|
Very Refreshing
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:28:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? === Not unlike at all. Tell you what, let's go seize some land in suburban Maryland and give it back to the native Americans who once lived there. They could build a casino on your property and hire you on as a tax accountant. PS, native Americans were very fond of killing small animals and eating them for dinner. |
Very Refreshing
On 1/31/2015 6:02 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 17:21:24 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote: On 1/31/2015 5:13 PM, Mucho Loco wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. === Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"? This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern liberals. I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so we are sure to tape it on the TV news. Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to remain under the thumb of the Crown. === Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of this great country may have been radical for their time, they were not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed. 1. Yup, funny. 2. Not likely. 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to help the oppressed? Yeah, I thought so. Harry, tooting your own horn is unmannerly. Were the owls overlooking those events? He wouldn't get shot at so often if he didn't hang out with thieves, thugs, union bosses, and other low life. I've never heard anyone, even my two cop brothers and fellow soldiers, talk about 'the times they've been shot at'. Now we're up to three times. He might have heard gunshots, or even firecrackers.... but hey, it's harry so we know it's gonna' be grand... |
Very Refreshing
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... |
Very Refreshing
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:50:37 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... === Heh. Lone Ranger to Tonto: We in big trouble. Tonto: We, white man? |
Very Refreshing
On 1/31/2015 7:41 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/31/2015 5:01 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 4:41 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:20:12 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 3:51 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. === Have you ever heard the saying "Live Free or Die"? This country ws not founded by a bunch of pansy assed eastern liberals. I'll be delighted for you to take on federal authorities with your Mosin Nagent you apparently can't shoot straight and your Ruger Mark III with the dimpled barrel. Please let us know when you are going to do this, so we are sure to tape it on the TV news. Oh...the 18th Century founding fathers? They were eastern and pretty radical and liberal. The *conservative* response would have been to remain under the thumb of the Crown. === Funny stuff Harry. It's a lot more likely that the Feds will be coming after you than after me. And although the founding fathers of this great country may have been radical for their time, they were not afraid of standing up to authority when oppressed. 1. Yup, funny. 2. Not likely. 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. How many times have you been shot at while standing up to authority to help the oppressed? Yeah, I thought so. === I was shot at while in the service of my country but as a draft dodger you wouldn't understand that. Oh snap... as they say. And really harry, nobody believes any of those harrytales of heroics anyway. Now if you told us you dove in a ditch and **** your shorts, we might believe you... I will freely admit the first time a guy laid a double barrel shotgun out the window of his ford, I jumped in a ditch... Woulda' been a bad decision if the guy actually pulled the trigger. I was on top of Green Mountain east of Huntsville Alabama in the heart of moonshine country, walking down a very lonely road, after dark and made the locals nervous. He held me at gunpoint till my boss came and confirmed I was just a 18 year old yankee kid, selling door to door... Story gets funnier really. I didn't know what to do so I opened up my flip board, and started pitching the guy the product I was selling at the time... the third time I had a gun in my face it was attached to a police officer and all I remember is trying to spread my fingers as far apart as possible and get my hands as far from my body as possible so he could see I was not armed.. Another time I got pulled over working at a garage and jumped out of the car in my full leathers and started reaching into a duffle bag I had in the back of the car to show him the dealer plate which I had neglected to put on the back of the car for the short trip. Of course he thought I was reaching for a gun, when it was all over I think he was more shook up than I was.... |
Very Refreshing
On 1/31/2015 7:50 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... lol |
Very Refreshing
On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) |
Very Refreshing
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:16:24 PM UTC-8, Wayne. B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) yeah. woosh... |
Very Refreshing
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 5:15:19 PM UTC-8, KC wrote:
On 1/31/2015 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... lol I thought the same, Scott... |
Very Refreshing
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:28:39 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? === Not unlike at all. Tell you what, let's go seize some land in suburban Maryland and give it back to the native Americans who once lived there. They could build a casino on your property and hire you on as a tax accountant. PS, native Americans were very fond of killing small animals and eating them for dinner. They also were fond of fighting other tribes also |
Very Refreshing
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 7:41:44 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:
Oh snap... as they say. And really harry, nobody believes any of those harrytales of heroics anyway. Now if you told us you dove in a ditch and **** your shorts, we might believe you... PAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THANKS FOR THE LAUGH !!!!! |
Very Refreshing
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 7:43:46 PM UTC-5, Wayne. B wrote:
Not unlike at all. Tell you what, let's go seize some land in suburban Maryland and give it back to the native Americans who once lived there. They could build a casino on your property and hire you on as a tax accountant. They DON'T need an embezzler, and tax cheat artist.... |
Very Refreshing
On 1/31/15 10:18 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:16:24 PM UTC-8, Wayne. B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) yeah. woosh... I had no idea you were a Native American, Tim. Are you the last of the Mohicans? -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 09:57:16 UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/31/15 10:18 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:16:24 PM UTC-8, Wayne. B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) yeah. woosh... I had no idea you were a Native American, Tim. Are you the last of the Mohicans? -- Proud to be a Liberal. I may be wrong but I believe Tim and Cher have something in common....besides good looks. ;-) |
