Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:32:55 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: "The clear assertion of the judges is that there is no legitimate health reason to be asking about gun ownership." Well, is there? === I think Harry is very conflicted about his alleged gun ownership. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:48:06 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/9/15 10:40 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 7:14:54 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/9/15 9:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. Harry, I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've read from you all day. Are Dr.'s to be firearms instructors? Seriously. Is yours? Doctors are qualified to ask whether a household has firearms and whether they are locked up and kept away from children. My wife sometimes asks that question of patients who are out of control and their family members and advises the family members to remove the firearms from the household. -- Proud to be a Liberal. OK the where'd you come up with this foolishness? " In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. " Something you dream would be true? It has been in the news for several years relating to Florida. "In Florida, in 2011, a law was signed that made it illegal for doctors to ask patients if they owned a gun. If doctors violate this law, they can be disciplined, leading to fines, citations and even a loss of their license. A lower court struck down the law in 2012. But last week, a panel of judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld it. In their ruling, the judges declared that the law regulates physician conduct “to protect patient privacy and curtail abuses of the physician-patient relationship.” The clear assertion of the judges is that there is no legitimate health reason to be asking about gun ownership." http://tinyurl.com/mt7tyka An unnecessary invasion of privacy. -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner *behavior* causes problems. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/9/2015 10:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/9/15 9:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. Harry, I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've read from you all day. Are Dr.'s to be firearms instructors? Seriously. Is yours? Doctors are qualified to ask whether a household has firearms and whether they are locked up and kept away from children. My wife sometimes asks that question of patients who are out of control and their family members and advises the family members to remove the firearms from the household. Your wife is not a doctor, dummy. She's a social worker with a PHD. Doctors have patients. Social workers have clients. Get it? -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:28:15 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote:
On 3/9/2015 10:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/9/15 9:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. Harry, I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've read from you all day. Are Dr.'s to be firearms instructors? Seriously. Is yours? Doctors are qualified to ask whether a household has firearms and whether they are locked up and kept away from children. My wife sometimes asks that question of patients who are out of control and their family members and advises the family members to remove the firearms from the household. Your wife is not a doctor, dummy. She's a social worker with a PHD. Doctors have patients. Social workers have clients. Get it? Yeah, but what if she has two or three PhD's? -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner *behavior* causes problems. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/10/2015 8:37 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:28:15 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/9/2015 10:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/9/15 9:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. Harry, I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've read from you all day. Are Dr.'s to be firearms instructors? Seriously. Is yours? Doctors are qualified to ask whether a household has firearms and whether they are locked up and kept away from children. My wife sometimes asks that question of patients who are out of control and their family members and advises the family members to remove the firearms from the household. Your wife is not a doctor, dummy. She's a social worker with a PHD. Doctors have patients. Social workers have clients. Get it? Yeah, but what if she has two or three PhD's? Hell, I am "qualified" to ask anyone I know if they have guns at home and I don't have a PhD. Doesn't mean I have a lawful right to expect an answer. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/10/15 10:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 3/10/2015 8:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:28:15 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/9/2015 10:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/9/15 9:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. Harry, I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've read from you all day. Are Dr.'s to be firearms instructors? Seriously. Is yours? Doctors are qualified to ask whether a household has firearms and whether they are locked up and kept away from children. My wife sometimes asks that question of patients who are out of control and their family members and advises the family members to remove the firearms from the household. Your wife is not a doctor, dummy. She's a social worker with a PHD. Doctors have patients. Social workers have clients. Get it? Yeah, but what if she has two or three PhD's? Hell, I am "qualified" to ask anyone I know if they have guns at home and I don't have a PhD. Doesn't mean I have a lawful right to expect an answer. I don't recall reading that an "answer" to that question or others on other subjects were lawfully required of patients. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:40:13 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 3/10/2015 8:37 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:28:15 -0400, Justan Olphart wrote: On 3/9/2015 10:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 3/9/15 9:53 PM, Tim wrote: On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 2:51:50 PM UTC-7, Keyser Söze wrote: In a further assault on sanity, your state's backwards Republican government has forbidden medical personnel from discussing firearms safety with their patients. Harry, I think that's the most ridiculous thing I've read from you all day. Are Dr.'s to be firearms instructors? Seriously. Is yours? Doctors are qualified to ask whether a household has firearms and whether they are locked up and kept away from children. My wife sometimes asks that question of patients who are out of control and their family members and advises the family members to remove the firearms from the household. Your wife is not a doctor, dummy. She's a social worker with a PHD. Doctors have patients. Social workers have clients. Get it? Yeah, but what if she has two or three PhD's? Hell, I am "qualified" to ask anyone I know if they have guns at home and I don't have a PhD. Doesn't mean I have a lawful right to expect an answer. Yeah, but if the person says it's none of your business, that person doesn't have to worry about you shoving a big finger up his butt! -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner *behavior* causes problems. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/10/15 10:49 AM, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:40:13 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Hell, I am "qualified" to ask anyone I know if they have guns at home and I don't have a PhD. Doesn't mean I have a lawful right to expect an answer. Yeah, but if the person says it's none of your business, that person doesn't have to worry about you shoving a big finger up his butt! You should be thankful, because it'll be the only sexual contact you get. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:52:40 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 3/10/15 10:49 AM, John H. wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:40:13 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: Hell, I am "qualified" to ask anyone I know if they have guns at home and I don't have a PhD. Doesn't mean I have a lawful right to expect an answer. Yeah, but if the person says it's none of your business, that person doesn't have to worry about you shoving a big finger up his butt! You should be thankful, because it'll be the only sexual contact you get. To you that is 'sexual contact' eh? -- Guns don't cause problems. Gun owner *behavior* causes problems. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat runs ot a high speeds | General | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gepkox | General | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ wypbe | Cruising | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ wypbe | Boat Building | |||
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ wypbe | Cruising |