F*O*A*D wrote:
On 12/5/14 6:22 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:10:15 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 12/5/14 5:56 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:12:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/5/2014 2:54 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:32:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


So, what have you learned about the denizens here?
Pretty bad, huh?
Don't fret, they are anachronisms and will soon fade away.
Old men die, but the United States of America lives on.
Good enough way to kill some time, I suppose.
Personally, I prefer watching guys playing video games on
Twitch, or
playing them myself.
Far Cry 4 is damn good. The game provides boating, guns and
titties.
Woohoo!

Sounds like that would be more fun than burying his head in the
sand!



There's a word I am searching for that describes your type of
purposeful
but dishonest misrepresentations of what is said.

I'll think of it eventually.


To my suggestion of not watching MSNBC, etc, did you not say something
like, 'better than burying your head in the sand'? I could go back and
find the post but I'm too lazy.

Did I make a dishonest representation of your 'ingrained' comments? Or
your Tiger Woods comments? If I make a dishonest representation, tell
me what's dishonest about it.

On the other hand, if one of your sarcastic comments gets turned back
to you, live with it.



Hehehe. What a consistent asshole you are, Herring. You're always
dishonestly and deliberately misinterpreting and misstating what your
opponents here post.

It would help if my 'opponents' would be a bit forthcoming about their
comments. As soon as one of your bits of wisdom turns out to be
bull****, you start with the name-calling. Ever noticed that, Krause?

When it comes to you and yours, I'll do my best to be consistent.


Nice attempt at deflection.


You're specialty is deflection. When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away.

On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:53:13 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 12/5/14 6:22 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:10:15 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 12/5/14 5:56 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:12:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/5/2014 2:54 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:32:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


So, what have you learned about the denizens here?
Pretty bad, huh?
Don't fret, they are anachronisms and will soon fade away.
Old men die, but the United States of America lives on.
Good enough way to kill some time, I suppose.
Personally, I prefer watching guys playing video games on Twitch, or
playing them myself.
Far Cry 4 is damn good. The game provides boating, guns and titties.
Woohoo!

Sounds like that would be more fun than burying his head in the sand!



There's a word I am searching for that describes your type of purposeful
but dishonest misrepresentations of what is said.

I'll think of it eventually.


To my suggestion of not watching MSNBC, etc, did you not say something
like, 'better than burying your head in the sand'? I could go back and
find the post but I'm too lazy.

Did I make a dishonest representation of your 'ingrained' comments? Or
your Tiger Woods comments? If I make a dishonest representation, tell
me what's dishonest about it.

On the other hand, if one of your sarcastic comments gets turned back
to you, live with it.



Hehehe. What a consistent asshole you are, Herring. You're always
dishonestly and deliberately misinterpreting and misstating what your
opponents here post.

It would help if my 'opponents' would be a bit forthcoming about their
comments. As soon as one of your bits of wisdom turns out to be
bull****, you start with the name-calling. Ever noticed that, Krause?

When it comes to you and yours, I'll do my best to be consistent.


Nice attempt at deflection.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

We 'cunning linguists' are great 'deflectors'. It seems that you folks who can't answer legitimate questions, after making your snide little comments, are the 'great deflectors'.

On 12/7/14 7:09 AM, John H. wrote:
On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:53:13 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 12/5/14 6:22 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:10:15 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 12/5/14 5:56 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:12:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/5/2014 2:54 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:32:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


So, what have you learned about the denizens here?
Pretty bad, huh?
Don't fret, they are anachronisms and will soon fade away.
Old men die, but the United States of America lives on.
Good enough way to kill some time, I suppose.
Personally, I prefer watching guys playing video games on Twitch, or
playing them myself.
Far Cry 4 is damn good. The game provides boating, guns and titties.
Woohoo!

Sounds like that would be more fun than burying his head in the sand!



There's a word I am searching for that describes your type of purposeful
but dishonest misrepresentations of what is said.

I'll think of it eventually.


To my suggestion of not watching MSNBC, etc, did you not say something
like, 'better than burying your head in the sand'? I could go back and
find the post but I'm too lazy.

Did I make a dishonest representation of your 'ingrained' comments? Or
your Tiger Woods comments? If I make a dishonest representation, tell
me what's dishonest about it.

On the other hand, if one of your sarcastic comments gets turned back
to you, live with it.



Hehehe. What a consistent asshole you are, Herring. You're always
dishonestly and deliberately misinterpreting and misstating what your
opponents here post.

It would help if my 'opponents' would be a bit forthcoming about their
comments. As soon as one of your bits of wisdom turns out to be
bull****, you start with the name-calling. Ever noticed that, Krause?

When it comes to you and yours, I'll do my best to be consistent.


Nice attempt at deflection.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

We 'cunning linguists' are great 'deflectors'. It seems that you folks who can't answer legitimate questions, after making your snide little comments, are the 'great deflectors'.


