|
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: Poquito Loco wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030 Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ? I am surprised you would say something like that since your favorite gun these days is basically an M-16/AR-15 that killed so many of those Vietnamese you worry about so much ... and all those kids at Sandy Hook.the theater in Aurora and the DC sniper. Just a bit of fun using john's words -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
On 1/22/2015 5:18 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Poquito Loco wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...-ts=1421828030 Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. 😱 Awesome, thanks for sharing.... |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
On 1/22/2015 7:33 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote: On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ? === How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an AR-15? Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW. I don't own an M16. "The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine." Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious. The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic. It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I don't own a military rifle. Very little difference except for the select fire. And I do not think the modern M4 can fire full automatic. I think the auto part is 3 round burst. What's it matter... so harry has a toy that wasn't up to military use? Probably why he's so jealous. |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
On 1/22/2015 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 8:26:12 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 8:17 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 1/22/15 7:33 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote: On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ? === How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an AR-15? Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW. I don't own an M16. "The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine." Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious. The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic. It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I don't own a military rifle. Very little difference except for the select fire. And I do not think the modern M4 can fire full automatic. I think the auto part is 3 round burst. There's quite a bit of difference. Obtaining the necessary parts and converting an AR to full auto will make you eligible for a serious term in the slammer. The M4A1 is full auto. My AR has been customized some, with "accessories" you probably would not find on military issue rifles, but it is still a civilian semi-auto rifle. It's a big favorite of mass murderers. Nah...the news reports I've seen indicate the mass murderers go for the less expensive ARs... :) The one I have typically is not discounted much. It's this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj6X8HtwejU Really? Just like it? The very beginning of the video clearly shows the lower being stamped "Restricted for military... use only". Turns out you have a military rifle after all. :) Harrytales...geeze... |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
|
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:34:46 -0500, KC wrote:
Really? Just like it? The very beginning of the video clearly shows the lower being stamped "Restricted for military... use only". Turns out you have a military rifle after all. :) Harrytales...geeze... === It's all he's got. |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/22/15 7:33 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote: On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ? === How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an AR-15? Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW. I don't own an M16. "The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine." Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious. The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic. It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I don't own a military rifle. Very little difference except for the select fire. And I do not think the modern M4 can fire full automatic. I think the auto part is 3 round burst. There's quite a bit of difference. Obtaining the necessary parts and converting an AR to full auto will make you eligible for a serious term in the slammer. The M4A1 is full auto. My AR has been customized some, with "accessories" you probably would not find on military issue rifles, but it is still a civilian semi-auto rifle. Other than the trigger setup and the select fire switch, is almost the same. Different bolt and bolt face. But is very close. |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
wrote:
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 7:15:20 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote: On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ? == How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an AR-15? Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW. I don't own an M16. "The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine." Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious. The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic. It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I don't own a military rifle. The M16 is simply a military version of an AR15. The AR15 was designed to be, and is, a "military" rifle. Besides, it is entirely plausible, if not likely, that his rifle never even saw active battle use. It was most likely a training rifle that lived its life in an armory until being released for sale to the public. My conjecture is as valid as yours. :) M16 saw lots of battle use. |
Very nice P51 RC aircraft
On 1/22/2015 10:34 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:17:38 -0600, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 1/22/15 7:33 PM, Califbill wrote: Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 6:44 PM, wrote: On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 6:05:08 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/22/15 5:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On 22 Jan 2015 22:18:45 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote: Frankly, John, I find your touting of firearms actually used in wars and toys depicting actual military airplanes divisive and offensive. ? === How does that jibe with your ownership and glowing descriptions of an AR-15? Your new found sensitivity is touching BTW. I don't own an M16. "The AR-15 was designed to fit this exploration into a smaller caliber around 1958, which led to the development of the 5.56x45, commercially known as the .223Rem. ArmaLite sold the rights of the two designs to Colt in 1959. The USAF and US Army began seriously looking at the AR-15. The USAF adopted it shortly thereafter and it was made the primary infantry weapon for all of the branches of the US military a few years later in 1967, despite resistance by some in the higher ranks of the Army and USMC. Dubbed, the "M16" (US Military designation), it replaced the M14 and M1 Carbine." Your distinction is quite a bit more than dubious. The M16s the military issues can be fired on full automatic. My civilian AR-15 was built in 2014 and cannot be fired on full automatic. It is not the rifle the military issues. There are other differences. I don't own a military rifle. Very little difference except for the select fire. And I do not think the modern M4 can fire full automatic. I think the auto part is 3 round burst. There's quite a bit of difference. Obtaining the necessary parts and converting an AR to full auto will make you eligible for a serious term in the slammer. The M4A1 is full auto. My AR has been customized some, with "accessories" you probably would not find on military issue rifles, but it is still a civilian semi-auto rifle. It's a big favorite of mass murderers. === And cereal killers. Harry is addicted to the snap crackle and pop sounds of his, modified for the handicap, guns. -- Respectfully submitted by Justan Laugh of the day from Krause "I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here. I've been "born again" as a nice guy." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com