Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/1/15 7:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/1/2015 6:48 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 3:59:07 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. -- Proud to be a Liberal. I agree with Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government... The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed" Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) Tim, that's a wonderful historical statement, true for it's time. It's more of a tradition now though. I don't care how many guns are privately owned, there's no way they could be used to fend off the US military if our government somehow decided to become "tyrannical". Heck, they can't agree on how many sugars to put in a coffee. In most reasonably populated counties, the gun guys couldn't fend off the sheriff's department. Even in my "heavily gun controlled state," the Staties aren't interested with my plan to build a semi-auto rifle in a caliber heavier than .223/5.56. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hal Turner pulls no punches! (most refreshing!) | General | |||
ahh refreshing | ASA |