|
Positions
On 10/27/2014 11:55 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/27/14 11:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. I'll bet a $900 rifle scope on it. :-) I'll have you know that my 100 year old grandmother in law, a prim and proper Southern Baptist lady, said I had "nice legs" when she first saw me in Bermuda shorts. 100 year olds aren't choosy. |
Positions
On 10/27/14 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/27/2014 11:55 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 11:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. I'll bet a $900 rifle scope on it. :-) I'll have you know that my 100 year old grandmother in law, a prim and proper Southern Baptist lady, said I had "nice legs" when she first saw me in Bermuda shorts. 100 year olds aren't choosy. You're hurting my feelings! I had this delusion of being the Designated Hunkie for Old Biddies. :) -- A vote for any Republican is a vote AGAINST: Social Security, Medicare, Minimum Wage, Fair Pay, Food Stamps, Clean Air and Water, Modest Gun Regulations, Public Schools, Rebuilding Infrastructure and Good Jobs, Women's Rights, Veterans’ Rights, LGBT Rights, and, of course, Your Right to Vote. |
Positions
On 10/27/2014 12:35 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/27/14 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 11:55 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: I'll have you know that my 100 year old grandmother in law, a prim and proper Southern Baptist lady, said I had "nice legs" when she first saw me in Bermuda shorts. 100 year olds aren't choosy. You're hurting my feelings! I had this delusion of being the Designated Hunkie for Old Biddies. :) My father was a very tall and distinguished looking guy. My wife's 90 something year old Italian grandmother (who immigrated to the USA just prior to WWII) used to swoon all over him when they met at any family gatherings. She'd clasp her hands together in classic Italian style and start babbling away in Italian while fluttering her eyelids at him. I remember asking my wife's father and mother (who both spoke Italian) what she was saying. They always answered, "Never mind, you don't want to know". |
Positions
On 10/27/14 12:56 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/27/2014 12:35 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 11:55 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: I'll have you know that my 100 year old grandmother in law, a prim and proper Southern Baptist lady, said I had "nice legs" when she first saw me in Bermuda shorts. 100 year olds aren't choosy. You're hurting my feelings! I had this delusion of being the Designated Hunkie for Old Biddies. :) My father was a very tall and distinguished looking guy. My wife's 90 something year old Italian grandmother (who immigrated to the USA just prior to WWII) used to swoon all over him when they met at any family gatherings. She'd clasp her hands together in classic Italian style and start babbling away in Italian while fluttering her eyelids at him. I remember asking my wife's father and mother (who both spoke Italian) what she was saying. They always answered, "Never mind, you don't want to know". Ahh. Delightful. Maybe I'll get invited to pose for "Ancient Hottie Monthly." :) Title works for me and hopefully my female admirers. -- A vote for any Republican is a vote AGAINST: Social Security, Medicare, Minimum Wage, Fair Pay, Food Stamps, Clean Air and Water, Modest Gun Regulations, Public Schools, Rebuilding Infrastructure and Good Jobs, Women's Rights, Veterans’ Rights, LGBT Rights, and, of course, Your Right to Vote. |
Positions
On 10/27/2014 11:55 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/27/14 11:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. I'll bet a $900 rifle scope on it. :-) I'll have you know that my 100 year old grandmother in law, a prim and proper Southern Baptist lady, said I had "nice legs" when she first saw me in Bermuda shorts. Is she one of those blind Linotype operators? |
Positions
On 10/27/2014 12:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/27/2014 11:55 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 11:46 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. I'll bet a $900 rifle scope on it. :-) I'll have you know that my 100 year old grandmother in law, a prim and proper Southern Baptist lady, said I had "nice legs" when she first saw me in Bermuda shorts. 100 year olds aren't choosy. Krause has been banned from family reunions and gatherings. Doncha just love it? |
Positions
On 10/27/2014 9:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. Yes, let's talk about legs rather than the topic because you can't defend your position. But that's just more of the usual. Mikek --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Positions
