KC wrote:
On 1/7/2015 7:43 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/7/15 6:13 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.


The real Gohmert doesn't post here and therefore is not part of my
decision to not directly insult other posters here. It's not that subtle.

So, you want to make the rules again... seriously, **** off...

As there are no rules here, each of us makes our own. It is fine with me if
you want to defend the "honor" of Louis Gohmert.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 20:05:27 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 7:54 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:24:28 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.

===

I find that less abhorent than his stated desire to have an
incompetent idealogue in a high public office.


If you are referring to Louis Gohmert and my comment about him, he
already is in high public office.

It is an interesting phenomenon that so many Republican officeholders
and wannabes at all levels are like Gohmert in so many ways. I am not
saying there are no bat**** crazy Dems, but not nearly as many as in the
GOP.

Given the ratio of pro-liberal to pro-conservative media, you would
expect to hear about 8 times as many anti-Republican stories as
anti-Democrat stories.

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 at 4:56:54 PM UTC-5, KC wrote:

Well, with all due respect it would be nice to hear from you why you
acted like you did for so many years, and why now all the change all of
a sudden?

Hopefully, he's dying.

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

On 1/9/2015 8:22 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 9 Jan 2015 03:10:53 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:03:07 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/8/15 6:54 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:11:56 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:44:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 6:24 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:13:54 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:26:39 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:58:40 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Once again, you are wrong. A lunatic like Gohmert would have been a lot
of fun as speaker.

===

Have you ever, once, thought about what would be good for the country?

You should try it.

===

PS, I don't consider that post to be even the slightest bit snarly. In
light of your stated desire to have a lunatic as speaker just because
you'd consider it funny, I think it's a perfectly legitimate question.
Back up from your keyboard and read your own posts.

He, et al, consider his anti-religion crap to be 'normal, sociable'
behavior.



My positions on religion are not aimed at individuals here. I don't, for
example, claim you are a flaming asshole for being an adherent of the
Wiccan religion, for example.

If that is the case, why post them here?

You lay your own traps for yourself.

~~Crickets~~


Why do you think that when you ask a question of someone, you are
*entitled* to an answer? I don't know why you are coming to the defense
of religion. And no, I'm not asking.

No defense of anything. Nice try at an old dodge.

If your anti-religious posts are not aimed at anyone here, why post
them here?

It's all about behavior.

I suggest you take care of your own behavior, and stop trying to moderate
what others post. I am not insulting anyone personally and that is the end
of it. I don't answer to you. Got it? Hope so. Have a nice night.

Why, when you are asked a question about your motives for
anti-religious posts, are you too afraid to answer the question?


Or asked to explain why he was such a useless piece of **** here for
over ten years...