Very Refreshing
On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation. You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable. Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to take away his guns. I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I stop and talk to them for grins every few years. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 9:00 AM, True North wrote:
On Sunday, 1 February 2015 09:57:16 UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 10:18 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:16:24 PM UTC-8, Wayne. B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) yeah. woosh... I had no idea you were a Native American, Tim. Are you the last of the Mohicans? -- Proud to be a Liberal. I may be wrong but I believe Tim and Cher have something in common....besides good looks. ;-) Long hair? Cher is of Armenian ancestry, with a splash of Cherokee. My wife also has a splash of Cherokee in her ancestry. Maybe Cher, Tim, and my wife are related. :) -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation. You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable. Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to take away his guns. I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I stop and talk to them for grins every few years. === As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and figuratively. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 10:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation. You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable. Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to take away his guns. I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I stop and talk to them for grins every few years. === As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and figuratively. Hey, you want to give up your life to protect your guns, you go right ahead. I'll watch you do it on the evening news. Me, I'd rather go to the beach. Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 10:38:48 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 10:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation. You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable. Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to take away his guns. I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I stop and talk to them for grins every few years. === As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and figuratively. Hey, you want to give up your life to protect your guns, you go right ahead. I'll watch you do it on the evening news. Me, I'd rather go to the beach. Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing. Do you wear your black socks on the beach? |
Very Refreshing
|
Very Refreshing
|
Very Refreshing
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... |
Very Refreshing
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:47:19 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... === Basically Harry is a dysfuctional attention seeker who likes to keep stirring the pot. Apparently he didn't get enough attention as a child so he continues to act like a three year old frozen in time. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 1:52 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:47:19 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... === Basically Harry is a dysfuctional attention seeker who likes to keep stirring the pot. Apparently he didn't get enough attention as a child so he continues to act like a three year old frozen in time. Ooooooh. :) -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 10:29 AM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 09:05:55 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:49 PM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 14:04:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 11:47 AM, wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:59:05 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. I forgot, you are a democrat. If the government wants to take your stuff, you are more than happy to just give it to them. If our forefathers were like you, you would still be curtseying to the queen. Well, I'm not dumb enough to think I can stand off armed federal law enforcement officers. This isn't the 18th Century and the troops aren't on a supply or reinforcement chain 3000 miles long. I'll let your survivors and those of Wayne let me know what happened. Has to do with me not being an idiot, not with me being a Democrat. As usual you totally missed the point. We protect our rights by voting for people who do not want to take them away and getting rid of those who do ... so we are not in armed confrontation. You are more likely to just let your rights slip away, a little at a time, until you don't have the ones you consider valuable. Actually, I was responding to a post in which Wayne claimed he would stand his ground against law enforcement officials who were coming to take away his guns. I know the sort of people you'd like to vote for...they set up booths here near shopping centers to peddle libertarianism and birtherism. I stop and talk to them for grins every few years. === As opposed to Harry who would turn the other cheek both literally and figuratively. Hey, you want to give up your life to protect your guns, you go right ahead. I'll watch you do it on the evening news. Me, I'd rather go to the beach. Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing. I think it is the complete rights we are guaranteed via our constitution that most are worried about losing. |
Very Refreshing
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. Are you implying you've never vilified me or others about hobbies we've discussed? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
Very Refreshing
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. === Nice troll. Maybe you should go fishing with a bigger pole. |
Very Refreshing
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. === Nice troll. Maybe you should go fishing with a bigger pole. How sweet...another billet-doux from Wayne...should I expect flowers and chocolates from him? :) -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 2:40 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 11:38:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? It seems to be the only thing you do. Oh, I have other hobbies and interests. I just don't feel this is a friendly or even reasonable venue in which to discuss them. Too many flamers. :) -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 2:46 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. Are you implying you've never vilified me or others about hobbies we've discussed? I haven't "vilified" you or your hobbies for at least six weeks. If you want that sort of attention, you'll have to get it elsewhere. Sorry. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 16:40:28 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 2:46 PM, Mucho Loco wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. Are you implying you've never vilified me or others about hobbies we've discussed? I haven't "vilified" you or your hobbies for at least six weeks. If you want that sort of attention, you'll have to get it elsewhere. Sorry. Oh, well, see - you qualified your statement. Good on ya! -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 5:22 PM, Mucho Loco wrote:
