Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 13:59:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/25/15 1:39 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:42:51 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 12:24 PM, wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:08:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/25/15 10:46 AM, wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:45:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: it's not really financially worthwhile in Maryland to buy readily available pistols on line because the local FFLs add about $75 for their fee for filing the Maryland paperwork Gee I thought everyone was saying this was "a few dollars". The truth finally comes out ... as it always does eventually. The state's fees are small, but most FFLs are making money off the processing. A distinction without a difference to the buyer. Well, it encourages one to buy pistols from an in-state dealer, and then all you pay is the small state processing fee. When I bought my last pistol, it cost me $10 more in total than buying from the lowest cost out of state on line dealer. Sounds like Tim hadn't shown you the Slickguns site yet. I've not found a gun locally that I couldn't save a bundle on by buying online - except for the Mosin Nagant. But, that was before Tim clued me in. I'm aware of the "Slickguns" site. It shows a Ruger Mark III 512, the model I have, at $340. I paid $349.99 at a local dealer's, and no FFL fees or shipping. I did pay 6% sales tax. Oh, add to that in separate transactions about $100 for upgrade pieces and parts and $90 for barrel threading, cap, and relocating front sight. No FFLs involved. ![]() Gosh, which dealer was that, Harry? -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |