| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
My first...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example.  |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. ~~Crickets~~ -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. ~~Crickets~~ Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are *entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense of religion. And no, I'm not asking. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. ~~Crickets~~ Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are *entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense of religion. And no, I'm not asking. No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge. If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post them here? It's all about behavior. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. ~cricketts~ -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On 2/8/15 1:09 PM, Abit Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. ~cricketts~ Your sense of entitlement is humorous. You think that because you post a question, you are entitled to an answer. -- Proud to be a Liberal. |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
My first...
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:08:12 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/8/15 1:09 PM, Abit Loco wrote: On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B wrote: On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote: Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot of fun as speaker. === Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country? You should try it. === PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question. Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts. He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable' behavior. My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the Wiccan religion, for example. If that is the case, why post them here? You lay your own traps for yourself. ~cricketts~ Your sense of entitlement is humorous. You think that because you post a question, you are entitled to an answer. Never...for those hard questions. -- Guns don't cause problems. The behavior of certain gun owners causes problems. |
Hybrid Mode
