On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.


--
Of life’s simple pleasures, few are more satisfying than being attacked
by the right-wing trash in rec.boats.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage
of right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic
right-wingers competing for the attention she gets.


"significant percentage" = "I'm making **** up". Funny how you
initially posted a link to your advanced Google search page in error.
You have too much time on your hands and/or your narcissism is
controlling you.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.

Never seen Huckabee, Cruz, Santorum et al?
The Palins are just more colorful and intelligent.
BTW, I've been watching mostly CNN, and they covered Palin's spat
repeatedly.
And they're all over the huge terrorist attack on Canada now.
Maybe it's time to protect that border and militarize it.
What happened to the ISIS punks and big bad Ebola?
Damn, I just know what to be afraid of.

wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:44:45 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.

Never seen Huckabee, Cruz, Santorum et al?

I was talking about people who spend any inordinate time watching
Palin. That really just seems to be liberal democrats.
In reality I have not seen much of Huckabee, Cruz and Santortum (AKA
"Frothy") either.


The Palins are just more colorful and intelligent.
BTW, I've been watching mostly CNN, and they covered Palin's spat
repeatedly.

Like I said liberal democrats.

And they're all over the huge terrorist attack on Canada now.
Maybe it's time to protect that border and militarize it.
What happened to the ISIS punks and big bad Ebola?
Damn, I just know what to be afraid of.

CNN is the Crisis News Network but I can't see them now (They had a
falling out with Dish) so I was switching back and forth from Fox and
MSNBC for a while today
It was "We don't know what the hell is going on in Ottawa and we will
keep saying so all day" too.
The only thing different was different talking heads.

So far this is looking like one nut with a gun, who was shot pretty
much right away. Everything else just seems to be hysteria taken as
fact
The more Canada wants to say they are different, the more they seem to
be the same.

I think what has them scared, is a couple days ago there was a terrorist.
New Muslim convert who ran down a couple soldiers. Maybe related?

On 10/22/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.


Some of them are right here in rec.boats, denying their love and
admiration for the Palins, and how the Palins have contributed as much
to this country as the Kennedys and Bidens.

--
Of life’s simple pleasures, few are more satisfying than being attacked
by the right-wing trash in rec.boats.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/22/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.


Some of them are right here in rec.boats, denying their love and
admiration for the Palins, and how the Palins have contributed as much to
this country as the Kennedys and Bidens.


Why did FDR put Joe Kennedy in charge of Wall Street? Because he was the
most successful crook?

On 10/22/14 5:57 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/22/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.


Some of them are right here in rec.boats, denying their love and
admiration for the Palins, and how the Palins have contributed as much to
this country as the Kennedys and Bidens.


Why did FDR put Joe Kennedy in charge of Wall Street? Because he was the
most successful crook?


Three of Joe Kennedy's sons died in the service of this country.


--
Of life’s simple pleasures, few are more satisfying than being attacked
by the right-wing trash in rec.boats.

F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/22/14 5:57 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/22/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.


Some of them are right here in rec.boats, denying their love and
admiration for the Palins, and how the Palins have contributed as much to
this country as the Kennedys and Bidens.


Why did FDR put Joe Kennedy in charge of Wall Street? Because he was the
most successful crook?


Three of Joe Kennedy's sons died in the service of this country.



Yup. Still Joe was a crook.

wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:14:40 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 5:57 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:
On 10/22/14 3:26 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:04:06 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 11:16 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:15:09 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


I had never heard of Sarah Palin until McCain nominated her. I
remember watching her nomination acceptance speech and thinking, "Whoa
.. here is someone different". She gave a very good and obviously well
rehearsed speech. But that was it. Every time she opened her mouth
after that she made a fool of herself. That killed it for me.

I really don't think she has much influence on anyone now-a-days.

The Palins only interest the National Enquirer set and Fox News
watchers. It makes you wonder how Harry fits into this.


Palin is still of interest to and admired by a significant percentage of
right-wingers, although there are plenty of other moronic right-wingers
competing for the attention she gets.

I haven't seen any of them.


Some of them are right here in rec.boats, denying their love and
admiration for the Palins, and how the Palins have contributed as much to
this country as the Kennedys and Bidens.


Why did FDR put Joe Kennedy in charge of Wall Street? Because he was the
most successful crook?


Three of Joe Kennedy's sons died in the service of this country.

.. well one anyway.

JFK was mostly serving himself and RFK was a disservice to the
country.

I think Viet Nam would not have been what it got to be if RFK had not been
killed. Also would not have had Carter.

wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:09:37 -0500, Califbill
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:14:40 -0400, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 10/22/14 5:57 PM, Califbill wrote:
F*O*A*D wrote:

Three of Joe Kennedy's sons died in the service of this country.

.. well one anyway.

JFK was mostly serving himself and RFK was a disservice to the
country.

I think Viet Nam would not have been what it got to be if RFK had not been
killed. Also would not have had Carter.

It is easy to try to guess what someone might have done but Bobby was
to the right of his brother when it came to communists. Who knows what
he would have done, if elected. It was Bobby who decided an illegal
wire tap on MLK was in the national interest because he thought Martin
was a communist..

Bobby was no stranger to illegal wire taps and "sneak and peek"
warrantless searches tho. He was ordering them from the JFK DoJ too.

He was known to dislike escalating VN. Knew it was a no win situation.
Maybe he learned from the Cuban Missile Crises. Never said he was honest,
or even would have been a good President. But most likely we would not
have been mired in SEA.