Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Police Union - Disrespect Killed Garner
On 12/5/14 7:13 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:59:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 12/4/14 9:28 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:58:42 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 12/4/14 3:55 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On 4 Dec 2014 18:25:47 GMT, F*O*A*D wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/4/2014 1:07 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:01:02 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/4/2014 10:36 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:11:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/4/2014 9:26 AM, KC wrote: On 12/4/2014 3:46 AM, RGrew176 wrote: Poco Loco;1020850 Wrote: ....not the chokehold. Guess they didn't read the coroner's report. http://tinyurl.com/p8ggn2g -- "The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument with a liberal." ....Peter Brimelow (Author) (Thanks, Luddite!) Make that the illegal choke hold. The choke hold had been banned by the NYCPD some time ago. I think the grand jury got this one wrong. I saw an interview last night by a guy that does the math Either way the hold was an "artery" hold not a choke hold. It could very well have cut off or slowed the blood flow but the coroners report was clear, "no bruising on the throat, no damage to the airway".... Ah, maybe you saw Peter King, the Republican Congressman from New York. He's making the media circuit (was just on Fox News again) making these claims. Did he perform his own, independent autopsy? Perhaps the police union did: "Police union officials and Pantaleo's lawyer, however, argued that the officer used a takedown move taught by the police department, not a banned maneuver, because Garner was resisting arrest. They said his poor health was the main reason he died." http://tinyurl.com/omvs3k6 Surely you and Toad wouldn't contradict the unions, would you? A police union opinion on the cause of death is not the same as a medical examiner's autopsy and death certificate. If the medical examiner had not called Garner's death a homicide, there never would have been a GJ or any suggestion of potential charges brought on the police officer involved. I think they said "homicide" because the death was a result of the fight. With the ambiguous cause of death, I think they have to charge them all or let them all go,.He still seemed to be alive after they got him on the ground and #99 was holding his head down (not choking him). Long after the fight EMS is on video checking his pulse and talking to him. He still said he couldn't breathe. A few minutes later he was out and they picked him up, still breathing according to EMS. It sounds like the 3 heart attacks I have watched. (two at work and one diving in the keys) One guy died, 2 are still alive. I saw (and just posted about) that video. It was the first time I saw the extended version that showed what happened after the take down. I agree. My non-professional opinion is that he died of a heart attack. Caused by the police assault... I wonder how much the civil suit settlement will be. That's what police unions are for - to protect bad cops, eh? -- You keep repeating that, indicating your ignorance of the purposes of a labor union and that if there is a settlement, it will come from a governmental agency, not the cop. No surprise. So you agree with the New York Police Union Chief? New York Police Union Chief: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...garner-n261586 You'll note that's from NBC, not FOX. -- My comment was about your ignorance, nothing more. Of course not. The corner's a bitch. -- Is that your new perseveration? Frankly, Johnny, I see nothing to gain by playing your little games here. Your intellectual equals, the two Scotties, for example, seem more amenable to your rigid simplemindedness. -- I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers. After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer. |
#42
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Police Union - Disrespect Killed Garner
On 12/5/2014 8:11 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 12/5/14 7:13 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:59:59 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 12/4/14 9:28 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 15:58:42 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: On 12/4/14 3:55 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On 4 Dec 2014 18:25:47 GMT, F*O*A*D wrote: "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/4/2014 1:07 PM, wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 11:01:02 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/4/2014 10:36 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:11:09 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 12/4/2014 9:26 AM, KC wrote: On 12/4/2014 3:46 AM, RGrew176 wrote: Poco Loco;1020850 Wrote: ....not the chokehold. Guess they didn't read the coroner's report. http://tinyurl.com/p8ggn2g -- "The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who's winning an argument with a liberal." ....Peter Brimelow (Author) (Thanks, Luddite!) Make that the illegal choke hold. The choke hold had been banned by the NYCPD some time ago. I think the grand jury got this one wrong. I saw an interview last night by a guy that does the math Either way the hold was an "artery" hold not a choke hold. It could very well have cut off or slowed the blood flow but the coroners report was clear, "no bruising on the throat, no damage to the airway".... Ah, maybe you saw Peter King, the Republican Congressman from New York. He's making the media circuit (was just on Fox News again) making these claims. Did he perform his own, independent autopsy? Perhaps the police union did: "Police union officials and Pantaleo's lawyer, however, argued that the officer used a takedown move taught by the police department, not a banned maneuver, because Garner was resisting arrest. They said his poor health was the main reason he died." http://tinyurl.com/omvs3k6 Surely you and Toad wouldn't contradict the unions, would you? A police union opinion on the cause of death is not the same as a medical examiner's autopsy and death certificate. If the medical examiner had not called Garner's death a homicide, there never would have been a GJ or any suggestion of potential charges brought on the police officer involved. I think they said "homicide" because the death was a result of the fight. With the ambiguous cause of death, I think they have to charge them all or let them all go,.He still seemed to be alive after they got him on the ground and #99 was holding his head down (not choking him). Long after the fight EMS is on video checking his pulse and talking to him. He still said he couldn't breathe. A few minutes later he was out and they picked him up, still breathing according to EMS. It sounds like the 3 heart attacks I have watched. (two at work and one diving in the keys) One guy died, 2 are still alive. I saw (and just posted about) that video. It was the first time I saw the extended version that showed what happened after the take down. I agree. My non-professional opinion is that he died of a heart attack. Caused by the police assault... I wonder how much the civil suit settlement will be. That's what police unions are for - to protect bad cops, eh? -- You keep repeating that, indicating your ignorance of the purposes of a labor union and that if there is a settlement, it will come from a governmental agency, not the cop. No surprise. So you agree with the New York Police Union Chief? New York Police Union Chief: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...garner-n261586 You'll note that's from NBC, not FOX. -- My comment was about your ignorance, nothing more. Of course not. The corner's a bitch. -- Is that your new perseveration? Frankly, Johnny, I see nothing to gain by playing your little games here. Your intellectual equals, the two Scotties, for example, seem more amenable to your rigid simplemindedness. WAFA! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Floriduh Police | General | |||
Lines the Police will say..... | General | |||
Police killers? | General | |||
Caring Police | General |