On 2/12/15 9:51 AM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:29:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/12/15 8:24 AM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:08:47 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/owo4qog

Are you showing us self portraits?


You are *so* suited for the right-wing pig pen rec.boats has become.
Perhaps you might be named the official rec.boats mascot. Seriously,
John, have you ever in your long life had an original, clever, written
thought? Ever?

****ed off, eh?

Harry, we can't all be original, clever, thoughtful liars such as yourself.

Besides, someone here referred to my linguistics as 'cunning'. That's much more of a
compliment than *any* of your lies have received. Wouldn't you agree?


They probably were referring to you boiling up a pot of linguini,
because "cunning" in linguistics you ain't.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:17:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/12/15 11:00 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 5:08:49 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/owo4qog
--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Harry, you bring up this stuff, just to have it thrown back at you. I think you like it.


Scott Walker considers himself one of the leading contenders for the GOP
2016 nomination. It's significant to point out he's ball-less and
brain-less, and like many GOP wannabes, is playing to the bible-thumpers
in his party by not taking a stand on this issue.

You mean you posted something other than 'selfies'?
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:34:14 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/12/15 9:51 AM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:29:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/12/15 8:24 AM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:08:47 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/owo4qog

Are you showing us self portraits?


You are *so* suited for the right-wing pig pen rec.boats has become.
Perhaps you might be named the official rec.boats mascot. Seriously,
John, have you ever in your long life had an original, clever, written
thought? Ever?

****ed off, eh?

Harry, we can't all be original, clever, thoughtful liars such as yourself.

Besides, someone here referred to my linguistics as 'cunning'. That's much more of a
compliment than *any* of your lies have received. Wouldn't you agree?


They probably were referring to you boiling up a pot of linguini,
because "cunning" in linguistics you ain't.

The author has only my linguistics herein from which to make judgment. I can be much
more general about you, 'cause I've actually *met* you.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:22:59 -0500, wrote:

They are ALL trying to tip toe the line between science and the 40% of
the population that will not accept that we are "descended from
monkeys".

===

That whole "descended from monkeys" nonsense is part of the problem
that people have with evolution, and it's actually a misrepresentation
of what is currently believed. Monkeys, apes, etc., developed along a
different but closely related branch. We're not even descended from
neandrathals although there was apparently some inter breeding at
times.

On 2/12/2015 11:17 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/15 11:00 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 5:08:49 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/owo4qog
--
Proud to be a Liberal.

Harry, you bring up this stuff, just to have it thrown back at you. I
think you like it.


Scott Walker considers himself one of the leading contenders for the GOP
2016 nomination. It's significant to point out he's ball-less and
brain-less, and like many GOP wannabes, is playing to the bible-thumpers
in his party by not taking a stand on this issue.



I don't think it's anyone's business what an individual's religious
beliefs are as long as they do not interfere with job performance
and adherence to law.

Rachael has become a somewhat of a yellow journalist. It's too bad
because she's smart and has better to offer. Her show is become a video
version of the National Examiner .

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:08:51 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

For Christ's sake. It's only the Republicans that have to worry about
that bull****. You won't find a Democrat that can't answer that
question directly. And only the ignorant would equate evolution with
"descended from monkeys." There's nothing incompatible with evolution
and belief in a God.
It's strictly a Republican problem.

===

It's not really a republican problem either except to the extent that
the GOP has been co-opted by the ultra religious right. There are
plenty of middle-of-the road republicans (and conservatives) who don't
want any part of that nonsense.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:55:34 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:05:49 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:22:59 -0500, wrote:

They are ALL trying to tip toe the line between science and the 40% of
the population that will not accept that we are "descended from
monkeys".

===

That whole "descended from monkeys" nonsense is part of the problem
that people have with evolution, and it's actually a misrepresentation
of what is currently believed. Monkeys, apes, etc., developed along a
different but closely related branch. We're not even descended from
neandrathals although there was apparently some inter breeding at
times.

I know but it is the metaphor evolution is fighting.

Personally I have a hard time understanding how anyone can deny
evolution, we see it every year with the flu virus but people still
get hung up on the monkey thing.

===

The development of antibiotic resistant bacteria and insecticide
resistant mosquitos are also classic examples of evolution in action.
It's really to bad that so many religious leaders end up finding
themselves on the wrong side of scientific evidence. It would be just
as easy to turn the whole thing around and accept it as a miracle.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:32:43 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

I don't want a guy who thinks the earth is flat or that evolution is a
hoax as President.

===

He very intentionally did not say what he believes because it's good
politics not to. The question was also irrelevant to the context of
the interview and didn't really deserve an answer. I know nothing
about the guy or his politics but I'd be really surprised if he thinks
that evolution is a hoax.

In article ,
says...


I believe there are high office Democrats who believe the same way,, but they'll probably never be asked about it.

I don't.
Anybody who believes evolution is a hoax would be laughed out of the
Democratic Party, and rightly so.
And not answering the question would probably result in the same.
It wouldn't surprise me if that insane idea has been "test marketed" to
the Republican base. IMO, they are insane.
Even the nominal Republicans here are defending Walker with bull****
about "test marketing."

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:23:46 -0600, Boating All Out wrote:

In article ,
says...


I believe there are high office Democrats who believe the same way,, but they'll probably never be asked about it.

I don't.
Anybody who believes evolution is a hoax would be laughed out of the
Democratic Party, and rightly so.
And not answering the question would probably result in the same.
It wouldn't surprise me if that insane idea has been "test marketed" to
the Republican base. IMO, they are insane.
Even the nominal Republicans here are defending Walker with bull****
about "test marketing."

Yeah but - you're the one who proclaimed ISIS to be nothing more than some thugs.
Your credibility is right up there with Krause's.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.