|
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 8:29:50 AM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote: On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://www.washingtontimes.com/multi...uns-under-500/ Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch. For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right? I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Stovepipes and FTF in semi-autos are primarily either using the wrong (cheap?) ammo or an issue with a particular pistol. Finding the ammo a pistol likes and sticking to it, or correcting the issue and keeping the pistol clean makes a semi very reliable. I've fired hundreds of rounds through both of my CZ82 Maks, and have never had a single failure. |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
That's one thing I like about my Hungarian. It piped on me when I shot a couple rounds of .380 in it and the results were to be expected. Otherwise it's handled and performed flawlessly. One thing I like about it, is that in double action it has a hard trigger pull. I belive it was designed that way.. It's a police issue and that feature would help on a judgement call. Once cocked the trigger is smooth and not hairpin.
It's a nice small gun. |
Quote:
Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On 5/1/2015 1:51 AM, RGrew176 wrote:
Mr. Luddite;1032876 Wrote: On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote:- On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://tinyurl.com/kt7vawl Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch.- For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. - There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right?- I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. I had a S&W M&P Bodyguard 380 for a while but ended up trading it back in. To meet Massachusetts safety requirements the trigger pull was very long and has a 10lb pull. By the time you fired a round the pistol was aimed too low. I thought it was just me but when I brought it back to the dealer he said others have complained about the same thing. Light gun, 10lb trigger and long pull. Your finger pulled the gun down as you pulled the trigger. It would have been fine if it was the only gun you used. I could adjust for it. The problem was then going to another handgun like the Walther or other larger gun and remembering not to adjust. I like the little Sig Sauer. Just about the same size as the Bodyguard but doesn't seem to share the same issue. Maybe it's a case of how they are balanced. |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On 5/1/2015 8:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2015 1:51 AM, RGrew176 wrote: Mr. Luddite;1032876 Wrote: On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote:- On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://tinyurl.com/kt7vawl Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch.- For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. - There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right?- I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. I had a S&W M&P Bodyguard 380 for a while but ended up trading it back in. To meet Massachusetts safety requirements the trigger pull was very long and has a 10lb pull. By the time you fired a round the pistol was aimed too low. I thought it was just me but when I brought it back to the dealer he said others have complained about the same thing. Light gun, 10lb trigger and long pull. Your finger pulled the gun down as you pulled the trigger. It would have been fine if it was the only gun you used. I could adjust for it. The problem was then going to another handgun like the Walther or other larger gun and remembering not to adjust. I like the little Sig Sauer. Just about the same size as the Bodyguard but doesn't seem to share the same issue. Maybe it's a case of how they are balanced. I hear Kahr made their PM9 series Mass. legal. Hopefully they didn't crappify the pistol in the process. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On Fri, 1 May 2015 06:51:07 +0100, RGrew176 wrote:
Mr. Luddite;1032876 Wrote: On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote:- On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://tinyurl.com/kt7vawl Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch.- For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. - There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right?- I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. The Sig P938 with the De Santis Nemesis holster is a great combination also. http://tinyurl.com/nb43aha Like one of the reviewers said, in a front jeans pocket it's very comfortable, easy to draw, and not at all noticeable. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner behavior causes problems. |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On 5/1/2015 8:18 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 5/1/2015 8:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2015 1:51 AM, RGrew176 wrote: Mr. Luddite;1032876 Wrote: On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote:- On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://tinyurl.com/kt7vawl Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch.- For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. - There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right?- I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. I had a S&W M&P Bodyguard 380 for a while but ended up trading it back in. To meet Massachusetts safety requirements the trigger pull was very long and has a 10lb pull. By the time you fired a round the pistol was aimed too low. I thought it was just me but when I brought it back to the dealer he said others have complained about the same thing. Light gun, 10lb trigger and long pull. Your finger pulled the gun down as you pulled the trigger. It would have been fine if it was the only gun you used. I could adjust for it. The problem was then going to another handgun like the Walther or other larger gun and remembering not to adjust. I like the little Sig Sauer. Just about the same size as the Bodyguard but doesn't seem to share the same issue. Maybe it's a case of how they are balanced. I hear Kahr made their PM9 series Mass. legal. Hopefully they didn't crappify the pistol in the process. One requirement is a 10lb trigger pull on *all* handguns. It's not a big deal on larger, heavier handguns but can affect the lightweight ones. In the case of the Bodyguard it was the 10lb pull plus the long action of the trigger that messed me up. |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On 5/1/2015 8:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/1/2015 8:18 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 5/1/2015 8:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2015 1:51 AM, RGrew176 wrote: Mr. Luddite;1032876 Wrote: On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote:- On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://tinyurl.com/kt7vawl Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch.