On 2/7/15 4:49 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/chris-kyles-killer-complains-american-sniper-films-success-will-make-fair-trial-impossible/

Today the talking heads were saying that the killer would find a fair trial rough
anywhere in the country.

But I'm thinking they should just try to find some Krause and Pelosi fans. How about
San Francisco? That should be liberal enough.


Obviously, John, behaving reasonably in here really is difficult for you.

Didn't I read that the fellow who shot the sniper had serious mental
health issues? Even in the article you referenced?

"Eddie Ray Routh’s struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
is what brought together with Kyle and Littlefield, who were reportedly
on the remote shooting range in order to help him. However, at some
point during their outing, Routh told his sister and brother-in-law that
“he couldn’t trust [Kyle and Littlefield] so he killed them before they
could kill him.”

"Routh — a former Marine sharpshooter — had been in and out of the Green
Oaks Psychiatric Hospital at least twice in the five months prior to the
killings for threatening to kill himself and members of his family."

A bit of paranoid schizophrenia, eh?

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:06:13 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 4:49 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/chris-kyles-killer-complains-american-sniper-films-success-will-make-fair-trial-impossible/

Today the talking heads were saying that the killer would find a fair trial rough
anywhere in the country.

But I'm thinking they should just try to find some Krause and Pelosi fans. How about
San Francisco? That should be liberal enough.


Obviously, John, behaving reasonably in here really is difficult for you.

Didn't I read that the fellow who shot the sniper had serious mental
health issues? Even in the article you referenced?

"Eddie Ray Routh’s struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
is what brought together with Kyle and Littlefield, who were reportedly
on the remote shooting range in order to help him. However, at some
point during their outing, Routh told his sister and brother-in-law that
“he couldn’t trust [Kyle and Littlefield] so he killed them before they
could kill him.”

"Routh — a former Marine sharpshooter — had been in and out of the Green
Oaks Psychiatric Hospital at least twice in the five months prior to the
killings for threatening to kill himself and members of his family."

A bit of paranoid schizophrenia, eh?

What was unreasonable about my suggestion?
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On 2/7/15 5:26 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:06:13 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 2/7/15 4:49 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/chris-kyles-killer-complains-american-sniper-films-success-will-make-fair-trial-impossible/

Today the talking heads were saying that the killer would find a fair trial rough
anywhere in the country.

But I'm thinking they should just try to find some Krause and Pelosi fans. How about
San Francisco? That should be liberal enough.


Obviously, John, behaving reasonably in here really is difficult for you.

Didn't I read that the fellow who shot the sniper had serious mental
health issues? Even in the article you referenced?

"Eddie Ray Routh’s struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
is what brought together with Kyle and Littlefield, who were reportedly
on the remote shooting range in order to help him. However, at some
point during their outing, Routh told his sister and brother-in-law that
“he couldn’t trust [Kyle and Littlefield] so he killed them before they
could kill him.”

"Routh — a former Marine sharpshooter — had been in and out of the Green
Oaks Psychiatric Hospital at least twice in the five months prior to the
killings for threatening to kill himself and members of his family."

A bit of paranoid schizophrenia, eh?

What was unreasonable about my suggestion?


If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/8/2015 7:49 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

Only if they've committed a capital crime. I love your reveals. They say
so much about who and what you are, Herr Krause.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

On 2/8/15 11:00 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:49:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

Why not? Can you say any murderer is actually sane?

I understand you are against the death penalty in all circumstances
but the criminally insane should be at the front of the line. Cull the
herd, hopefully before they can reproduce. Darwin supports my position
on this.


Fortunately, most civilized people disagree.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/8/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/8/15 11:00 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:49:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

Why not? Can you say any murderer is actually sane?

I understand you are against the death penalty in all circumstances
but the criminally insane should be at the front of the line. Cull the
herd, hopefully before they can reproduce. Darwin supports my position
on this.


Fortunately, most civilized people disagree.



The test is if the person committing the crime has the mental capacity
to know it's a crime ... or wrong.

On 2/8/15 12:06 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/8/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/8/15 11:00 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:49:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at
all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

Why not? Can you say any murderer is actually sane?

I understand you are against the death penalty in all circumstances
but the criminally insane should be at the front of the line. Cull the
herd, hopefully before they can reproduce. Darwin supports my position
on this.


Fortunately, most civilized people disagree.



The test is if the person committing the crime has the mental capacity
to know it's a crime ... or wrong.



Indeed, our criminal justice system is based upon revenge and
bloodthirstyness, with, usually, racism tossed in for good measure.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/8/2015 2:33 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:06:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/8/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/8/15 11:00 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:49:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

Why not? Can you say any murderer is actually sane?

I understand you are against the death penalty in all circumstances
but the criminally insane should be at the front of the line. Cull the
herd, hopefully before they can reproduce. Darwin supports my position
on this.


Fortunately, most civilized people disagree.



The test is if the person committing the crime has the mental capacity
to know it's a crime ... or wrong.

OK I'll play. If someone is so mentally damaged that they do not think
killing another person is a crime, why would we want them on the
planet with us? We certainly do not want them influencing anyone else
behavioral or genetically.




So, you are suggesting "murder" is genetic?

On 2/8/2015 2:33 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:06:42 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 2/8/2015 11:51 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/8/15 11:00 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:49:33 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/7/15 11:58 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:30:16 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

If he's as mentally ill as it sounds, he shouldn't be tried at all. He
should be committed.

The chance of being "cured" in an asylum is about as good as being
rehabilitated in prison.
Put him in the chair and tell him it's a ride.


How very revealing...execute the mentally ill.

Why not? Can you say any murderer is actually sane?

I understand you are against the death penalty in all circumstances
but the criminally insane should be at the front of the line. Cull the
herd, hopefully before they can reproduce. Darwin supports my position
on this.


Fortunately, most civilized people disagree.



The test is if the person committing the crime has the mental capacity
to know it's a crime ... or wrong.

OK I'll play. If someone is so mentally damaged that they do not think
killing another person is a crime, why would we want them on the
planet with us? We certainly do not want them influencing anyone else
behavioral or genetically.

That logic suggests anyone with a serious physical disability and is
dependent on others, including the government, for their
welfare should also be "eliminated". Don't need that burden, huh?

BTW ... what makes you think mental illness is hereditary?