Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,006
Default Very Refreshing

On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 10:38:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 10:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM,
wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting
for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those
who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation.
You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a
time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable.



Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would
stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to
take away his guns.

I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths
here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I
stop and talk to them for grins every few years.


===

As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and
figuratively.


Hey, you want to give up your life to protect your guns, you go right
ahead. I'll watch you do it on the evening news. Me, I'd rather go to
the beach. Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes,
or RV'ing.


Do you wear your black socks on the beach?

  #68   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Very Refreshing

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 10:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/31/15 11:47 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 2:32 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/30/15 12:52 PM,
wrote:

Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression,
backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as
the Kochs are.

No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you.

I support most of Bloomberg's
efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession,

One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs.


So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist,
not a crazed NRA gun nutsie.

So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was
just compensation?


I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law
enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in
order to retain possession of his firearms.

I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby
for me.

I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your
stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our
forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen.


Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law
enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't
on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your
survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with
me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat.

As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting
for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those
who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation.
You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a
time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable.



Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would
stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to
take away his guns.

I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths
here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I
stop and talk to them for grins every few years.


===

As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and
figuratively.


Hey, you want to give up your life to protect your guns, you go right
ahead. I'll watch you do it on the evening news. Me, I'd rather go to the
beach. Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing.



I think it is the complete rights we are guaranteed via our constitution
that most are worried about losing.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hal Turner pulls no punches! (most refreshing!) greg3347 General 2 September 18th 07 04:30 AM
ahh refreshing Joe ASA 0 April 9th 05 07:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017