| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Lawrence O'Donnell
Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. But you find nothing wrong with lying repeatedly about the man and his statements. Who is 'defending' Trump? The arguments are against the liberals, such as you, making up **** and telling lies. Carry on. We know how you value integrity. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/15 12:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. But you find nothing wrong with lying repeatedly about the man and his statements. Who is 'defending' Trump? The arguments are against the liberals, such as you, making up **** and telling lies. Carry on. We know how you value integrity. Integrity? You? Trump? The GOP? What a laugh. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:38 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote:
wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. Krause is a fine example of what 'journalism' has become. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/2015 3:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:38 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. ? You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. Krause is a fine example of what 'journalism' has become. Fine examople? There's nothing fine about that dirtbag. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/15 1:16 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/17/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. Trump's appeal is that he is a bigot and demagogue. He's one of the birther assholes, and the birther assholes are racists. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/15 3:31 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:38 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. Krause is a fine example of what 'journalism' has become. I'd say you were a fine example of what is wrong with the military, but that would be too insulting to the military. I can't figure out why you weren't fragged. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:55:44 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/17/15 1:16 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/17/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. Trump's appeal is that he is a bigot and demagogue. He's one of the birther assholes, and the birther assholes are racists. Anyone questioning the birthplace of another is a racist. Typical. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:56:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/17/15 3:31 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:38 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. Krause is a fine example of what 'journalism' has become. I'd say you were a fine example of what is wrong with the military, but that would be too insulting to the military. I can't figure out why you weren't fragged. Maybe if you'd had the balls to be there you'd understand. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. "Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument." You really addled enough to say that after ranting about Lawrence making **** up? Holy crap, Richard. Aluminum tubes, yellowcake, WMDs (in and around Tikrit), mobile weapons labs, mushrooms clouds? Let me correct it for you... Making up **** and lying seems to be some human's way to win an argument. Lawrence's little escapade didn't result in anyone's death but I'm sure you consider him as morally bankrupt as Bush, Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, etc. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:25:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote: I think O'Donnell is an ass and have thought so for as long as he has been on the air. === I've never caught his act because I don't watch much television but you've sure convinced me. He and Harry are obviously made for each other. Harry, instead of wasting his time polluting Usenet, should try to monetize his assholishness on mass media. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Friday, July 17, 2015 at 2:25:54 PM UTC-7, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/17/2015 5:12 PM, jps wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:46:00 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. "Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument." You really addled enough to say that after ranting about Lawrence making **** up? Holy crap, Richard. Aluminum tubes, yellowcake, WMDs (in and around Tikrit), mobile weapons labs, mushrooms clouds? Let me correct it for you... Making up **** and lying seems to be some human's way to win an argument. Lawrence's little escapade didn't result in anyone's death but I'm sure you consider him as morally bankrupt as Bush, Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, etc. I think O'Donnell is an ass and have thought so for as long as he has been on the air. By bringing up such an easily checked thing, Lawrence O'Donnell showed the world that he is not the brightest bulb in the pack. Furthermore he once again showed his par for the course bias - and intellectual laziness. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
|
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/2015 5:24 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/17/2015 5:00 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:55:44 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 1:16 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 7/17/2015 9:59 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 8:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Did anyone else happen to catch Lawrence O'Donnell's performance on "Morning Joe" yesterday? O'Donnell reminds me a lot of Harry in terms of his politics and ideologically. Very liberal with no tolerance for other points of view and of the GOP in particular. He even uses some of the same words and phrases that Harry likes to use when describing (attacking) anyone with a conservative streak. Anyway, the subject was Trump and his financial statement release. O'Donnell accused Trump of lying, particularly about how much money NBC has paid him for his 14 season run of "The Apprentice". O'Donnell had no proof of his assertion that Trump was lying. He just went on a half hour emotional rant about it, using air time that was reserved for other guests and topics. It got to be a free for all at one point with Joe Scarborough ripping O'Donnell a new asshole ... for being an asshole. Even the liberal Mika Brzezinski appeared to be shell shocked with O'Donnell's rantings as were the other panel members. Later that evening on his own show "The Last Word" O'Donnell apologized profusely for his performance. He even admitted that he liked Donald Trump and Trump had sent him a message of congratulations back when O'Donnell returned to the show following a lengthy recovery from an accident he was involved in. He said that rather than sue O'Donnell for his slander on the show, Trump had offered a bet. He said he'd bet O'Donnell's yearly pay from MSNBC that his claims were accurate. O'Donnell refused, saying he's not a betting man plus ... he admitted that he could be wrong. He had no proof. Instead he just apologized again and apologized to the other Morning Joe guest who's time he used in his ranting and raving. Making up **** and lying seems to be the liberal way to win an argument but I think O'Donnell realized he attacked the wrong person this time. I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. Trump's appeal is that he is a bigot and demagogue. He's one of the birther assholes, and the birther assholes are racists. Anyone questioning the birthplace of another is a racist. Typical. I guess the new rules are, "Don't question and don't ask questions. Do as you are told and be grateful for what your government does for you." You been reading the union handbook? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/2015 5:48 PM, jps wrote:
Huh? I was pontificating on the relative moral bankruptcy of Lawrence vs. "conservatives" who apparently don't make **** up and lie to win arguments. This is the the problem with you and your ilk. You pontificate too often and too much. Nobody takes guys like you and Harry seriously. From the Cambridge dictionary: PONTIFICATE to speak or write and give your opinion about something as if you knew everything about it and as if only your opinion was correct: -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/2015 10:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:25:55 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: I think O'Donnell is an ass and have thought so for as long as he has been on the air. === I've never caught his act because I don't watch much television but you've sure convinced me. He and Harry are obviously made for each other. Harry, instead of wasting his time polluting Usenet, should try to monetize his assholishness on mass media. Harry is too shy to unleash his assholeishness on the world. He's happy within the confines of rec.boats and a few other usenet groups. Besides, there are enough pontificators in politics already. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/17/2015 5:01 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:56:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 3:31 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:38 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. Krause is a fine example of what 'journalism' has become. I'd say you were a fine example of what is wrong with the military, but that would be too insulting to the military. I can't figure out why you weren't fragged. Maybe if you'd had the balls to be there you'd understand. Where does Harry pick up on Military lingo? It makes him sound so manly. (kidding of course) :-) -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:41:39 -0400, Justan Olphat wrote:
On 7/17/2015 5:01 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:56:36 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/17/15 3:31 PM, John H. wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:11:38 -0500, Califbill billnews wrote: wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:59:27 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I'm finding it hilarious that so many conservatives, including utter trash like Ted Cruz, are "standing up for" and "defending" an outrageous demagogue like Trump. Carry on. Trump has plenty of things to criticize, it is valid to complain about why assholes like O'Donnel have to make up lies about him. Since Larry works for Comcast, I imagine someone pulled him aside and pointed out he was full of **** about what NBC paid Trump. He is just upset that Trump made more money than him. It is simple, Trump sold more ads. MSNBC is the network nobody watches. I am pretty much upset with the products of journalism schools! Where is the hard questioning of all the candidates. I am even for some rules on the " free press". You act as independent entities doing the function the press should do, you get all the constitutional protections. You start slanting, or yellow journalism the facts, that constitutional protection is not there. You have failed to be the " free press" in this case. Krause is a fine example of what 'journalism' has become. I'd say you were a fine example of what is wrong with the military, but that would be too insulting to the military. I can't figure out why you weren't fragged. Maybe if you'd had the balls to be there you'd understand. Where does Harry pick up on Military lingo? It makes him sound so manly. (kidding of course) :-) I 'spect he picks some up when shooting stumps with folks who've been there and done that. Using the 'lingo' helps him think he's assimilating. That's important to narcissists. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Ah, so racists (which includes all Republicans) and Vietnam vets (which includes a pot full of Democrats) are all liars? What a joke you are, Krause. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/15 10:25 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Ah, so racists (which includes all Republicans) and Vietnam vets (which includes a pot full of Democrats) are all liars? What a joke you are, Krause. Interesting how you go from "you" to "all" Moron. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:39:37 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 10:25 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Ah, so racists (which includes all Republicans) and Vietnam vets (which includes a pot full of Democrats) are all liars? What a joke you are, Krause. Interesting how you go from "you" to "all" Moron. Funnier how you tap dance, TOAD. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/15 11:03 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. He seems to be saying the type of things working class people like to hear. Maybe you just don't spend enough time slumming with the proletariat. There are plenty of people who blame the "Mexicans" (generic for any immigrant) for their lack of success in life. Union organizers would be at the top of that list. The union organizers I know are out organizing the Latinos into the unions...the first real part of that is a home visit in the evening to make sure the wife knows about union health and welfare benefits for the members of families. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
|
