The point is that you said they ruled and they did exactly the
opposite. In fact Kennedy (not one of the conservatives) wrote a brief
today informing Idaho that they could not avail themselves of the
Virginia court decision.
It is now up to the 9th circuit to decide.
They will probably knock down the Idaho ban but you never can tell.
It is clear that the SC really wants this to be decided in the lower
courts so they won't have to take a stand on it.
Maybe the liberals are afraid that it might go 5-4 the wrong way if
the case is not made in a way 5 can agree on.
I doubt the SCOTUS will take a case until one of the conservative
courts actually upholds a ban. It would force them to take the case.
A ruling on that would be significant.
Do you see the difference yet?
Only technically. The court can't decide against gay marriage.
Given the widespread acceptance of its "morality," they'd cause no end
of unrest. They've made other bad decisions, but they probably won't
make this mistake.
I don't understand "gayness," but I see the gay point in this matter.
Hell, I don't know any gay people. Of course you don't know what you
don't know.
But I think this is a done deal.
Similar Threads
Some Virginians are...
Threaded Mode
