosby and
the plaintiffs. Does not address my feelings about Cosby, but the judge
was truly out of line.



From what little I've seen of the incident, The Associated Press went to
court to get the deposition released. I haven't seen the filings or any
transcript of the court proceedings, but as a result of the filing, a
judge ordered the deposition released. It isn't likely the judge "broke
the law," as judges have discretion to do these sorts of things.

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.

The commented he released the deposition because Cosby had stated on
morality. Seems as if had little to do with law in the release.

So, how's the buddy...
 

On 7/20/15 8:56 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 11:54 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...of several right wingers here doing?

"Under oath in a hotel — away from the TV cameras and the soapbox where
he did his public moralizing — Bill Cosby sketched a very different image
of America's Dad: a philanderer who plied young women with quaaludes,
claimed to be adept at reading their unspoken desires and tried to use
his wealth to keep "Mrs. Cosby" in the dark.

"The portrait comes from Cosby's own words in a transcript of a 2005-06
deposition taken in Philadelphia. It is the only publicly available
testimony he has given in response to accusations he drugged and sexually
assaulted dozens of women over four decades. Cosby has denied the
allegations, calling the sexual contact consensual."

- - -

Speak up, fellas, those of you who were defending Cosby and his moralizing...

Actually I think the judge who released,the deposition should be disbarred.
I think the judge broke the law. Was a sealed agreement between Cosby and
the plaintiffs. Does not address my feelings about Cosby, but the judge
was truly out of line.



From what little I've seen of the incident, The Associated Press went to
court to get the deposition released. I haven't seen the filings or any
transcript of the court proceedings, but as a result of the filing, a
judge ordered the deposition released. It isn't likely the judge "broke
the law," as judges have discretion to do these sorts of things.

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.

The commented he released the deposition because Cosby had stated on
morality. Seems as if had little to do with law in the release.


Hey, feel free to argue with a sitting federal judge, and see what the
outcome is, eh?

So, how's the buddy...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 8:56 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 11:54 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...of several right wingers here doing?

"Under oath in a hotel — away from the TV cameras and the soapbox where
he did his public moralizing — Bill Cosby sketched a very different image
of America's Dad: a philanderer who plied young women with quaaludes,
claimed to be adept at reading their unspoken desires and tried to use
his wealth to keep "Mrs. Cosby" in the dark.

"The portrait comes from Cosby's own words in a transcript of a 2005-06
deposition taken in Philadelphia. It is the only publicly available
testimony he has given in response to accusations he drugged and sexually
assaulted dozens of women over four decades. Cosby has denied the
allegations, calling the sexual contact consensual."

- - -

Speak up, fellas, those of you who were defending Cosby and his moralizing...

Actually I think the judge who released,the deposition should be disbarred.
I think the judge broke the law. Was a sealed agreement between Cosby and
the plaintiffs. Does not address my feelings about Cosby, but the judge
was truly out of line.



From what little I've seen of the incident, The Associated Press went to
court to get the deposition released. I haven't seen the filings or any
transcript of the court proceedings, but as a result of the filing, a
judge ordered the deposition released. It isn't likely the judge "broke
the law," as judges have discretion to do these sorts of things.

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.

The commented he released the deposition because Cosby had stated on
morality. Seems as if had little to do with law in the release.


Hey, feel free to argue with a sitting federal judge, and see what the outcome is, eh?

Never said would win. But a bad decision was made by the judge.

So, how's the buddy...
 

On 7/21/15 3:02 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 8:56 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 11:54 AM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
...of several right wingers here doing?

"Under oath in a hotel — away from the TV cameras and the soapbox where
he did his public moralizing — Bill Cosby sketched a very different image
of America's Dad: a philanderer who plied young women with quaaludes,
claimed to be adept at reading their unspoken desires and tried to use
his wealth to keep "Mrs. Cosby" in the dark.

"The portrait comes from Cosby's own words in a transcript of a 2005-06
deposition taken in Philadelphia. It is the only publicly available
testimony he has given in response to accusations he drugged and sexually
assaulted dozens of women over four decades. Cosby has denied the
allegations, calling the sexual contact consensual."

- - -

Speak up, fellas, those of you who were defending Cosby and his moralizing...

Actually I think the judge who released,the deposition should be disbarred.
I think the judge broke the law. Was a sealed agreement between Cosby and
the plaintiffs. Does not address my feelings about Cosby, but the judge
was truly out of line.



From what little I've seen of the incident, The Associated Press went to
court to get the deposition released. I haven't seen the filings or any
transcript of the court proceedings, but as a result of the filing, a
judge ordered the deposition released. It isn't likely the judge "broke
the law," as judges have discretion to do these sorts of things.

Cosby's conservative moralizing was tripped up by his hypocrisy. Happens
frequently to these well-known conservative "holier than thou" types.

The commented he released the deposition because Cosby had stated on
morality. Seems as if had little to do with law in the release.


Hey, feel free to argue with a sitting federal judge, and see what the outcome is, eh?

Never said would win. But a bad decision was made by the judge.



Hey, you are entitled to not like a judicial decision and to talk about
it. No argument about that right from me. I'm not even sure I disagree
with your opinion.

So, how's the buddy...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/20/15 10:29 AM, Tim wrote:
Who then?



I don't go digging in google newsgroup searches...

You certainly have, but in this case you chose to make **** up.