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/2015 7:18 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. Union organizers are real gentile folks, eh? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/2015 11:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 11:03 AM, wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. He seems to be saying the type of things working class people like to hear. Maybe you just don't spend enough time slumming with the proletariat. There are plenty of people who blame the "Mexicans" (generic for any immigrant) for their lack of success in life. Union organizers would be at the top of that list. The union organizers I know are out organizing the Latinos into the unions...the first real part of that is a home visit in the evening to make sure the wife knows about union health and welfare benefits for the members of families. We all know about those home visits Harry. Weren't you one of those "visitors" back when you were big and strong like bull? http://Unionfacts.org -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/2015 9:58 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Heh heh. There he goes again. Harry, are you really Lawrence O'Donnell? Sounds just like something he'd say ... and then apologize for later after the damage is done. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/2015 10:25 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Ah, so racists (which includes all Republicans) and Vietnam vets (which includes a pot full of Democrats) are all liars? What a joke you are, Krause. I think he's really Lawrence O'Donnell in disguise. Thinks and sounds just like him. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/2015 11:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 11:03 AM, wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. He seems to be saying the type of things working class people like to hear. Maybe you just don't spend enough time slumming with the proletariat. There are plenty of people who blame the "Mexicans" (generic for any immigrant) for their lack of success in life. Union organizers would be at the top of that list. The union organizers I know are out organizing the Latinos into the unions...the first real part of that is a home visit in the evening to make sure the wife knows about union health and welfare benefits for the members of families. What's the difference between a union representative knocking on your door and trying to convince you to join their union and a member of a religious group knocking on your door and trying to influence you to accept Jesus as your savior? |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/15 1:14 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/18/2015 11:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 11:03 AM, wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. He seems to be saying the type of things working class people like to hear. Maybe you just don't spend enough time slumming with the proletariat. There are plenty of people who blame the "Mexicans" (generic for any immigrant) for their lack of success in life. Union organizers would be at the top of that list. The union organizers I know are out organizing the Latinos into the unions...the first real part of that is a home visit in the evening to make sure the wife knows about union health and welfare benefits for the members of families. What's the difference between a union representative knocking on your door and trying to convince you to join their union and a member of a religious group knocking on your door and trying to influence you to accept Jesus as your savior? You'll have to figure that one out on your own. :) The union organizer, though, does offer tangible benefits for this world, the one in which we actually live. The religious people are offering pie in the sky. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On 7/18/2015 1:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/18/2015 9:58 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Heh heh. There he goes again. Harry, are you really Lawrence O'Donnell? Sounds just like something he'd say ... and then apologize for later after the damage is done. At least O'Donnell has the decency to apologise for his gross misstatements. Harry and his golden girl Hillery just keep on truckin and shovelin the crap. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 10:02:59 AM UTC-7, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/18/2015 9:58 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. Heh heh. There he goes again. Harry, are you really Lawrence O'Donnell? Sounds just like something he'd say ... and then apologize for later after the damage is done. Possible, but Harry never makes an apology to anyone for any reason. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. === A war that was started by one Democrat and heavily escalated by another. Or have you forgotten JFK and LBJ? |
Lawrence O'Donnell
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 7/18/15 9:45 AM, John H. wrote: On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 07:18:15 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 7/18/15 2:32 AM, wrote: On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:16:35 -0700, jps wrote: Trump's appeal is that he is not a politician. That's a load of crap and so is he. The Mexican people don't love him, he can't build an impenetrable wall, he has no viable plan to be the president who creates the most jobs in history. Selective listening on your part. He's a politician alright, plucking all the strings that any populist message politician would. The problem is Trump seems to appeal to low information voters and that is most of them. In my wife's circle of construction trades, mechanics, service workers and general working class folks, he seems to touch on what they want to hear. I doubt he can win an election but it will be scary how well he does and that is not just going to be republicans. Folks like Harry ignore just how many people who vote democratic are the same working class people I am talking about. Her description is Trump sounds like a union organizer and she hates him. Funny, in all the years I've worked with labor unions, I've never heard any organizer who sounded as vile as Trump. Trump has some real fans/defenders right here in .wrecked.boats. No, you're lying again. No one is defending Trump. He doesn't need it. Folks here *are* knocking those who persist in misrepresenting his comments. You're one of them. But then, we know your low opinion of integrity. Funny stuff, defending Trump the Birther Racist. But, of course, what one would expect from a racist p.o.s. like you. Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. And started by a Democrat Potus. |
Lawrence O'Donnell
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 09:58:56 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Funnier yet, your indirectly claiming "integrity" for yourself, what with your history of racism and your participation in a war of nonsense that killed 55,000 Americans and about a million Asians. === A war that was started by one Democrat and heavily escalated by another. Or have you forgotten JFK and LBJ? I'll defend JFK. He actually was for getting us out. Was Truman who,let the French back in to Indochina who started it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com