On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...

On 1/9/15 9:30 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have
been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the
country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit
snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just
because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate
question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal,
sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I
don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent
of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the
defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to
moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is
the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...


Thank you for helping prove my hypothesis...

On 1/9/2015 9:39 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 9:30 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have
been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the
country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit
snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just
because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate
question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal,
sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I
don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent
of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the
defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to
moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is
the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...


Thank you for helping prove my hypothesis...

You haven't proved anything. Nobody here but retard don and possibly
dick believes you...

On 1/9/2015 10:13 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 9:39 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/9/15 9:30 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze

wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have
been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the
country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit
snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just
because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate
question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal,
sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I
don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent
of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the
defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to
moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is
the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...


Thank you for helping prove my hypothesis...

You haven't proved anything. Nobody here but retard don and possibly
dick believes you...

Dick doesn't believe him.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 10:14:36 AM UTC-5, KC wrote:

You haven't proved anything. Nobody here but retard don and possibly
dick believes you...

"retard don"....Paaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha