Sent by a friend with guns
 

True North wrote:
John H.
- show quoted text -
"I'm not arguing to do nothing. I'm arguing to focus on the damn problem. You and I
aren't the problem. The hoods and druggies in the inner cities are the problem. What
do you suggest be done about them? "



Maybe you and your Moppetts could round them all up and ship them somewhere else.

If you are going to play extreme stupid, stay out of the conversation.

Sent by a friend with guns
 

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 7/1/2015 3:29 PM, Califbill wrote:
"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 6/30/2015 7:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:29:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

One might think we should focus on the *behavior* of the folks committing the
homicides rather than attempting to build a bureaucracy around gun paperwork.



How do you focus on the "behavior" of people committing homicides with
guns if you don't know who has the guns in the first place?

===

Almost all of those guns are illegally owned. It is totally naive to
think that a new law or two will change that.


How many of those illegally owned guns started out as "legally" owned guns?

It's a start. All it involves is a requirement for a background check
and registration of the firearm to establish a chain of custody.

No big deal and no infringement of anyone's "rights".

You can not stop car thefts, boat thefts, home burglary, etc. how can all
gun thefts can be prevented?



Never said "all". I am realistic about that.

We all agree that guns in the hands of nutcases or those of criminal
intent is a danger in our society. Yet, whenever a suggestion or
proposal is made to try to limit their availability (with absolutely no
affect on responsible gun ownership), the answers range from "it won't
work" to the slippery slope argument. So, nothing changes ... in fact
the problem only becomes worse. Eventually it will become a problem that
simply cannot be ignored with corrective measures far more severe than a
background check and gun registration.

In other words, if it cannot be managed ... eventually they will be
banned. When that happens those who refuse to try to fix it now will
wish they had.

Banned will cause real social unrest!!! The war on guns will be as
successful as the War on Drugs. We have lost the WonD. Figure out
something else and the gun murders will plummet.

Sent by a friend with guns
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:42:14 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I'm not arguing to do nothing. I'm arguing to focus on the damn problem. You and I
aren't the problem. The hoods and druggies in the inner cities are the problem. What
do you suggest be done about them?



For one thing we can try to make their access to firearms more difficult.

===

Here's a modest proposal. Since we all agree that people are killing
each other over drugs and drug money, why not decriminalize all drug
use and drug possession. Then take it a step further by supplying
registered drug users with all the drugs they want. Some European
countries have adopted a similar model and they don't have the
problems that we do. Sure, a certain number of people will OD or
otherwise become unproductive but most of them are already
unproductive. Education and good parenting should be sufficient to
keep proliferation under control.

Require birth control substance be added to all drugs. Cut down on unwed
births, and if a druggie, should not be having kids.

Sent by a friend with guns
 

Justan Olphat
On 7/1/2015 8:09 PM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 19:39:54 UTC-3, Mr. Luddite *wrote:
On 7/1/2015 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 4:24:27 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/1/2015 3:41 PM, John H wrote:
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:34:11 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/30/2015 7:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:29:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
- show quoted text -
"Special test? What kind of special test? "
--

Respectfully submitted by Justan




For dementia as a start, Stinky.
Worried that you might fail?

Sent by a friend with guns
 

On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 04:30:04 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Justan Olphat
On 7/1/2015 8:09 PM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 19:39:54 UTC-3, Mr. Luddite *wrote:
On 7/1/2015 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 4:24:27 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/1/2015 3:41 PM, John H wrote:
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:34:11 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/30/2015 7:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:29:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
- show quoted text -
"Special test? What kind of special test? "
--

Respectfully submitted by Justan




For dementia as a start, Stinky.
Worried that you might fail?


Well, it's for damn sure you wouldn't own a bb gun, Don. Do you think Harry would
pass your test?
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

Sent by a friend with guns
 

JohnnyMop swishes....

"Well, it's for damn sure you wouldn't own a bb gun, Don. Do you think Harry would
pass your test?"



My my Johnny sounds like you're afraid of any kind of dementia test...I don't blame you. You and Kalif Swill would have to melt those gun collections down into something useful.

Sent by a friend with guns
 

On 7/2/2015 7:30 AM, True North wrote:
Justan Olphat
On 7/1/2015 8:09 PM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 19:39:54 UTC-3, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/1/2015 4:49 wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 4:24:27 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/1/2015 3:41 PM, John H wrote:
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:34:11 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/30/2015 7:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:29:16 -0400, "Mr.
- show quoted text -
"Special test? What kind of special test?"
--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

For dementia as a start, Stinky.
Worried that you might fail?


How would your low brain output skew the results of that test?

Here's a FYI for you. Normally, if you submit your reply below the "--"
it will be discarded from future replies. If you don't comprehend this,
ask Harry to explain it to you.
Bye for now, dimwit. ;-)
--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

Sent by a friend with guns
 

True North wrote:
Justan Olphat
On 7/1/2015 8:09 PM, True North wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 19:39:54 UTC-3, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/1/2015 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 at 4:24:27 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 7/1/2015 3:41 PM, John H wrote:
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:34:11 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 6/30/2015 7:57 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:29:16 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
- show quoted text -
"Special test? What kind of special test?"


Exactly! Are you still quoting challenged, SFB?

Sent by a friend with guns
 

True North wrote:
JohnnyMop swishes....

"Well, it's for damn sure you wouldn't own a bb gun, Don. Do you think Harry would
pass your test?"



My my Johnny sounds like you're afraid of any kind of dementia test...I
don't blame you. You and Kalif Swill would have to melt those gun
collections down into something useful.

Actually, you being Canadian, that statement could put you in jail. Hate
speech. At least the Canadian.'s I am meeting while here in BC, are all
nice. And they are from Ontario and Alberta besides BC. What is it about
Halifax?

Sent by a friend with guns
 

Califbill wrote:
True North wrote:
JohnnyMop swishes....

"Well, it's for damn sure you wouldn't own a bb gun, Don. Do you think Harry would
pass your test?"



My my Johnny sounds like you're afraid of any kind of dementia test...I
don't blame you. You and Kalif Swill would have to melt those gun
collections down into something useful.
Actually, you being Canadian, that statement could put you in jail. Hate
speech. At least the Canadian.'s I am meeting while here in BC, are all
nice. And they are from Ontario and Alberta besides BC. What is it about
Halifax?


The Trailer Park Boys influence. They all hope to be them.