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 16:40:28 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 2:46 PM, Mucho Loco wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. Are you implying you've never vilified me or others about hobbies we've discussed? I haven't "vilified" you or your hobbies for at least six weeks. If you want that sort of attention, you'll have to get it elsewhere. Sorry. Oh, well, see - you qualified your statement. Good on ya! No worries. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 17:24:56 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/1/15 5:22 PM, Mucho Loco wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 16:40:28 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 2:46 PM, Mucho Loco wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 14:25:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 1:47 PM, wrote: On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 11:38:59 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 2/1/15 11:31 AM, wrote: On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:38:46 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Guns are just a hobby for me, like golf, flying model planes, or RV'ing It seems to be an all consuming passion based on what you have posted here.. You are deep into gun nut territory. Because I have a few firearms and talk about them? You vilify others here who talk about their hobbies. If the shoe fits... Au contraire...I think golf, beer guzzling, RV'ing, bluegrass music, motorbike racing and telling everyone how big one's boat is are fine hobbies for the posters in this newsgroup. Are you implying you've never vilified me or others about hobbies we've discussed? I haven't "vilified" you or your hobbies for at least six weeks. If you want that sort of attention, you'll have to get it elsewhere. Sorry. Oh, well, see - you qualified your statement. Good on ya! No worries. Not worried. Absolutely amazed. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
Very Refreshing
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 5:57:16 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/31/15 10:18 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:16:24 PM UTC-8, Wayne. B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) yeah. woosh... I had no idea you were a Native American, Tim. Are you the last of the Mohicans? -- Proud to be a Liberal. Harry, that's not worth a reasonable reply. |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 6:23 PM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, February 1, 2015 at 5:57:16 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 10:18 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 6:16:24 PM UTC-8, Wayne. B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:55:23 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 7:50 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 4:28:42 PM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/31/15 6:03 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:49:29 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: 3. Three of the times I "stood up to authority" to help the oppressed resulted in me getting shot at, once while reporting on and participating in a black voter registration drive in the 1960s in the deep south, once while working for land reform in Central America, and once while helping organize oil rig supply ship crews. === Tell us more about this "land reform" in Central America. Does that mean that you were trying to take land away from whom it legally belonged and give it to someone else? That sounds like some kind of Robin Hood adventure to me although it's hard to imagine your fat ass in green tights and carrying a bow and arrow. Sounds like you were ahead of your time and should have waited for Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. His little adventure in socialism and seizing the assets of others isn't turning out very well though. Legally belonged? That's funny. In much of Central America, land was stolen from the indigent people by the oligarchy, aided by the military and sometimes aided by the good old USA, not unlike it was done in this country, eh? Tell me all about it, white eyes... So, you have no compassion for these abused indigent people? Sad. === Whoosh... :-) yeah. woosh... I had no idea you were a Native American, Tim. Are you the last of the Mohicans? -- Proud to be a Liberal. Harry, that's not worth a reasonable reply. Tim, I have no idea what your ethnic background might be, nor does it matter to me. I was wondering about your "white eyes" comment, though. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
Very Refreshing
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 3:59:07 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. -- Proud to be a Liberal. I agree with Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government... The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed" Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) |
Very Refreshing
On 2/1/15 6:48 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 3:59:07 AM UTC-8, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 2:32 PM, wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:10:06 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/30/15 12:52 PM, wrote: Bloomberg isn't spending his money to promote voter suppression, backwards, overly religious candidates, and regressive legislation as the Kochs are. No, he wants to take your assault rifles away from you. I support most of Bloomberg's efforts to tighten up firearms laws on illegal possession, One of them is eliminating civilian ownership of guns like your ARs. So? If it came to pass, I'd do what was required. I'm a gun hobbyist, not a crazed NRA gun nutsie. So you would just turn it in and take the $50 the government said was just compensation? I'm certainly *not* going to try to hold off federal or local law enforcement agents...I'll leave that to Wayne, who said here he would in order to retain possession of his firearms. I'd rather give them up and then go to the beach. Firearms are a hobby for me. -- Proud to be a Liberal. I agree with Thomas Jefferson "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in Government... The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed" Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) Good. You and Wayne hold off the police/military forces as long as you can while I enjoy the beach. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com