Hey John...
 

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 08:56:15 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 4/1/2015 8:13 AM, True North wrote:
Ditzy Dan...the CounterMan babbles......


"Why didn't you ask rather than going on the attack? You admitted you
can't back up your boat and you have your poor wife help you push it.
Any reasonable person would say you should SFTU."


Hey Ditzy...what does SFTU mean?
SNERK! What a jackass!


Suck farts then upchuck. ;-)

Guess I should have read this first!
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

Hey John...
 

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 9:01:19 AM UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Ditzy Dan...the CounterMan babbles......


"Why didn't you ask rather than going on the attack? *You admitted you
can't back up your boat and you have your poor wife help you push it. *
Any reasonable person would say you should SFTU."


Hey Ditzy...what does SFTU mean?
SNERK! What a jackass!

Perhaps it was a typo of the acronym 'STFU', which means 'Shut the **** up'.

For example, someone the other day posted this: "Air Canada could have used your
'flying skills' early Sunday morning when a passenger plant touched down about 1100
feet short on the main Halifax runway..."

One might ask, "What is a 'passenger plant' and did the 'plant' to which you refer
land 'on' the runway, as you state, or '1100 feet short' of the runway."

No one commented on your typos, because they were being nice. Give it a shot
sometime.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

~SNERK~!!

Hey John...
 

On 4/1/15 9:01 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Ditzy Dan...the CounterMan babbles......


"Why didn't you ask rather than going on the attack? You admitted you
can't back up your boat and you have your poor wife help you push it.
Any reasonable person would say you should SFTU."


Hey Ditzy...what does SFTU mean?
SNERK! What a jackass!

Perhaps it was a typo of the acronym 'STFU', which means 'Shut the **** up'.

For example, someone the other day posted this: "Air Canada could have used your
'flying skills' early Sunday morning when a passenger plant touched down about 1100
feet short on the main Halifax runway..."

One might ask, "What is a 'passenger plant' and did the 'plant' to which you refer
land 'on' the runway, as you state, or '1100 feet short' of the runway."

No one commented on your typos, because they were being nice. Give it a shot
sometime.



Perhaps, Colonel Klink, if you were really interested in a better tone
here and "nice," you would stop making the sort of comment you did in
this case and just let what you find offensive pass. I've gone one
better, of course, and have filtered out most of the occupants of the
Konservative Klown Kar and, as a result, don't even see their offensive
dog poop droppings in this news group. Therefore, I don't usually
comment on the stench they create and maintain.

Just a suggestion.

Hey John...
 

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:40:10 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 4/1/15 9:01 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Ditzy Dan...the CounterMan babbles......


"Why didn't you ask rather than going on the attack? You admitted you
can't back up your boat and you have your poor wife help you push it.
Any reasonable person would say you should SFTU."


Hey Ditzy...what does SFTU mean?
SNERK! What a jackass!

Perhaps it was a typo of the acronym 'STFU', which means 'Shut the **** up'.

For example, someone the other day posted this: "Air Canada could have used your
'flying skills' early Sunday morning when a passenger plant touched down about 1100
feet short on the main Halifax runway..."

One might ask, "What is a 'passenger plant' and did the 'plant' to which you refer
land 'on' the runway, as you state, or '1100 feet short' of the runway."

No one commented on your typos, because they were being nice. Give it a shot
sometime.



Perhaps, Colonel Klink, if you were really interested in a better tone
here and "nice," you would stop making the sort of comment you did in
this case and just let what you find offensive pass.

Just a suggestion.

You could also take your own advice and not comment as well, eh?

Just a suggestion.

Hey John...
 

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Perhaps, Colonel Klink, if you were really interested in a better tone
here and "nice," you would stop making the sort of comment you did in
this case and just let what you find offensive pass.

Just a suggestion.

You could also take your own advice and not comment as well, eh?

Just a suggestion.

===

And a good suggestion it is. Harry is totally convinced however that
his **** doesn't stink.

Hey John...
 

On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:46:50 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Perhaps, Colonel Klink, if you were really interested in a better tone
here and "nice," you would stop making the sort of comment you did in
this case and just let what you find offensive pass.

Just a suggestion.

You could also take your own advice and not comment as well, eh?

Just a suggestion.

===

And a good suggestion it is. Harry is totally convinced however that
his **** doesn't stink.

Indeed.
--

Guns don't cause problems.
Gun owner behavior causes problems.

Hey John...
 

On 4/1/15 4:30 PM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 15:46:50 -0400, Wayne.B wrote:

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:12:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Perhaps, Colonel Klink, if you were really interested in a better tone
here and "nice," you would stop making the sort of comment you did in
this case and just let what you find offensive pass.

Just a suggestion.

You could also take your own advice and not comment as well, eh?

Just a suggestion.

===

And a good suggestion it is. Harry is totally convinced however that
his **** doesn't stink.

Indeed.




Once again, I am not the one whining about the behavior exhibited here.
I have no expectations you Konservative Klown Kar boys will behave
decently. I simply point out the hypocrisy. You and several others on
your side of the fence frequently complain about the tone in here,
conveniently forgetting that you guys are by far in the majority here
and are responsible for most of the insulting and name calling. Ironic,
eh? If you really want a more decent tone here (which I doubt), then the
ball is in your court. Set the example of the behavior you say you'd
like in here, and get your buddies to follow your example. See what
happens. Playing newsgroup sheriff, as you often do, when you are one of
the prime violators only makes you appear sillier than you are.

Hey John...
 

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 8:16:41 AM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Ditzy Dan spews...

"You beat me to it. *I should have read ahead... "

No....you should STFU and quit embarrassing yourself.

Like you do, DICKLICKER??

Hey John...
 

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 2:40:10 PM UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 4/1/15 9:01 AM, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 05:13:38 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

Ditzy Dan...the CounterMan babbles......


"Why didn't you ask rather than going on the attack? You admitted you
can't back up your boat and you have your poor wife help you push it.
Any reasonable person would say you should SFTU."


Hey Ditzy...what does SFTU mean?
SNERK! What a jackass!

Perhaps it was a typo of the acronym 'STFU', which means 'Shut the **** up'.

For example, someone the other day posted this: "Air Canada could have used your
'flying skills' early Sunday morning when a passenger plant touched down about 1100
feet short on the main Halifax runway..."

One might ask, "What is a 'passenger plant' and did the 'plant' to which you refer
land 'on' the runway, as you state, or '1100 feet short' of the runway."

No one commented on your typos, because they were being nice. Give it a shot
sometime.



Perhaps, Colonel Klink, if you were really interested in a better tone
here and "nice," you would stop making the sort of comment you did in
this case and just let what you find offensive pass.

Just a suggestion.

Look who the ****s talking, ****.

Hey John...
 

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 3:47:16 PM UTC-4, Wayne. B wrote:

And a good suggestion it is. Harry is totally convinced however that
his **** doesn't stink.

yet dicklicker whites breath smells of krauses smegma.