On 12/4/2014 10:39 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:35:21 -0500, KC wrote:

On 12/4/2014 10:31 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:11:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 9:26 AM, KC wrote:
On 12/4/2014 3:46 AM, RGrew176 wrote:
Poco Loco;1020850 Wrote:
....not the chokehold.

Guess they didn't read the coroner's report.

http://tinyurl.com/p8ggn2g
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

....Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)

Make that the illegal choke hold. The choke hold had been banned by the
NYCPD some time ago. I think the grand jury got this one wrong.





I saw an interview last night by a guy that does the math Either way
the hold was an "artery" hold not a choke hold. It could very well have
cut off or slowed the blood flow but the coroners report was clear, "no
bruising on the throat, no damage to the airway"....



Ah, maybe you saw Peter King, the Republican Congressman from New York.
He's making the media circuit (was just on Fox News again) making
these claims.

Did he perform his own, independent autopsy?

Perhaps he read the coroner's report?

I never said anything about Peter King...

I was, responding to Luddite's comment, suggesting that perhaps Peter
King had read the autopsy report.

No problem, just trying to keep things clear. Either way, just for the
record, I have not taken a stand on this one yet. I think I can see what
happened there but I am not sure. I do know one thing though, I "heard"
that 18 of the 24 on the GJ were "not white", and 9 were black. This is
just what I heard. If that is the case, it takes 12 to pass down a bill,
and they didn't.
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

...Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)

On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:49:03 -0500, KC wrote:

On 12/4/2014 10:39 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:35:21 -0500, KC wrote:

On 12/4/2014 10:31 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:11:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

On 12/4/2014 9:26 AM, KC wrote:
On 12/4/2014 3:46 AM, RGrew176 wrote:
Poco Loco;1020850 Wrote:
....not the chokehold.

Guess they didn't read the coroner's report.

http://tinyurl.com/p8ggn2g
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

....Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)

Make that the illegal choke hold. The choke hold had been banned by the
NYCPD some time ago. I think the grand jury got this one wrong.





I saw an interview last night by a guy that does the math Either way
the hold was an "artery" hold not a choke hold. It could very well have
cut off or slowed the blood flow but the coroners report was clear, "no
bruising on the throat, no damage to the airway"....



Ah, maybe you saw Peter King, the Republican Congressman from New York.
He's making the media circuit (was just on Fox News again) making
these claims.

Did he perform his own, independent autopsy?

Perhaps he read the coroner's report?

I never said anything about Peter King...

I was, responding to Luddite's comment, suggesting that perhaps Peter
King had read the autopsy report.

No problem, just trying to keep things clear. Either way, just for the
record, I have not taken a stand on this one yet. I think I can see what
happened there but I am not sure. I do know one thing though, I "heard"
that 18 of the 24 on the GJ were "not white", and 9 were black. This is
just what I heard. If that is the case, it takes 12 to pass down a bill,
and they didn't.
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

...Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)



And reported on CNN last night was that the police'man' in charge of
the detail was a black female sergeant.

Question - shouldn't my signature disappear when you respond to a post
of mine?
--

"The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument
with a liberal."

....Peter Brimelow (Author)
(Thanks, Luddite!)