On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:05:45 PM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote:
Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 12/10/14 6:36 PM, Califbill wrote:
BAR wrote:
In article , says....

On 12/10/14 4:08 PM, Toad Gig wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:03:23 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 12/10/14 4:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
...target shooting today:

http://tinyurl.com/q7lrxba


Holes at left from my .22LR S&W AR-15/22. Just ordinary LRN ammo, 40
grain. Sighting in scope from the top to the bottom, where I got a two
shot group of a hair more than an inch. 100 yards.

Holes on right from my 1892 Win carbine in .357 MAG. Already sighted in
with the red dot for 100 yards, so the two shot group was what I
expected to see. Just regular ball ammo.



Whoops...this is the back side of the chunk of cardboard. The other side
is just plain brown and the holes don't "pop" as well visually.

Wow. That's extremely impressive.

WAFJ!


Yeah, JohnnyTrash, if only you could see a small target at 100 yards,
eh?

What's the matter you cant hold a 1 inch group?

Nobody believe's you were shooting 100 yards.

And with a scope? Either crappy firearm, or crappy shooter.



snerk How's your shooting with a non-target .22LR firearm at 100
yards, Bilious? I got on the paper with my first shot. Oh, and no scope
on the carbine...just a 3 MOA red dot.




I shoot that well with my 223 AR and no red dot or scope.

Bull****. You aren't shooting 1" groups at 100 yards on an ordinary AR15
with metal sights only. Bull****, bull****, bull****.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Toad, just for the record, were you using two hands or one? I know better than to ask if the rifle was supported. Are you sure you showed us the back side. Those holes look pretty clean for being on the back side of cardboard.. (Not that I'm doubting anything you say, mind you.)

BTW, do you own round pencils or hexagonal pencils? Just askin'.