On 10/27/14 1:16 PM, amdx wrote:
On 10/27/2014 9:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. Yes, let's talk about legs rather than the topic because you can't defend your position. But that's just more of the usual. Mikek --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com What is the point of debating "positions" with a guy who believes Jimmy Carter was president in 1984? -- A vote for any Republican is a vote AGAINST: Social Security, Medicare, Minimum Wage, Fair Pay, Food Stamps, Clean Air and Water, Modest Gun Regulations, Public Schools, Rebuilding Infrastructure and Good Jobs, Women's Rights, Veterans’ Rights, LGBT Rights, and, of course, Your Right to Vote. |
Positions
On 10/27/2014 12:47 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/27/14 1:16 PM, amdx wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. Yes, let's talk about legs rather than the topic because you can't defend your position. But that's just more of the usual. Mikek --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com What is the point of debating "positions" with a guy who believes Jimmy Carter was president in 1984? Nice job, you found I made an error. I tied the high interest rates of the Carter years to when I got my first house. When Carter became president in Jan of 1977 the prime rate was 6.5%, when he was not reelected in 1981 the prime rate was 20.5%, with the rate having peaked at 21.5% just a month earlier. Reagan's policies brought it down to 10.5% before he left office. So the rates were high from Carters ineffective policies, but he was out of office when I bought my home. I also got laid off, because of Carters high interest rates. The company I worked for borrowed money at Prime plus 2%, the high rates became to costly and they had to cut back. By 1986 Reagan's economy had me making more money than I ever did, or have since, inflation adjusted. But again, you changed the subject instead of showing evidence upholding your position. Mikek --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Positions
On 10/27/14 2:21 PM, amdx wrote:
On 10/27/2014 12:47 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 1:16 PM, amdx wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:56 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:29 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 10:21 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 10/27/14 10:06 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/27/2014 9:25 AM, F*O*A*D erroneously repeats (over and over): The "changes" the GOP wants will destroy all these programs. Some of them certainly need modification, but not the way the GOPers want. Thank you for participating. How do you figure that? You agree that they need "modification" (so does the GOP) yet you say they will be destroyed if anyone other than the Democrats present ideas to improve them. But, that's not what motivated me to post the positions. You just made a big deal about some Fox News journalist who "made up" a story about printing ballots at home in Colorado. I agree, it was stupid. Yet, you do the same thing in your signature line. What makes you different than the Fox News gal other than the fact that she has nicer legs? It is only your unsubstantiated opinion that her legs are nicer than mine. Yes, let's talk about legs rather than the topic because you can't defend your position. But that's just more of the usual. Mikek --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com What is the point of debating "positions" with a guy who believes Jimmy Carter was president in 1984? Nice job, you found I made an error. I tied the high interest rates of the Carter years to when I got my first house. When Carter became president in Jan of 1977 the prime rate was 6.5%, when he was not reelected in 1981 the prime rate was 20.5%, with the rate having peaked at 21.5% just a month earlier. Reagan's policies brought it down to 10.5% before he left office. So the rates were high from Carters ineffective policies, but he was out of office when I bought my home. I also got laid off, because of Carters high interest rates. The company I worked for borrowed money at Prime plus 2%, the high rates became to costly and they had to cut back. By 1986 Reagan's economy had me making more money than I ever did, or have since, inflation adjusted. But again, you changed the subject instead of showing evidence upholding your position. Mikek Sure, Mikey, whatever you say. Perhaps you need a new set of pedals. -- A vote for any Republican is a vote AGAINST: Social Security, Medicare, Minimum Wage, Fair Pay, Food Stamps, Clean Air and Water, Modest Gun Regulations, Public Schools, Rebuilding Infrastructure and Good Jobs, Women's Rights, Veterans’ Rights, LGBT Rights, and, of course, Your Right to Vote. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com