On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a
couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately.
However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory
accounts by witnesses.


The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and
came back at least 25 feet before he went down..


Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed. Brown
was not.

Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he
did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome
should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual.

Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some
lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and
have Wilson found not guilty.

And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened
later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators
like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black
man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist
sees it.


How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars
and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was announced?

None.

There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature.

Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world
to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind
closed doors and with controlled evidence.

Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to
a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable
racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout
the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize
that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain
acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others
who make thier living being divisive.

On 11/29/2014 8:24 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 21:27:16 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/28/14 9:07 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:52:27 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:


You don't understand the purpose of a grand jury or what a prosecutor is
supposed to do when presenting. It isn't to indict, necessarily, but in
this case, the prosecutor seemingly did not want an indictment.

"Why spend the taxpayer's money on a losing case? Unless he wanted to
placate the bed-wetting libs, like yourself." (42580435)

You are delusional if you think I give any consideration to the
utterances of you and your right-wing racist buddies here, Johnny. On
matters political and racial, you're all just clones of PsychoScotty.

Toad, your response speaks for itself.

That comment is not up for consideration by his holiness. ;-)

On 11/29/2014 8:50 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a
couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately.
However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory
accounts by witnesses.


The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and
came back at least 25 feet before he went down..


Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed.
Brown
was not.

Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he
did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome
should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual.

Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some
lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and
have Wilson found not guilty.

And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened
later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators
like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black
man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist
sees it.


How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars
and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was announced?

None.

There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature.

Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world
to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind
closed doors and with controlled evidence.

Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to
a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable
racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout
the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize
that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain
acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others
who make thier living being divisive.


Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car
burnings resulted from him having a fair trial?

On 11/29/2014 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:50 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:


If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a
couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately.
However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory
accounts by witnesses.


The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and
came back at least 25 feet before he went down..


Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed.
Brown
was not.

Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he
did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome
should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual.

Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some
lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and
have Wilson found not guilty.

And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened
later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators
like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black
man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist
sees it.


How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars
and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was
announced?

None.

There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature.

Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world
to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind
closed doors and with controlled evidence.

Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to
a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable
racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout
the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize
that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain
acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others
who make thier living being divisive.


Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car
burnings resulted from him having a fair trial?


What do you mean Yada Yada.? You sound like Harry now.

On 11/29/14 9:08 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:50 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/29/2014 8:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/29/2014 7:46 AM, Toasty The Snowless Man wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:15 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/28/2014 11:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:48:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:


If Brown was aggressively going after Wilson after taking at least a
couple of gun shot hits, then I think Wilson acted appropriately.
However, I don't just don't know for sure. Too many contradictory
accounts by witnesses.


The blood evidence on the pavement showed that he turned around and
came back at least 25 feet before he went down..


Turned around and came back 25 feet to do what? Wilson was armed.
Brown
was not.

Look, I am not trying to make a case that Wilson was wrong in what he
did. I just think the DA predetermined what he felt the GJ outcome
should be and influenced it that way. That's what is unusual.

Given what happened later, it may have been better to indite on some
lesser charge, have a public trial, present all the same evidence and
have Wilson found not guilty.

And two million dollars later the riots would still come. What happened
later had nothing to do with Wilson. It had to do with racist agitators
like Sharpton and the punk's felon stepfather. All they saw was black
man down white man standing; exactly the way our own rec.boats racist
sees it.


How many violent protests, demonstrations, burning of buildings, cars
and looting occurred when the verdict for George Zimmerman was
announced?

None.

There were some protests but they were all peaceful in nature.

Granted, Zimmerman was not a cop but his trial was public for the world
to see. His fate was not determined by an anonymous group hidden behind
closed doors and with controlled evidence.

Zimmerman's case was slightly different. He was not allowed his right to
a Grand Jury. He was the underdog who was pursued by highly recognizable
racist figureheads. Martin's parents maintained their dignity throughout
the trial. The local black community was sophisticated enough to realize
that rioting and looting did not serve their purpose to maintain
acceptable race relations, despite the taunts from Sharpton and others
who make thier living being divisive.


Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car
burnings resulted from him having a fair trial?




Better watch it there, fella...pretty soon they'll be accusing you of
being a...communist.


--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

On 11/29/14 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:08:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car
burnings resulted from him having a fair trial?

The issue here was they would never believe Wilson would get a fair
trial. Think Rodney King.


A jury of nine whites and three blacks...would result in a hung jury, of
course.


--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

On 11/29/2014 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:22:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/29/14 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:08:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car
burnings resulted from him having a fair trial?

The issue here was they would never believe Wilson would get a fair
trial. Think Rodney King.


A jury of nine whites and three blacks...would result in a hung jury, of
course.

With this evidence, you would hang an all black jury if they didn't
simply acquit.
Now it turns out the pathologist the Brown family hired for their
widely hyped autopsy is a fraud.


I thought Dr. Baden was on that team?

On 11/30/14 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 13:07:27 -0500, KC wrote:

On 11/29/2014 12:47 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 12:22:22 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/29/14 12:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:08:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Yada, yada, yada. So how many violent protests, building and car
burnings resulted from him having a fair trial?

The issue here was they would never believe Wilson would get a fair
trial. Think Rodney King.


A jury of nine whites and three blacks...would result in a hung jury, of
course.

With this evidence, you would hang an all black jury if they didn't
simply acquit.
Now it turns out the pathologist the Brown family hired for their
widely hyped autopsy is a fraud.


I thought Dr. Baden was on that team?

Parcells took the lead and he is a fraud



Ahh, he's the same sort of fake-credentialed fraud as *Dr* Rand Paul.

--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.

On 11/30/2014 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 12:35:42 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/30/14 12:30 PM, wrote:


I thought Dr. Baden was on that team?

Parcells took the lead and he is a fraud



Ahh, he's the same sort of fake-credentialed fraud as *Dr* Rand Paul.

Duke is not a medical school?


How about Dr. Dr. Dr. Kare...... um, forget it, that was a lie

On 11/30/14 1:05 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 12:35:42 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 11/30/14 12:30 PM, wrote:


I thought Dr. Baden was on that team?

Parcells took the lead and he is a fraud



Ahh, he's the same sort of fake-credentialed fraud as *Dr* Rand Paul.

Duke is not a medical school?


"Dr" Paul didn't like the licensing provisions/procedures of the
recognized professional organization that governs his specialty, so he
started his own.



--
I feel no need to explain my politics to stupid right-wingers.
After all, I am *not* the Jackass Whisperer.