- For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. - There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right?- I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. I had a S&W M&P Bodyguard 380 for a while but ended up trading it back in. To meet Massachusetts safety requirements the trigger pull was very long and has a 10lb pull. By the time you fired a round the pistol was aimed too low. I thought it was just me but when I brought it back to the dealer he said others have complained about the same thing. Light gun, 10lb trigger and long pull. Your finger pulled the gun down as you pulled the trigger. It would have been fine if it was the only gun you used. I could adjust for it. The problem was then going to another handgun like the Walther or other larger gun and remembering not to adjust. I like the little Sig Sauer. Just about the same size as the Bodyguard but doesn't seem to share the same issue. Maybe it's a case of how they are balanced. I hear Kahr made their PM9 series Mass. legal. Hopefully they didn't crappify the pistol in the process. One requirement is a 10lb trigger pull on *all* handguns. It's not a big deal on larger, heavier handguns but can affect the lightweight ones. In the case of the Bodyguard it was the 10lb pull plus the long action of the trigger that messed me up. 10 lb single action mode too? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Bang for your buck: Best handguns under $500
On 5/1/2015 8:47 AM, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 5/1/2015 8:26 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2015 8:18 AM, Justan Olphart wrote: On 5/1/2015 8:12 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/1/2015 1:51 AM, RGrew176 wrote: Mr. Luddite;1032876 Wrote: On 4/30/2015 6:46 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 11:27 PM, Tim wrote:- On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 4:40:03 AM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote:- On 4/29/15 7:15 AM, Tim wrote: http://tinyurl.com/kt7vawl Interesting little reviews. Feh. All semi-autos, not a great choice for uber-reliable handguns, and nothing very special in the bunch.- For less than $500. a piece I'd take any of them. Of course in my hands they'd get limited use. I dont' go to a range just to burn up boxes of ammunition and see how soon I can wear one out. But I really don't need one. In my small bore line My Hungarian Mak.9mm does the job. And I haven't run through 300 rds. in 20 years . Gave $150 for it new, then. I still think I got a bargain. - There literally are dozens of pretty much better handguns you can buy for $500 or less than those depicted, including some top drawer or near top drawer revolvers, which is what I would pick these days for a conceal carry or nightstand pistol. As for shooting a pistol, well, I don't see how you can become adept with a particular one unless you practice with it at the range. It takes an awful lot of ammo to "wear out" a decent firearm. Plus, you can almost always replace a barrel. Aren't you a Mosin fan? Those military surplus rifles pretty much have clapped out barrels before they get into your hands, right?- I have a different opinion on revolvers vs pistols. I actually prefer revolvers and it is what I keep on my nightstand beside my bed at night. It's ready to fire in an emergency, either in double or single action but it's not being handled, carried or subject to being caught in a holster or clothing. But for concealed carry I prefer a pistol for a couple of reasons. First, they can be smaller and slimmer. Second, and you can call me overly cautious, but on the few occasions that I carry I think a pistol is safer. There's no exposed hammer (at least on the ones I own) that can get hung up and inadvertently cocked. I also don't carry with a round in the chamber making it very unlikely that a round could ever go off accidentally. I know many disagree with this practice but it is my feeling that I can afford the extra second or two required to rack the pistol if I ever had to use it ... which, we all know is very unlikely. I think not having a round in the chamber along with the gun's safety offsets the slight but still possible potential of an inadvertent discharge. Your reasons listed above is one of the big reasons that I purchased my Smith and Wesson M & P Shield 9MM. I can carry it in my pocket if I desire. It is a striker fire weapon no exposed hammer. I have no problem retrieving it from a pocket. It has a safety so I do carry it with a round in the chamber. As I am pulling it from the holster or pocket I am flicking off the safety with my thumb. It might be a little quicker than your racking a round but I agree with you it is safer to carry it without a chambered round unless you have a safety. I had a S&W M&P Bodyguard 380 for a while but ended up trading it back in. To meet Massachusetts safety requirements the trigger pull was very long and has a 10lb pull. By the time you fired a round the pistol was aimed too low. I thought it was just me but when I brought it back to the dealer he said others have complained about the same thing. Light gun, 10lb trigger and long pull. Your finger pulled the gun down as you pulled the trigger. It would have been fine if it was the only gun you used. I could adjust for it. The problem was then going to another handgun like the Walther or other larger gun and remembering not to adjust. I like the little Sig Sauer. Just about the same size as the Bodyguard but doesn't seem to share the same issue. Maybe it's a case of how they are balanced. I hear Kahr made their PM9 series Mass. legal. Hopefully they didn't crappify the pistol in the process. One requirement is a 10lb trigger pull on *all* handguns. It's not a big deal on larger, heavier handguns but can affect the lightweight ones. In the case of the Bodyguard it was the 10lb pull plus the long action of the trigger that messed me up. 10 lb single action mode too? Good question. I'll have to check on the only revolver I have left ... the .38 Chief's Special. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com