|
Yo John!
On 3/12/2015 12:29 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/12/15 12:22 PM, John H. wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:42:22 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/12/2015 11:08 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I've been to the range twice this month so far. === Don't they have any membership standards? We bounce one or two asshats every year from our group. It would be difficult to measure Harry by standards used to judge normal men. Harry's already told us how much better than the cops he shoots. Wow! Wayne, FlaJim, and Col. Klink...Three Right-Wing Turds on a Log. :) Don't feel so outnumbered and over powered. Come back with something smart. Take your time, we'll wait. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Yo John!
DitzyDan spews...
"Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. *A stainless S&W .500 magnum. *I ordered the 6.5" barrel." Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy. That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for. How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary? |
Yo John!
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:38:25 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:
DitzyDan spews... "Gun #32 is on it's way to my dealer. *A stainless S&W .500 magnum. *I ordered the 6.5" barrel." Is that 32 guns you own, Ditzy. That sure must be some shortcoming you're over compensating for. How do y'all do it on a counterman's salary? Don, you are so far out in left field that I doubt you could see the catcher even if it were Harry. And, have you considered the possibility that the #32 refers only to revolvers? Perhaps From where did you get the 'counterman' nonsense? You should really consider thinking before you post. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner *behavior* causes problems. |
Yo John!
|
Yo John!
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:33:32 -0400, John H. wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for lunch. You disagree, eh? Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get back down in far less than a second. A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup shots'. [NB: Harry does not fall into that category.] If you are going to buy commercial ammo, you won't be able to afford to shoot this a lot. It looks like the ammo is $2 a round. OTOH the bullets are about a quarter each in quantity of 500 (at Natchez) so the reloaders really make out. Powder and primers add another nickel or so. $2 will buy about six quality FMJ rounds in .357 Mag. But of course we don't have griz like they do in SE Florida 😃 -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Yo John!
On 3/12/2015 5:03 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:33:32 -0400, John H. wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for lunch. You disagree, eh? Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get back down in far less than a second. A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup shots'. [NB: Harry does not fall into that category.] If you are going to buy commercial ammo, you won't be able to afford to shoot this a lot. It looks like the ammo is $2 a round. OTOH the bullets are about a quarter each in quantity of 500 (at Natchez) so the reloaders really make out. Powder and primers add another nickel or so. $2 will buy about six quality FMJ rounds in .357 Mag. But of course we don't have griz like they do in SE Florida 😃 Griz in Florida? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
Yo John!
On 3/12/15 2:33 PM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:20:56 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:55:12 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: My point about the .500 S&W is perfectly valid. Quick followup shots are a bitch, and if you miss the bear, the bear is going to have you for lunch. You disagree, eh? Define "quick". I am sure a guy who shoots one regularly could get back down in far less than a second. A guy who shoots one regularly probably wouldn't need to worry about 'quick followup shots'. [NB: Harry does not fall into that category.] Not to worry, Colonel Klink: with your list of ailments, surgeries, and vision problems, you probably should stick to your Daisy BB rifle. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Yo John!
|
Yo John!
On 3/12/15 2:16 PM, John H. wrote:
You should really consider thinking before you post. I'd suggest you follow your own advice, but, then, there is no evidence here you are capable of doing so, eh, Colonel Klink? -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com