On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:09:18 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:

On 8/12/2014 7:24 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 12 Aug 2014 12:47:47 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

That would be Boatless Flatulent Jim, who travels the Interstates in a tin
motel room. ?

===

Translation: Because Harry the double bankrupt, tax cheat, failure
does not own an RV, no one else should either.


On the subject of motorcycles. What do you think of trading in a Gold
Wing for a Can Am? I was following 3 motorcycles in Yellowstone,
recently, when a car pulled into traffic in front of them. Two of them
touched and went down instantly. Luckily they were moving slowly or
their injuries might have been more severe.

I can't imagine a Can Am being anywhere near the fun of a motorcycle. Might as well buy a small
convertible. Probably cheaper too.

http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/S/4/V/2/ag...rtwo_frtlt.JPG

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:03:26 -0400, Poco Loco wrote:

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:09:18 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:

On 8/12/2014 7:24 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 12 Aug 2014 12:47:47 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

That would be Boatless Flatulent Jim, who travels the Interstates in a tin
motel room. ?

===

Translation: Because Harry the double bankrupt, tax cheat, failure
does not own an RV, no one else should either.


On the subject of motorcycles. What do you think of trading in a Gold
Wing for a Can Am? I was following 3 motorcycles in Yellowstone,
recently, when a car pulled into traffic in front of them. Two of them
touched and went down instantly. Luckily they were moving slowly or
their injuries might have been more severe.

I can't imagine a Can Am being anywhere near the fun of a motorcycle. Might as well buy a small
convertible. Probably cheaper too.

http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/S/4/V/2/ag...rtwo_frtlt.JPG

Besides, I'll bet at least one of the two was doing something unsafe - like following too close
maybe? Or looking at the scenery instead of the road? Of course, that last one is easy to do in
Yellowstone, especially if there's some bison around.

On 8/12/2014 3:30 PM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:03:26 -0400, Poco Loco wrote:

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:09:18 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d wrote:

On 8/12/2014 7:24 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On 12 Aug 2014 12:47:47 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

That would be Boatless Flatulent Jim, who travels the Interstates in a tin
motel room. ?

===

Translation: Because Harry the double bankrupt, tax cheat, failure
does not own an RV, no one else should either.


On the subject of motorcycles. What do you think of trading in a Gold
Wing for a Can Am? I was following 3 motorcycles in Yellowstone,
recently, when a car pulled into traffic in front of them. Two of them
touched and went down instantly. Luckily they were moving slowly or
their injuries might have been more severe.

I can't imagine a Can Am being anywhere near the fun of a motorcycle. Might as well buy a small
convertible. Probably cheaper too.

http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/S/4/V/2/ag...rtwo_frtlt.JPG

Besides, I'll bet at least one of the two was doing something unsafe - like following too close
maybe? Or looking at the scenery instead of the road? Of course, that last one is easy to do in
Yellowstone, especially if there's some bison around.

Is riding two abreast unsafe? ;-)

--
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of
taking care of them".
Thomas Jefferson

On 8/12/2014 7:42 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:15:28 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:


Is riding two abreast unsafe? ;-)

Maryland uses to think so when I lived there. It was a ticket if you
were not staggered a little.


With good reason...

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:42:40 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:15:28 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:


Is riding two abreast unsafe? ;-)

Maryland uses to think so when I lived there. It was a ticket if you
were not staggered a little.

I believe the only state in which it's legal is California. That's how they can get away with 'white
lining'.

Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:42:40 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:15:28 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:


Is riding two abreast unsafe? ;-)

Maryland uses to think so when I lived there. It was a ticket if you
were not staggered a little.

I believe the only state in which it's legal is California. That's how
they can get away with 'white
lining'.

Not legal here. But you see cops doing lots of the time. The white
lining, is not legal as you see it most of the time. Supposed to be 15 mph
or less. Not 80 mph in 70 mph traffic.

On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:08:38 AM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:

Not legal here. But you see cops doing lots of the time. The white

lining, is not legal as you see it most of the time. Supposed to be 15 mph

or less. Not 80 mph in 70 mph traffic.

I love guys on bikes that think THEY own the dividing line on the Highway. When I see them coming, I always move over ON the center line, just to throw the fear of God into them. That and those ****ing loud pipes....annoying things that should be banned.

Harley Riders think they own the ****ing world. **** them.

Brilo says

" I love guys on bikes that think THEY own the dividing line on the Highway.. When I see them coming, I always move over ON the center line, just to throw the fear of God into them. That and those ****ing loud pipes....annoying things that should be banned.

Harley Riders think they own the ****ing world. **** them. "


You stupid jackass, ever think that maybe they are trying to avoid the center of the lane where oil and grease tends to accumulate....especially from the old clunkers losers like you tend to drive.

On 8/13/2014 2:27 AM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:08:38 AM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:

Not legal here. But you see cops doing lots of the time. The white

lining, is not legal as you see it most of the time. Supposed to be 15 mph

or less. Not 80 mph in 70 mph traffic.

I love guys on bikes that think THEY own the dividing line on the Highway. When I see them coming, I always move over ON the center line, just to throw the fear of God into them. That and those ****ing loud pipes....annoying things that should be banned.

Harley Riders think they own the ****ing world. **** them.


Loud pipes are a joke, for punks...

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:08:38 -0500, Califbill wrote:

Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:42:40 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:15:28 -0600, H*a*r*r*o*l*d
wrote:


Is riding two abreast unsafe? ;-)

Maryland uses to think so when I lived there. It was a ticket if you
were not staggered a little.

I believe the only state in which it's legal is California. That's how
they can get away with 'white
lining'.

Not legal here. But you see cops doing lots of the time. The white
lining, is not legal as you see it most of the time. Supposed to be 15 mph
or less. Not 80 mph in 70 mph traffic.

That's the way the laws read in Europe also. There's not much white lining at 70mph over there
though.