Your thought processes and writing skills are too flaccid for you to be
a cunning linguist, and you are delusional if you think your loaded
questions are legitimate. You should consider sticking to oral exercises
with your right-wing fella-ists here.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

On 12/6/2014 11:07 PM, Roger wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 12/5/14 6:22 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:10:15 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 12/5/14 5:56 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:12:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/5/2014 2:54 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:32:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


So, what have you learned about the denizens here?
Pretty bad, huh?
Don't fret, they are anachronisms and will soon fade away.
Old men die, but the United States of America lives on.
Good enough way to kill some time, I suppose.
Personally, I prefer watching guys playing video games on
Twitch, or
playing them myself.
Far Cry 4 is damn good. The game provides boating, guns and
titties.
Woohoo!

Sounds like that would be more fun than burying his head in the
sand!



There's a word I am searching for that describes your type of
purposeful
but dishonest misrepresentations of what is said.

I'll think of it eventually.


To my suggestion of not watching MSNBC, etc, did you not say something
like, 'better than burying your head in the sand'? I could go back and
find the post but I'm too lazy.

Did I make a dishonest representation of your 'ingrained' comments? Or
your Tiger Woods comments? If I make a dishonest representation, tell
me what's dishonest about it.

On the other hand, if one of your sarcastic comments gets turned back
to you, live with it.



Hehehe. What a consistent asshole you are, Herring. You're always
dishonestly and deliberately misinterpreting and misstating what your
opponents here post.

It would help if my 'opponents' would be a bit forthcoming about their
comments. As soon as one of your bits of wisdom turns out to be
bull****, you start with the name-calling. Ever noticed that, Krause?

When it comes to you and yours, I'll do my best to be consistent.


Nice attempt at deflection.


You're specialty is deflection. When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away.

Krause has never denied the bankruptcies, foreclosure, or tax warrants.
How could a know it all like him get into such financial trouble?

On 12/7/2014 7:09 AM, John H. wrote:
On Friday, December 5, 2014 7:53:13 PM UTC-5, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 12/5/14 6:22 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:10:15 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 12/5/14 5:56 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:12:47 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/5/2014 2:54 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:32:30 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:


So, what have you learned about the denizens here?
Pretty bad, huh?
Don't fret, they are anachronisms and will soon fade away.
Old men die, but the United States of America lives on.
Good enough way to kill some time, I suppose.
Personally, I prefer watching guys playing video games on Twitch, or
playing them myself.
Far Cry 4 is damn good. The game provides boating, guns and titties.
Woohoo!

Sounds like that would be more fun than burying his head in the sand!



There's a word I am searching for that describes your type of purposeful
but dishonest misrepresentations of what is said.

I'll think of it eventually.


To my suggestion of not watching MSNBC, etc, did you not say something
like, 'better than burying your head in the sand'? I could go back and
find the post but I'm too lazy.

Did I make a dishonest representation of your 'ingrained' comments? Or
your Tiger Woods comments? If I make a dishonest representation, tell
me what's dishonest about it.

On the other hand, if one of your sarcastic comments gets turned back
to you, live with it.



Hehehe. What a consistent asshole you are, Herring. You're always
dishonestly and deliberately misinterpreting and misstating what your
opponents here post.

It would help if my 'opponents' would be a bit forthcoming about their
comments. As soon as one of your bits of wisdom turns out to be
bull****, you start with the name-calling. Ever noticed that, Krause?

When it comes to you and yours, I'll do my best to be consistent.


Nice attempt at deflection.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

We 'cunning linguists' are great 'deflectors'. It seems that you folks who can't answer legitimate questions, after making your snide little comments, are the 'great deflectors'.

Harry is just an ankle biter. He does it to get attention.

12:07 AMRoger
- show quoted text -
" You're specialty is deflection. *When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away. "


Hey Ditzy.....
Shouldn't that be 'YOUR'??

On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 05:09:44 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:


12:07 AMRoger
- show quoted text -
" You're specialty is deflection. *When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away. "


Hey Ditzy.....
Shouldn't that be 'YOUR'??

Yup, Roger, he bit!

You're almost as funny as the Toad, Don.
--

"When your argument has backed a liberal into a corner,
expect to be called a racist."

On 12/7/2014 8:39 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 05:09:44 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:


12:07 AMRoger
- show quoted text -
" You're specialty is deflection. When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away. "


Hey Ditzy.....
Shouldn't that be 'YOUR'??

Yup, Roger, he bit!

You're almost as funny as the Toad, Don.

You mean the human spell checka. I'm glad he learned something else
besides broom pushing up there at St. Mary's Boys School.

On 12/7/2014 8:39 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 05:09:44 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:


12:07 AMRoger
- show quoted text -
" You're specialty is deflection. When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away. "


Hey Ditzy.....
Shouldn't that be 'YOUR'??

Yup, Roger, he bit!

You're almost as funny as the Toad, Don.


And why would it be YOUR? That is as... oh forget it...

On 12/7/2014 9:58 AM, KC wrote:
On 12/7/2014 8:39 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 05:09:44 -0800 (PST), True North
wrote:


12:07 AMRoger
- show quoted text -
" You're specialty is deflection. When the topic is too close to home,
like your history as a tax cheat, you simply ignore the posts and hope
they will go away. "


Hey Ditzy.....
Shouldn't that be 'YOUR'??

Yup, Roger, he bit!

You're almost as funny as the Toad, Don.


And why would it be YOUR? That is as... oh forget it...

Good decision.