LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default A actual boat question

"Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 10/29/2014 6:34 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:38:39 -0500, "James"
wrote:

Hi Group, I'm looking at a 28' Fiberform with twin rebuilt Chevy 250
6cly engines (165hp each). How do thes compare with a single 350 Chevy
in the 260 to 300hp range for power and fuel consumption? How about
idling down to trolling speeds? Thanks, Jim


===

There is a lot of appeal to twin engines from the stand point of "get
home" reliability but they are definitely a compromise, especially on
a boat that size with inboard engines. For starters, both engines
almost certainly share a common fuel tank and a lot of problems
originate there. Twins also weigh considerably more than a large
single, have more underwater drag, take up more interior space, and
require twice the maintenance. It is unlikely that you will realize
more speed because of the weight and drag issues.



I am not familiar with Fiberform boats and the OP didn't mention what
type of drive system it has, be it fixed shafts, props and rudders or
I/O. He also seems to be concerned with achieving slow trolling speed.

I'd go for the twins, especially if it's a shaft/prop/rudder design. You
make valid points about common failure modes (gas, etc.) but if you have
a gas problem with a single, you are 100 percent sure of being screwed.

The twins will offer better maneuverability for docking and a slower
trolling speed. You simply throw one transmission in neutral (or shut one engine off).

I'd be less enthusiastic about twins if the drive systems are I/O. Having
had a couple of I/O powered boats, I would never get another one again.
Gimmee shafts, props and rudders!


I would hope the cost of the boat is extremely low. Those are really old
motors. And Fiberform has been gone a long time. Blisters were the main
culprit on killing Fiberform. They made a lot of the Viet Nam river boats,
and were required to put a fire retardant in to the resin. Great idea.
But they also put it in to the civilian boats they made, and it caused
blisters after a couple years. Short lived boats in VN probably never
lasted long enough to matter if blisters.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
actual boat question - really! nom=de=plume General 23 November 9th 09 08:28 PM
WARNING, ACTUAL BOAT QUESTION SteveB General 5 November 4th 09 11:29 AM
Actual boat question SteveB General 23 September 5th 09 08:46 PM
Actual BOAT question: gas lines SteveB[_2_] General 4 April 21st 09 03:50 AM
Actual boating question! [email protected] General 3 November 7th 08 04:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017