On 1/9/2015 9:36 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 09:32:31 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/9/15 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Why are you persisting with what you apparently believe is your
entitlement? I'm not afraid to answer the question...I simply choose not
to. Move on.

It's a rough question, I'll admit. Kinda goes right to your motives.

It's not necessary for him to acknowledge. The fifth amendment says so.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan